Posted on 01/20/2023 7:39:39 AM PST by Red Badger
rlmorel wrote: “So, if you have a 10% chance of dying from an infection, but a 20% chance of dying from the cure, and government officials force you to take it, you think that is fine then?”
That’s an absurd hypothetical. No one has made any claims remotely like that.
rlmorel wrote: “You cling to the government fostered fallacy that a “vaccination” that doesn’t not stop people from repeatedly contracting a virus, and does not stop the spread of a virus, is going to magically eradicate a virus.”
You cling to the fallacy that a vaccine must stop all infections to be consider a vaccine.
You also cling to the fallacy that a vaccine must stop all spread to be considere a vaccine.
Vaccines do not have to be 100% effective. None are. Not even the most effective ones.
JayGalt wrote: “It takes the circular reasoning of a climate change promoter to follow all the lies, admissions and shifts that have been advanced to create the illusion that there was clinical worth in these”jabs””
Not one of those quotes supports your claim that the vaccine does not stop the spread. Those quotes only state that it wasn’t tested for stopping the spread. The fact that it wasn’t tested for stopping transmission doesn’t mean it does not stop transmission.
The only way one can test for transmission is through ‘challenge trials’ which are consider unethical.
Care to explain how a vaccine that prevents person A from becoming infected does not stop Person A from spreading the disease?
From the story: "Moore and his co-defendants also allegedly gave children saline shots at the request of their parents so the children would think they were receiving a Covid vaccine."
They didn't refuse the parents because they understand this country isn't the damned Soviet Union or Communist China yet, and they sympathize with their views in spite of statists like you who are all in on this.
They were helping the parents protect their children from people like you who fully believe the State owns the children and has the final say on what they should be done to them, and not the parents.
What did the charity the good doctor had them donate to do for money?
liberalh8ter wrote: “What did the charity the good doctor had them donate to do for money?”
What does it matter?
Donating proceeds from a crime does not change the fact tha a crime was committed.
BTW, it’s clear from the article that not all proceeds were donated.
rlmorel wrote: “You have reading comprehension issues in addition to your other ones.”
No, but I think you have.
Why was it necessary to for for them to commit conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to convert, sell, convey, and dispose of government property, conversion sale, conveyance, and disposal of government property and aiding and abetting? All they had to do was tell the parents they had reasons not to give the vaccines.
The Plastic Institute of Utah Inc., along with office manager Kari Dee Burgoyne, 52, and receptionist Sandra Flores, 31, faces the same charges. According to court documents, Moore and his co-defendants allegedly ran a scheme out of Plastic Surgery Institute of Utah Inc. to defraud the United States and the CDC.
The documents say Moore and Andersen were members of a private organization seeking to “liberate the medical profession from government and industry conflicts of interest.”
In the allegations, the four destroyed at least $28,000 worth of Covid vaccinations and distributed at least 1,900 doses’ worth of fake completed vaccination record cards. The court documents allege the fake vaccination cards were sold either for direct cash payments of $50 per person per occurrence or required “donations to a specified charitable organization.”
The court documents estimate the fake vaccination cards have a total value of nearly $97,000. The issue is the crimes the committed.
Remember posters on FR like that guys who spent all of their time in threads about pit bull attacks...might have been chet99 or something like that, and the other guy was Willie Green with his trains.
That is all they used to post about. Had a stick up their rear ends about pit bull and choo choo train related things.
If you ever perused their posting histories, you would conclude those were the only thing that ever interested them. They were (and are) one-dimensional jokes who clung fiercely to those subjects to the exclusion of nearly anything else.
The vaccine protects neither against infection nor spread. I will pray for you.
In order to protect those children from ever being Covid vaxxed by anyone, anywhere, ever. As their parents wished.
”All they had to do was tell the parents they had reasons not to give the vaccines.”
Would that have prevented the children from being force vaccinated by any other doctor/school, against their parents wishes? No. Please understand, only by going the full measure of conspiracy could those people protect those children from the government. Is that how you think things ought to be in these United States of America?
Are you against a “private organization seeking to “liberate the medical profession from government and industry conflicts of interest.”?
What alternative explanation are you looking forward too? I just pointed out how you contradicted yourself. Its up to you to figure out how to resolve that, not me.
I do understand the demand for a doctor who would fill out the vaccination cards for someone who simply did not want to be vaccinated and had to be as a condition of work, school, etc.
But these people were greedy. If they were principled, they would have done it for no charge. Instead, their greed led them to charge $50 per card and sign off. It cost them nothing for the cards.
Hope they get the book thrown at them, as they made money off of people’s fears.
Life saving patriots.
Yes he is. He saved those kids. Big Pharma mandatory death shot "law" be damned.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.