Posted on 11/23/2022 11:49:50 AM PST by Red Badger
The Washington Post is reporting that Elon Musk made several “woke” staff members “cry” when he started rolling out his free speech agenda at Twitter.
In a Tuesday tech report, the newspaper accuses Musk of undermining Twitter’s ability to “protect vulnerable communities.”
The article, written by reporters Cat Zakrzewski, Faiz Siddiqui, and Joseph Menn, argues that Musk imposed his will on the company by gutting the “Trust and Safety team.”
The team previously handled the censorship of Twitter users and deliberated to “define dangerous language.”
The piece, headlined “Musk’s ‘free speech’ agenda dismantles safety work at Twitter, insiders say,” suggests he did so callously.
The report mentions multiple times that Musk’s decisions made Twitter employees “cry.”
The story cited more than a dozen former and current Twitter employees frustrated with how Musk undid “years of careful work.”
At the top of the list of employees’ complaints was Musk’s decision to reinstate the Twitter accounts of President Donald Trump, satirical conservative site The Babylon Bee, and others that were deemed threats by the now-defunct Trust and Safety team.
The report added, “Massive layoffs and Musk’s demand that remaining employees pledge to work ‘hardcore’ hours have left one of the world’s most influential social media sites operating with a skeleton staff and experts predicting an eventual crash.
“Meanwhile, advertisers are fleeing.”
It was then claimed that Musk leveraged “culture-war issues” to make the company in his own image.
The piece said, “Musk has moved rapidly — at times erratically — to undermine a regime built over a decade to define dangerous language on the site and protect vulnerable communities, replacing it with his own more impulsive style of ad hoc decision-making.”
As the article continued, the reporters said they spoke to “more than a dozen current and former employees.”
Those employees reportedly claimed that Musk was able to impose his will on Twitter because he “fired or alienated Trust and Safety team leaders and reversed their decisions.”
Rather than repopulate the team, the piece claimed, “Musk is looking to automate much of the Trust and Safety team’s work to police content — eliminating some of the nuance from complicated decisions for a cheaper approach.”
The report implies that Twitter will make poorer moderation decisions going forward.
The Washington Post reported how, “On his first night as owner, Musk fired its leader of 11 years, former Trust and Safety head Vijaya Gadde.”
Gadde has previously been identified as Twitter’s “censorship chief” and was instrumental in banning Trump and blocking the Hunter Biden laptop scandal.
While suggesting that Musk is insensitive, the Post’s report stated that within hours of assuming control of the site, “Gadde’s access to company email and other systems was cut off; she couldn’t even say a formal farewell.
“At a Halloween party at Twitter headquarters where workers had brought children dressed in costumes, some employees quietly left to go cry.”
Mentioning Musk’s decision to reinstate The Babylon Bee and renowned clinical psychologist Jordan Peterson, The Post stated, “If the company restored the two accounts without a clear reason, it would undo years of careful work.”
It characterized Musk’s decision as a “sudden demand” that was “problematic.”
The piece also described “Black Thursday” – the day on which Musk laid off a big portion of the Trust and Safety team, writing, “As layoff notices went out — first to Asia and Europe, then the United States — a group of longtime Twitter executives huddled together in a conference room and cried.”
Thenmozhi Soundararajan, the executive director of an Indian rights group called Equality Labs, after seeing her emails to fired Twitter employers bounce back to her, told the paper, “It is such a dangerous time to have fired the moderators and this team.
“Twitter has been already in a state of failure, this is just the nail in the coffin.”
I can’t understand why he wanted to get involved with that cesspool of Uber Liberal knuckleheads, anyway . Glad he did though .
Of course they cried.
They’re “woke”.
The nazis were crying?
Snowflakes can’t handle the truth.
Yes by kicking off a sitting president while allowing the Taliban and child predators to remain.
to make them cry, duh!
i’d spend that many billions to do that. well worth the investment.
I don’t know if I would pay 44 billion but this is 1st class entertainment to see solids cry!
Blah , they cried because they’re loosing all that power ,LOL
I don’t know if I would pay 44 billion but this is 1st class entertainment to see wokies cry!
The sheer number of "adult" third-graders roaming around is absolutely appalling.
Good, firest the wokest department in the company, then fire everyone who cries about you firing the wokest department in the company. That’s a blueprint a lot of corporations should probably follow.
Apparatchiks are unhappy.
Too effing bad.
>>The article, written by reporters Cat Zakrzewski, Faiz Siddiqui, and Joseph Menn, argues that Musk imposed his will on the company ...
The nerve of that guy!!! And the company’s owner just let Musk get away with it???!?
“undermine a regime built over a decade to define dangerous language”
Useless work. The courts have already defined “dangerous language”. It includes clear, explicit, and imminent threats of violence, or incitement of illegal activities. That’s about it. We don’t need 100 Twitter employees working for a decade trying to redefine it.
I think there’s a song in there:
“Tears From A Snowflake”, the heart wrenching story of a ‘woke’ millenial(sp?) being introduced to reality (without the company paid for wine bar)!
C’mon creative FReepers, write a song! (At least if one has not yet been written.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.