Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flashback: Abortion rights group sues Mississippi over abortion laws [*they* put this in front of SCOTUS]
The Hill ^ | 04/09/18 | AVERY ANAPOL

Posted on 06/25/2022 2:40:18 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat

An abortion rights group is suing the state of Mississippi over its abortion laws.

The Center for Reproductive Rights alleges in a 59-page lawsuit that the state has been conducting a “25-year legislative campaign to eliminate women’s constitutional right to access abortion.”

The group filed the suit following a new state law banning abortions after 15 weeks, the most restrictive abortion ban in the country, which the group argues is “unconstitutional.”

...

The lawsuit filed Monday is also on behalf of the clinic, the Jackson Women’s Health Organization. It challenges several of the state’s abortion laws, including the new 15-week ban, the mandatory 24-hour waiting period between a consultation and procedure and a requirement that only physicians can perform abortions.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: abortion; constitution; rights; roevwade; scotus
"The Center for Reproductive Rights" - how ironic but for them filing this lawsuit, the matter could not and would not have gotten in front of the Court to decide. They could have just let these laws stand without challenging them in Court. They filed the suit...that's how the SCOTUS had a case to rule on. Everything in the Dobbs decision is legally sound and accurate - the Constitution says what it says, and doesn't say what it doesn't say. But in order to make this finding, there had to be a case before them...they can't just issue a decision on their own. A fact the media and the Left are now of course ignoring as though the Supreme Court in isolation just decided to overturn Roe due to the actions of Republicans merely wanting them to do so.

The Left brought about the end of Roe due to wanting abortions anytime, anywhere, for any reason without any restrictions - *they* are the ones who filed this case. Not conservatives.

1 posted on 06/25/2022 2:40:18 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

<>*they* are the ones who filed this case<>

Heh, heh.


2 posted on 06/25/2022 2:43:35 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Great find.


3 posted on 06/25/2022 2:44:12 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Candidate Trump: I’ll appoint Supreme Court justices to overturn Roe v. Wade abortion case: OCT 19 2016 9:31 PM EDT

PUBLISHED WED, OCT 19 2016 9:31 PM EDT, UPDATED WED, OCT 19 2016 10:00 PM EDT

Dan Mangan @_DANMANGAN

Donald Trump said the overturning of the landmark Supreme Court decision giving women the right to abortion “will happen, automatically,” if he is elected president and gets to appoint justices to the high court.

“I am pro-life,” Trump said during Wednesday night’s presidential debate when asked whether he wanted that decision, Roe v. Wade, reversed by the Supreme Court.

Trump said that if the ruling were to be reversed, laws on the legality or illegality of abortion would “go back to the individual states” to decide, which was the case prior to Roe v. Wade.

But when moderator Chris Wallace pressed him on whether he wanted the ruling overturned.

Trump said, “That will happen, automatically in my opinion!” because he would get to nominate potentially several justices to the court.

In response, Hillary Clinton said, “I strongly support Roe v. Wade.”

“I will defend Roe v. Wade, I will defend a woman’s right to make her own decision,” Clinton said.

She criticized Trump for having said in the past that a woman should be punished if she got an abortion when it was made illegal.

Trump fired back, saying Clinton was in favor of partial-birth abortions being legal, which meant that a fetus could be “ripped out” of a mother’s womb a day before she was due to give birth.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4073578/posts

Thanks to SoConPubbie for posting this prediction by candidate Trump in 2016!:

WED, OCT 19 2016 9:31 PM EDT UPDATED WED, OCT 19 2016 10:00 PM EDT

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FWBotT0XoAEYrYO?format=jpg&name=large


4 posted on 06/25/2022 2:44:37 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Has anyone, recently, seen a Biden sticker on any vehicle and in particular at/in a gas station!!!??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

We want to get pregnant so we can have an abortion and be proud of it.


5 posted on 06/25/2022 2:47:30 PM PDT by SkyDancer ( I make airplanes fly, what's your super power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luke21; Jacquerie

Because look at the suit - had they only sued over the 15 weeks issue, that may have been the only thing the Court could have ruled on - is a 15 week restriction constitutional? Instead, they sued over everything - 24 hour waiting period, must be performed by a physician, etc. That pretty much fully opened the door about whether or not a state can impose any restrictions at all...opening the door for Roe to be fully reviewed in its entirety.


6 posted on 06/25/2022 2:49:51 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
The Left brought about the end of Roe due to wanting abortions anytime, anywhere, for any reason without any restrictions - *they* are the ones who filed this case. Not conservatives.

Mississippi's law wasn't even unreasonable. It was in line with the abortion laws of many "enlightened" European countries that the left so idolizes.

7 posted on 06/25/2022 2:49:51 PM PDT by Drew68 (Ron DeSantis for President 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

They didn’t think this case through. There have lots of signals from members of the U.S. Supreme Court that they were looking to the right case to reverse Roe v. Wade.

As a practical matter, the case decided on Friday will not make any difference. There will always be states where abortion at any stage will be legal.


8 posted on 06/25/2022 2:57:47 PM PDT by WASCWatch ( WASC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

They have twitter, instagram and facebook accounts too. Would be a shame if people mocked them, thanked them for causing roe to be overturned.

https://twitter.com/reprorights

https://instagram.com/reprorights

https://facebook.com/reproductiverights


9 posted on 06/25/2022 3:06:00 PM PDT by Pollard (If there's a question mark in the headline, the answer should always be No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pollard

Gee, they encourage baby killers to petition their state governments. What a concept.


10 posted on 06/25/2022 4:13:53 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
 
 
Falls under "be careful what you wish for".
 
 

11 posted on 06/25/2022 4:55:53 PM PDT by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WASCWatch
 
 
Freaking hilarious - they were the architects of their own undoing.
 
 

12 posted on 06/25/2022 4:57:46 PM PDT by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lapsus calami

When they filed the suit Ruth B Ginsberg was still alive. Talk about not thinking something through and bad timing.


13 posted on 06/26/2022 8:15:25 AM PDT by CaptainK ("If life's really hard, at least its short")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK
 
 
Not the brightest bulbs in the box were they. They got greedy, went all in on their suit, and lost. They did it to themselves - and they're all mad at us? LoL.
 
 

14 posted on 06/26/2022 8:26:32 AM PDT by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson