Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Research Is Clear: Ivermectin Is a Safe, Effective Treatment for COVID, so Why Isn’t It Being Used?
NOQ Report ^ | 10/05/2021 | Elizabeth Mumper, M.D., FAAP

Posted on 10/05/2021 9:35:18 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Despite efforts to denigrate ivermectin as “horse paste” and prevent doctors from prescribing it and patients from using it, the latest research shows this safe, inexpensive drug is effective at keeping COVID patients out of the hospital.

A patient with Type 1 diabetes called to tell me the pharmacist at our local Walgreens refused to fill the prescription I had written for ivermectin, so I called to ask why.

The young pharmacist, a few years out of pharmacy school, informed me he did not understand why I was using ivermectin for early treatment of COVID because “SARS-CoV-2 does not have an exoskeleton.”

I explained I was not using ivermectin as an anti-parasitic medication, but that it had impressive data as an anti-inflammatory and anti-viral. Furthermore, as a pediatrician, I have more than 40 years of experience managing multiple viral illnesses. There is value in treating viruses early, often with inexpensive natural remedies, rather than “staying at home until you have problems breathing then go to the hospital” as U.S. public officials have advised for COVID.

The pharmacist was not buying my initial explanation. “I am not going to fill prescriptions for ivermectin that are used in pseudo vaccine doses,” he told me.

I was surprised a young pharmacist was able to override an experienced physician’s prescription, effectively removing an inexpensive prevention and treatment option for selected patients in the middle of a pandemic.

The medical educator in me kicked in. “I would be happy to send you some references about the use of ivermectin for treatment and prevention. There are impressive studies from Argentina, Peru, Africa and India that suggest much better outcomes than we are achieving here in the U.S. with our single-minded focus on vaccines.”

He told me the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) did not recommend ivermectin for COVID. I asked to see the documentation and he agreed to fax it to me. I hand-delivered 93 references and a great review article to the Walgreens. The pharmacist faxed back a post from March 5, on the FDA website entitled “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.”

The next day, I received notice that a pharmacy in Northern Virginia would not fill any prescriptions for ivermectin if the diagnosis code mentioned COVID.

I had written an ivermectin prescription for a patient who has a history of bad reactions to vaccines and significant autoimmune illness. His adolescent age means that he is at very low risk of death from COVID itself.

Based on my experience as his doctor for over a decade, I was worried about potential adverse events if he got the COVID vaccine. I dug into the data about ivermectin, and it seemed like a great option for him to have on hand for early treatment of COVID if he got sick.

A pharmacist in a drug store, who never examined my patient or learned his extensive medical history, got to trump my best medical judgment by refusing to fill the prescription.

The same day, in a conversation with a compounding pharmacy, we learned of a case in which a patient’s family had to take a hospital to court to obtain treatment with ivermectin.

Bear in mind that the safety profile for ivermectin is excellent and the drug is spectacularly less expensive than the vast majority of hospital interventions.

Three days later, on a zoom call with a colleague whose parents live in Colorado, I learned that a pharmacist at a major drugstore was not only refusing to fill ivermectin for 86- and 87-year-old patients who held valid prescriptions, but the pharmacist was taking the initiative to remind the other King Soopers pharmacies in the state not to fill those prescriptions either.

My analysis of the medical literature is that ivermectin has an impressive safety record and there are multiple studies from around the globe suggesting it can decrease morbidity and mortality from COVID 19.

Two doctors who were actually in the ICU treating real patients, Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory, looked at their prior experience with similarly sick patients and reviewed treatment strategies to determine what could be helpful.

As Dr. Anthony Fauci advised us to “stay home and wait for the vaccine,” frontline doctors took care of the patients before them, learning valuable lessons about what worked and what did not.

Let’s hit the highlights, quoting directly from the review paper by Kory et al, Jan 2021:

Kory and Marik compiled eight studies (three randomized controlled studies and five observational controlled studies) demonstrating efficacy in prevention of COVID-19 with significant decreased transmission.

They found 19 controlled studies that showed significant impacts on time to recovery, hospital stay, decrease in viral loads, reductions in duration of cough and decreased mortality.

In medical history pre-COVID, this body of research about ivermectin would be applauded for bringing value in the midst of a pandemic. In the medical era pre-COVID, the judgment and experience of clinicians at the patient’s bedside counted for something.

Pre-COVID, we taught medical students to use keen observational skills and keep accurate records of whether the patient improved or deteriorated after the treatment strategies used.

In the Age of COVID, pharmacists who chide doctors that “COVID does not have an exoskeleton” deny patients ivermectin — a safe, cheap, effective and potentially life-saving early treatment.

If you or your patients are having trouble getting ivermectin prescriptions filled for COVID 19 prevention or treatment, see this excellent resource from the Front Line COVID 19 Critical Care Alliance.



TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: covid19; covidstooges; deathjab; fantasy; ivermectin; iylm; killervaxx; obamacare; safety; satanschildren; scamdemic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
To: SeekAndFind

I concur.

I tested positive and as soon as I got home from a 350 mile trip began taking the Ivermectin we had procured by prescription a couple months before.

Had a lot of fatigue. All other symptoms were greatly mitigated.

Back in the saddle about ten days later.

Ivermectin works!

I also discovered that my exzema got a whole lot better. Seems there a study that concludes the ivermectin works to keep it at bay.

Need to have a talk with a doc about that.


41 posted on 10/05/2021 10:04:07 AM PDT by cyclotic (Live your life in such a way that they hate you as much as they hated Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hambone 1934

Not being used because of one huge entity, Big Pharma.

If COVID-19 Wuhan virus infections are too easily cured, the “emergency use authorization” granted to Merck, Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson for the distribution of the experimental mRNA vaccines could not be carried out, so the “death toll” from the coronavirus had to be greatly overstated, and withholding ivermectin or the hydroxychloroquine-zinc-azithromycin treatment protocols allowed many of these infections, in the presence of other comorbidities, to proceed to the death stage.

But death only rarely comes from COVID-19 Wuhan virus alone, but far more frequently because of an already stressed or failing immune system, and many more people died WITH the Wuhan virus, that died FROM the Wuhan virus.

Hundreds of thousands have died needlessly just in the US alone, and perhaps millions around the world.

If this was “following the science”, then somebody has been pretty actively switching the signposts around. Following the POLITICAL science, maybe, but not medical science.

Political science seems to be saying, there are just too damned many people now alive, we got to cut it down a couple billion. So they still have a ways to go. Now it is only a matter of picking the winners and the losers in this great die-back.


42 posted on 10/05/2021 10:04:36 AM PDT by alloysteel ("Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." - Hanlon's Razor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

crime against humanity


43 posted on 10/05/2021 10:05:30 AM PDT by RockyTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry
we are reduced to having to buy it as a horse paste.....

By no means!

Easiest form is the "injectible," which is a gel marketed for "cattle and swine," but is a clear gel that dissolves in water and can be taken orally by us people. As I recall, the dosage is 1mg--which in this case is the same as 1 milliliter--per 110 pounds of body weight. (You can get a plastic measuring syringe at any big drugstore.) It dissolves easily in water or vodka, your choice.

Two simple words: Tractor Supply, especially in more rural towns.

It works like a charm to suppress symptoms, to kill off an existing infection, or as a preventive. That might be why the Pharma lords and their employees like Fauci hate it so much. I've never noticed or heard of any side effects. People all over the world take it to kill off tropical diseases.

44 posted on 10/05/2021 10:08:10 AM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Antonio estimated about 70% of her ICU patients said during the country’s deadly second wave (in late 2020 and early 2021) that they had taken ivermectin, and ‘I regret to say most of those patients have died, she said.”

https://www.businessinsider.com/brazil-tragic-ivermectin-for-covid-frenzy-warning-to-us-experts-2021-9

“’We Brazilians had to learn in the hardest way that ivermectin didn’t work.’”

“More than nine in 10 Brazilians say they’ve been vaccinated or intend to get their shots, according to a May poll.”

“’It might look interesting,’ Antonio said, referencing studies showing that ivermectin can kill COVID-19 in a petri dish, ‘but in humans, you have plenty of complex pathways competing for the virus in your body.’”


45 posted on 10/05/2021 10:10:27 AM PDT by Brian Griffin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Satan’s children are “in charge” of everything important now.

From academia to government, from the hospitals to Big Pharma.

They own it ALL.

The Death Vaxx is win-win for the terrorists “in charge” at the hospitals and Big Pharma, as they are able to systematically eradicate the peasants they hate so much, and simultaneously cash in on the sales of their Rat Poison Jabs.

They get all the cash, and you die a miserable death.

Any other questions?


46 posted on 10/05/2021 10:14:38 AM PDT by Prole ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan
moneymoneymoneymoneymoneymoneymoneymoneymoney................

It is said that Pfizer took in $3.5 billion for the "vaccine" in the first 3 months of this year. That's 90 days, so they took in about $39 million per day.

47 posted on 10/05/2021 10:17:53 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (You are not a horse, you are not a cow. Seriously, y'all. Stop it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Because the people in charge of the government are too invested in the narrative that it is unsafe and that's why we needed the Emergency Use Authorization.

They would lose too much "face" to backtrack on that position now, so Ivermectin can never be safe again.

Given the choice between a few dozen government officials and millions of sick Americans, the government officials will win every time.

-PJ

48 posted on 10/05/2021 10:19:52 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hambone 1934

The behavior of big pharma wrt to COVID, makes me wonder why cancer has been around for so long!


49 posted on 10/05/2021 10:21:56 AM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This whole CONdemic is about

CONTROL!

Kill the 'useless eaters' (like those who are in nursing homes), hook everyone else on the forced, illegal gene therapy, and destroy the economy. (Easy to do when you have a 'President' with few mental faculties, and a ton of corrupt politicians (but I repeat myself), judges, 'civil servants', the MSM, etc. on y the CCP payroll. Couple that with Bill Gates' desire to drop the world population to 1 billion. Remember, he started a vaxx program in Africa, to 'help poor people'. What has happened, is that hundreds of thousand of young girls have been sterilized via these vaxxes. Poor countries don't have access to the Covid vaxxes, and should die, Wm Gates likely thought. Fortunately, these countries quickly realized that Ivermectin and HQC WORK.

This is a long term coup by the ChiComs, that has been playing out for years. PDJT threw a monkey wrench, when he was elected in 2016. THAT was not part of 'the Plan©️.

The problem is, the ChiComs don't realize that Americans WILL NOT bow to their taking Taiwan 'kinetically'. Too many Dhimmicrats have too much to lose, if that happens, so there will be war VERY SOON in Asia, AND the US WILL be involved.

Too many pols are too 'invested' in how Ivermectin is 'bad' and how 2, 3, 4, 5, etc. injections are 'good'. If they admitted that they knew as early as April 2020, that Ivermectin and HQC were known to kill Covid-19, they would be facing LYNCHING SQUADS. Professional politicians have no conscience about lying for their advancement. Personsl Integrity? NOT A CHANCE!

Here is just ONE ARTICLE about how ivermectin worked in India. This is not NEW that Ivermectin WORKS! As early as APRIL 3, 2020, FR had an article on invermectin working to KILL the CCP-Coronavirus. That SHOULD answer your question.

50 posted on 10/05/2021 10:35:56 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (Ceterum autem censeo Justinius True-dope-us esse delendam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Because you can buy it cheaply from the back of a street pharmacist in the slums of India. A dose is pennies.


51 posted on 10/05/2021 10:36:14 AM PDT by Organic Panic (Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Medical Nazism …

This is how it is now.


52 posted on 10/05/2021 10:39:49 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal (Jesus + Something = Nothing ; Jesus + Nothing = Everything )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s all because President trump once mentioned that drug


53 posted on 10/05/2021 10:43:38 AM PDT by Lee25 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic

How can a Big Parma CEO make billions on a drug that costs less than aspirin?


54 posted on 10/05/2021 10:50:20 AM PDT by bray (Our patience is wearing thin Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin; Uncle Miltie; Governor Dinwiddie; SeekAndFind
(Vaccination, I should add, is still the most effective, safest, cheapest, and easiest way to avoid getting sick.)

I totally agree!

For instance, this young woman in her 30s will never be sick again in her life!  ROFL face

King County woman dies from blood clots after getting Johnson & Johnson vaccine
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4000858/posts

55 posted on 10/05/2021 11:04:16 AM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

“Business Insider”, The fave rag of the Red Diaper Babies of America...


56 posted on 10/05/2021 11:06:25 AM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Money. Big pharma bribing CDC and FDA to denounce and disparage ivermectin. Duh.


57 posted on 10/05/2021 11:11:56 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The answer to why Ivermectin is not being used is in the title, it is “safe and effective”. Both qualities prohibit its use.


58 posted on 10/05/2021 11:13:50 AM PDT by WilliamOrby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bookmark.


59 posted on 10/05/2021 11:13:57 AM PDT by grobdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America; All
Merck was part of the ivermectin development 40 years ago.

Some people need to educate themselves. Watch:

https://rumble.com/vlpecw-the-story-of-ivermectin.html

60 posted on 10/05/2021 11:14:40 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson