Ping: This is a simpler, more shareable description of the distorted impression given by Covid “vaccines” efficacy claims.
I have a ring on my finger which to date has been 100% effective in keeping elephants away. Seem to do well at keeping my wife away, too.
In real world observation, we can see it’s no where near 95%.
Effective in adverse effects
Billions and billions and billions of dollars in profit for these vaccines. And yes you will “require” a booster every year... forever.
The vaccines are largely useless for anyone not in the high risk category for Wuhan flu death.
No, I’m not antivax nor do I subscribe to the conspiracy theories promulgated by Qcultists that post mostly crap science.
This is just a practical observation.
It’s like amplifiers that go up to 11...
it is NOT a vaccine.
it was made BEFORE the putative release.
Dr. David Martin on Spike Protein Depopulation Patents Since 2002
Dr. David Martin on the CDC's, FauXi's, Daszak's, and Gates' plans
Bill Gates on the Side Effects and his DNA operating systems
“Unreported absolute risk reduction measures of 0.7% and 1.1% for the Pfzier/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, respectively, are very much lower than the reported relative risk reduction measures.”
Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trials.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7996517/
95% of “experts” are lying sociopaths.
This “absolute risk” math can easily be debunked. It is missing a core variable: time.
The trial covered 28 days post vaccination. Sure only 0.7% developed COVID over that time, but how many would over a full year, or a full decade without the vaccine?
Do those numbers and all of a sudden the same “absolute risk” calculation is preventing a huge number of cases.
95% of people will die from it? (they hope).
95% effective.
I’m glad stepping on my brake pedal has a much higher rate of effectiveness than that.
The human immune system is at least 99% effective against the virus.
“Vaccine Makers Claim COVID Shots Are ‘95% Effective’ — But What Does That Mean?”
It simply means that the “jab’ is 95% effective at having adverse effects on one’s biological system.
A well written explanation.
From June 17 on OAN. I guess they got ignored.
I never saw the two numbers .7 or .74 but when someone asked me what the effectiveness of the vaccines were i told them about the same as your natural immunity. I guess i was right.
Hal Turner just broke this on his show. A Russian hacker went on the dark web and found a database that shows vaccinated people’s info (vital signs, their exact GPS coordinates, whether they are sleeping or awake) being uploaded in real time. People who have received the jab are now being tracked in real time by the 5G networks. They have become transmitters, transmitting all info about themselves back to the mother-ship aka the AI receiver. This is wild.... It also shows the exact info of the firmware, CPU info and processor that is inside the person.
I have no way to confirm the validity of this, but if true, people getting the vaccine, are getting more than they bargained for. Is this only in Russia? Something makes me doubt that it is, if it's true.