This “absolute risk” math can easily be debunked. It is missing a core variable: time.
The trial covered 28 days post vaccination. Sure only 0.7% developed COVID over that time, but how many would over a full year, or a full decade without the vaccine?
Do those numbers and all of a sudden the same “absolute risk” calculation is preventing a huge number of cases.
This “absolute risk” math can easily be debunked. It is missing a core variable: time.
The trial covered 28 days post vaccination. Sure only 0.7% developed COVID over that time, but how many would over a full year, or a full decade without the vaccine?
Do those numbers and all of a sudden the same “absolute risk” calculation is preventing a huge number of cases.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Many of the vaccinated would prove ill over a long period of time and many would be having severe medical problems. More time would NOT help the efficacy of the ‘vaccine’.