Skip to comments.
DNA testing found ZERO tuna in Subway's tuna sandwiches and I have serious concerns about what I've been eating all these years
Not The Bee ^
 | 23 Jun 21
 | Not The Bee
Posted on 06/24/2021 9:31:56 AM PDT by Politically Correct
Subway claims that its tuna is "100% wild caught," but a lab test paid for by The New York Times found absolutely no tuna DNA in over 60 inches of sandwich.
(Excerpt) Read more at notthebee.com ...
TOPICS: 
KEYWORDS: bloggers; breakingnews; frankenfood; notnews; politicallycorrect; sandwiches; soylentgreen; subway; tuna
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next  last
    Soylent Green is people!
To: Politically Correct; Gamecock; SaveFerris; PROCON; mylife
    Well, nutria is a KIND of tuna.
 
2
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:33:29 AM PDT
by 
Larry Lucido
(Donate!  Don't just post clickbait!)
 
To: Larry Lucido
    Well, nutria is a KIND of tuna. For certain definitions of "tuna."
 
3
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:34:37 AM PDT
by 
Politically Correct
(A member of the rabble in good standing)
 
To: Larry Lucido
    Only in Louisiana, though......................
 
4
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:35:12 AM PDT
by 
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
 
    Does it pass the magnet test?
 
5
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:35:36 AM PDT
by 
proust
(All posts made under this handle are, for the intents and purposes of the author, considered satire.)
 
To: Politically Correct
    Nutria....The other white meat!.....................
 
6
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:36:04 AM PDT
by 
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
 
To: Politically Correct
    Any one who eats at subway is stupid.
 
7
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:36:30 AM PDT
by 
Jonny7797
 
To: Politically Correct
    “The experiment included sandwiches from three Subway shops in Los Angeles.”
The article goes on to note that other tests have confirmed tuna in the, er, tuna in different locations.
The most likely explanation is that the Subway franchisee operating those shops in LA got cheap and didn’t want to actually pay for tuna. Few Subways are corporate stores, almost all of them are independent franchisees and Subway doesn’t police them anywhere nearly as well as they could. Not the first time a franchisee (in general, not just Subway) has played fast and loose with ingredients to increase profit margins.
 
8
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:36:32 AM PDT
by 
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
 
To: Politically Correct
    Isn’t the Pelosi Crime Family involved in the tuna industry?
 
9
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:36:41 AM PDT
by 
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer”)
 
To: proust
    I’m not even gonna ask what’s in their meatball sub....................
 
10
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:37:03 AM PDT
by 
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
 
To: Politically Correct
    Subway food is largely unfit for human consumption. In the earlier case of two women suing Subway for their tuna-free tuna, the tests revealed not only no tuna but no fish at all! I can see substituting some cheaper fish for tuna, but no fish at all?!?! What the heck is it? And Subway brazenly boasts that their tuna is sustainably and mercifully harvested!
 
11
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:37:39 AM PDT
by 
Blurb2350
(posted from my 1500-watt blow dryer)
 
To: Spktyr
12
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:38:17 AM PDT
by 
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
 
To: Politically Correct
    Did they check for chicken?
 
13
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:38:37 AM PDT
by 
a fool in paradise
(Lean on Joe Biden to follow Donald Trump's example and donate his annual salary to charity.)
 
To: Politically Correct
    Anyone who still eats at subway needs serious help.
 
To: Politically Correct
    Well it was hauled in and delivered by a Tuna boat so it must be tuna... lol
 
15
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:39:23 AM PDT
by 
Openurmind
(The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
 
To: Blurb2350
    The most sustainable tuna harvesting is not to harvest tuna at all...
 
16
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:40:00 AM PDT
by 
a fool in paradise
(Lean on Joe Biden to follow Donald Trump's example and donate his annual salary to charity.)
 
To: Openurmind
    Or it could be boxes of Democrat ballots.
 
17
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:42:05 AM PDT
by 
a fool in paradise
(Lean on Joe Biden to follow Donald Trump's example and donate his annual salary to charity.)
 
To: Politically Correct
    Compared to other Subway meat, the Tuna appeared to be the only actual meat. Seems my instincts were off. One of these days we will wake up and find Bill Gates’ prognostications of a “Meatless America” has already been implemented…long ago…
 
18
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:42:06 AM PDT
by 
Jan_Sobieski
(Sanctification)
 
To: Politically Correct
    “You could eligible for compensation”?
Whatever it was it tasted fine and it’s too late to test it now. Haven’t eaten in one for years, wonder when this started.
 
19
posted on 
06/24/2021 9:42:40 AM PDT
by 
SaxxonWoods
( comment might be sarcasm, or not. It depends. Often I'm not sure either.)
 
To: Smellin Salt
    >Anyone who still eats at subway needs serious help.
Didn’t they get caught using ingredients from Yoga Mats in their bread once upon a time?
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson