Posted on 07/30/2020 12:58:50 PM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
An article in the New England Journal of Medicine has suggested that “substantive penalties” be used to enforce compliance in taking the upcoming COVID-19 vaccine, including loss of employment.
The journal published an article on June 26 titled, “Ensuring Uptake of Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.” They suggested that the suspension of employment would be a less coercive manner of enforcing vaccine compliance than fines or other criminal penalties.
The report states that “state mandates should not be structured as compulsory vaccination (absolute requirements); instead, noncompliance should incur a penalty.”
(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...
Cause they know government mandates would face a years long slog through the courts.
The upcoming vaccine? Hmmm, they seem a little too confident there.
Couldn’t see that one coming, could we?
“state mandates should not be structured as compulsory vaccination (absolute requirements); instead, noncompliance should incur a penalty.”
Seems like a false sense of choice. Do it, or you’ll wish you did it.
Land of the fee, home of the knave...
Welfare bums,no problem.
We warned of this before we got shadow banned on Twitter.
The trial balloon for this was the ACA. Once they realized that Americans will swallow a compulsory fee for non compliance, they’ve been emboldened to try more egregious schemes.
This will mean the end of my employment if it happens.
I. Will. Not. Comply.
I wonder how much influence Fauci and his minions have on this?
Of course, if we work from home, are they going to come an inject us whether we like it or not. They’ll probably put us in straight-jackets then inject us or haul us off to some prison.
Imagine the crap that’s going to go on if puppet Joe wins the election and the Domestic enemies take both houses. I tell anyone who will listen, make sure you and your family are armed and trained, the domestic enemies running cities are already allowing their paramilitary groups to destroy property and physically attack those that oppose them, November 3rd could be just like Jan.30 1933 in Germany only this time they will be aiming for white people
I am sure they would be exceptions for illegal immigrants, Muslims, and any others who are in particular favor with the ruling party.
Doctors are getting a bit to uppity these days. They are not necessarily the smartest person in the room. Too many do not care one bit about freedom and liberty, and they definitely don’t know out to obtain security. They do not need to know if I own a gun. They do not need to know anything personal that I don’t want to tell them. And they certainly have no business forcing medicine or medical procedures on me that I do not approve.
Probably SS benefits next.
I’ve not been an anti-vaxer but they start this chit and I am anti-vaxer all the way.
Don’t be surprised if private companies require their employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment.
Based on conversations I have had with medical workers there will be a severe shortage of hospital and doctor office workers should this vaccine become mandatory. Many will just quit and walk away from years of experience rather than be injected with something that modifies their DNA...
I can think of none.
Seems like 'COVID19' is the new code-word that instantly validates whatever tyrannical edict that pops into these creature's heads.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.