Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q Anon: 06/04/20 Trust Trump's Plan ~ Vol.255, Q Day 951
qmap.pub ^ | 6/4/2020 | FReepers and FReeQs, vanity

Posted on 06/04/2020 9:03:11 AM PDT by ransomnote


Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.

Q describes this awakening as follows: 

"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).

When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable. 

When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’. 

"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma. 

When you are awake, you are able to clearly see. 

The choice is yours, and yours alone. 

Trust and put faith in yourself. 

You are not alone and you are not in the minority. 

Difficult truths will soon see the light of day. 

WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)

We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free. 

For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content. 

Q drops can be found here in their original format. 

Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table

The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com

Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement. 

Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see. 

In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.

Where We Go 1, We Go All

Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table linked in Post #2 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and information sources we've identified.



TOPICS: Conspiracy; Miscellaneous; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: anydaynow; deepstatescam; itstwuitstwu; jfkjuniorlives; maga; masksewingcircle; noinsideinfo; q; qanon; qarens; qisaretweetoffender; trump; vitameatavegamin; wasteoftime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,041-2,0602,061-2,0802,081-2,100 ... 2,141-2,157 next last
To: GYPSY286

The Deep State would not have known two years ago the name of the person, George Floyd, who would feature in a set up for these “protests” we are seeing now.

They would only have general plans to pull what they have pulled with George Floyd and would work out the details later.

George Floyd is either dead or the Q team themselves set up the George Floyd incident for their own reasons.

George Floyd means nothing to the Deep State. They would have no reason to keep him alive once he outlived his usefulness.


2,061 posted on 06/06/2020 8:44:58 PM PDT by CheshireTheCat ("Forgetting pain is convenient.Remembering it agonizing.But recovering truth is worth the suffering")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2024 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Trump stated he was going to use the insurrection act which federalizes the national army. The military refused.
The segment I pointed to was 5 minutes
2,062 posted on 06/06/2020 8:45:16 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2059 | View Replies]

To: Unrepentant VN Vet

Those instigating the riots are like rabid animals.


2,063 posted on 06/06/2020 8:45:57 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2032 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

To clarify - I’m not sure exactly what they’re doing - but I described the techniques normally employed creating “thumbnails”. I’m also interested in reading the speech from graduation because there might be something he said that would indicate foresight. The “code” replied to by “Q” indicates that the image is associated but that it’s more to the question how + when it (and which + what) became associated ... we don’t know those things - but “Q” does & Hussein does & @Jack does. TBD + WWG1WGA :)


2,064 posted on 06/06/2020 8:48:28 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2050 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

2,065 posted on 06/06/2020 8:50:40 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2063 | View Replies]

To: BiggBob

Thanks for that. I was going to ask about congresspeeps but figured I’l click the link. Copying along with the oath that you posted just for completeness, plus it has the President’s oath of office. Very interesting, so all federal judges and both houses of Congress; wondering if all State legislators use this oath.

Federal employees, Representatives, Senators, judges, political appointees, the President and Vice President of the United States take an oath of office. So what does taking an oath mean? Why even do it?

The reason is simple – public servants are just that – servants of the people. After much debate about an Oath, the framers of the U. S. Constitution included the requirement to take an Oath of Office in the Constitution itself. Article VI of the Constitution says, “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” The Constitution does not prescribe the actual text of the Article VI oaths. For federal civil service employees, the oath is set forth by law in 5 U.S. Code § 3331, which reads as follows:

“An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.””

The President is also required by the Constitution to take an Oath of Office. Article 2, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitution prescribes the Oath. It says, “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”


2,066 posted on 06/06/2020 8:50:52 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2036 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

Yeah, but like she says: “ I’m like the tattooed, pierced, art school attending, life long dem, former planned parenthood supporting, Bernie caucusing kinda girl. I’m still sassy but pretty dang sure if I can change, anyone can.”

The amount of positivity and support for President Trump without the griping and negativity that has permeated FR on her TL is really refreshing. She joined Twitter in May and has over 4000 followers already, many also recently redpilled as a result of coronavirus and how they became aware of Trump’s leadership. Someone asked what caused her to change:

“For Bernie people, we got cheated & saw dems would choose their candidate, not the people. Corona smelled fishy so I went down the Rabbit Hole. I have been wondering as a mother where the kids were disappearing to. I’d rather know than be ignorant. So that’s it in a nutshell.”

Besides, I’ve always been a sucker for that hippy dippy stuff ;-)


2,067 posted on 06/06/2020 8:53:24 PM PDT by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2058 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

archive everything.


2,068 posted on 06/06/2020 8:54:52 PM PDT by CJ Wolf ( #wwg1wga #Godwins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2065 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Help me out...I should save stuff? what kind?


2,069 posted on 06/06/2020 8:56:08 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2065 | View Replies]

To: bigbob; BiggBob; little jeremiah; Miss Didi; bitt; bagster; ransomnote

2,070 posted on 06/06/2020 8:56:20 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2067 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

You are cruel.


2,071 posted on 06/06/2020 8:57:15 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2070 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

Mark


2,072 posted on 06/06/2020 8:57:42 PM PDT by Bigg Red (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1320 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf

2,073 posted on 06/06/2020 8:58:10 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2025 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Now I can’t unsee that..


2,074 posted on 06/06/2020 8:58:35 PM PDT by pnz1 ("These people have gone stone-cold crazy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2071 | View Replies]

To: BiggBob
And? Does that mean that they will only use the UCMJ punitive articles? I hope not. Forfeiture of all pay/allowances isn't very stiff. Art 88 mentioned; the penalty: dismissal, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to one (1) year are the possible penalties for a violation of Article 88. Oh noes!!!

I believe military tribunals will be held, but that is NOT similar to MCM. The rules of evidence for CM are in line with Federal courts. Forget the majority of the NSA intel in that case. Feds officials working for the military are subject to the UCMJ already.

The PROCEDURES for CM are the basis of military tribunals and commissions, not thankfully the rules of evidence, nor are the charges limited to the punitive articles of the UCMJ.

CIVILIANS except as noted above are not subject to the UCMJ. Martial Law and proceedings under the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC) will almost definitely include 'civilians' since the opposing side in this war are almost exclusively non-state actors resulting in them being UNLAWFUL COMBATANTS. Amongst the other things you can't do as a civilian even with Constitutional rights is wage war without state sponsorship or recognition. Those that do, are UNLAWFUL COMBATANTS IAW LOAC. Those are what Q is referring to. Not prosecutions under a system used for the discipline of the US armed forces and others noted in Article 2 of the UCMJ.

Kavanaugh wasn't questioned about the UCMJ, that discussion was about LOAC.

Sorry I won't do colored font, but I will yell in caps instead. Get it now.

2,075 posted on 06/06/2020 8:58:42 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2036 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

though it’s not mentioned in the ruling, https://www.abajournal.com/files/BlackLivesMatter.pdf
i believe that not having its own donations helps keep BLM from being an entity....the reason a fed judge ruled BLM can’t be sued.

https://www.npr.org/2017/09/30/554789654/judge-rules-that-black-lives-matter-cannot-be-sued

And that judge’s ruling should cost BLM when suing President Trump.
https://nonprofitquarterly.org/blm-and-aclu-sue-trump-administration-for-violence-against-dc-protesters/

If you can’t be sued because you are not considered and “entity”, you should be prohibited from suing anybody for the same reason.


2,076 posted on 06/06/2020 8:59:10 PM PDT by stylin19a ( 2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1622 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

2075


2,077 posted on 06/06/2020 9:03:23 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2066 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

#HippieDippiesWelcome!


2,078 posted on 06/06/2020 9:06:17 PM PDT by Miss Didi ("After all...tomorrow is another day." Scarlett O'Hara, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2067 | View Replies]

To: Califreak

Still heartbreaking that they’ve been told no ammo and soft covers only.
***************************************************************************
I’d be tempted to sew something a bit hard in the middle of some soft foam to wear under that soft hat. This is ridiculous.


2,079 posted on 06/06/2020 9:07:20 PM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1962 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas
These screamers screech like BobCat Goldthwait and Sam Kinnison all rolled into one Karen.

I think if that were me in that car, I'da told the little ho, 'F no, C', and bopped her in her eyeball for getting in my white space.


2,080 posted on 06/06/2020 9:09:49 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2060 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,041-2,0602,061-2,0802,081-2,100 ... 2,141-2,157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson