Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

4 Feminist Lies That Are Making Women Miserable
The Federalist ^ | 11/12/2019 | Suzanne Venker

Posted on 11/12/2019 10:42:04 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Twenty years ago, I wrote my first book about why women can’t “have it all,” or at least all at once, despite what the culture tells them. (Hint: It’s because no one, male or female, can perform two full-time jobs simultaneously without the bottom falling out.)

At the time, the so-called Mommy Wars were raging. Women everywhere who’d been sold a bill of goods by their feminist mothers and mentors were either lamenting the futility of being able to successfully work full-time outside the home while maintaining a healthy marriage and family life, or they were defending their choice to work full-time by insisting children do fine in round-the-clock substitute care.

Since then, the messages to women about how to have a happy life—as it relates to love and sex, work and family—have merely served to make women miserable. Not only are they unhappier than their mothers and grandmothers ever were, they’re significantly more stressed out; much more so than men.

None of this has done anything to help men and women find their way to one another. Dating in America is all but dead, and marriage is at an all-time low. While there’s more than one reason for this sad state of affairs, at the heart of it are the lies feminists have been telling for years. Here are four, in no particular order.

1. Women Don’t Need Men

It started with a seemingly comical phrase Gloria Steinem didn’t coin but repeatedly used during the height of the 1960s feminist movement: “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.” It’s still alive and well today, whether it’s Jennifer Aniston talking about how women “don’t have to fiddle with a man to have that child” or Emma Watson talking about “self-partnering.” Over time, as women began to make their own money and take advantage of the newfound birth control pill, they came to believe that women don’t need men.

They were wrong. Biologically, women are wired to depend on men—regardless of much life has changed. Most women still want to be mothers, and when they do they become vulnerable. Even today, women know instinctively that they will ultimately need a man if they want to have a family and if they want the option of being home at all, if only for a period of time.

Indeed, research shows that what matters most to women—even to those who are economically independent—is knowing they have a man on whom they can rely. It’s the feeling of being safe and in good hands—yes, even financially—that matters most. That is what’s known as hypergamy, and it is alive and well in 2019.

2. Men and Women Are the Same, Or Gender Is a Social Construct

The precise moment in history when the relationship between the sexes took a nosedive is when women began to have sex like a man—casually, with no strings attached—under the guise that women are no different from men and are thus just as capable of having casual sex. Consider this ridiculous Bustle article asserting, based on a dubious study, that men and women are now equally likely to pursue a hookup if approached the right way.

From college campuses to our nation’s boardrooms, many women today have learned to pursue sex the way men often do: no commitment necessary. And they’re getting burned.

If there’s anything that proves this in spades, it’s the so-called campus rape crisis and the excesses of Me Too. For if it were true that women are “just like men” in their ability to disentangle sex and emotion, why would campus flings and office dalliances become a cause for the courts rather than a welcome ride?

It’s not just our sexuality that confirms the disparate natures of women and men. Parenting proves it in spades. Once a baby arrives, a woman’s nurturing gene almost always kicks in. Providing for her child emotionally is her first instinct, which is why going back to work so soon is heart-wrenching for mothers.

A father’s reaction is different: his first instinct is to support the family financially. It is not his sole contribution, but it’s first on his list. Simply put, that men and women may both be capable of performing identical tasks doesn’t mean they want to do them with equal fervor. Desire matters.

3. The Biological Clock Isn’t Real

The biological clock may be politically inconvenient, but that doesn’t make it any less real. The ideal age for a woman to get pregnant is 25, noted Gillian Lockwood, medical director at the Midland Fertility Clinic in the U.K., recently: “The bleak reality is that the chance of IVF working with your own eggs once you are 40 is absolutely abysmal…In what other branch of medicine would we let, yet alone encourage, patients to pay for an elective operation with a less than five percent chance of working?”

Because of this, it stands to reason that men can postpone marriage longer than women can. But we don’t tell women this. Instead, we pretend they can map out their lives with career at the center, as men do, as though they won’t hit a point in which their ability to conceive will invariably clash with a career. Articles abound with the goal to obscure the biological reality that it’s easier for women to have babies in their twenties and early thirties.

We lie to women, in other words, to further a political agenda. In doing so, feminists get what they want—for women to reject maternal desire and to instead produce in the marketplace—but women don’t.

Indeed, after decades of following the cultural script, women can often no longer find husbands. Or they can’t have babies. Or if they do get married and have babies, they can’t stay home with them because they mapped out a life that supported an entirely different goal.

4. A Career Is More Meaningful Than Marriage and Children

Of all the lies feminists tell, the idea that career success is more fulfilling than marriage and family is by far the greatest. It is almost impossible to convey the depth of this lie, for it too began in the 1960s, this time with Betty Friedan’s insistence that being a wife and mother is akin to being in a “comfortable concentration camp.” Since that time, American women have been walloped with a steady diet of words and images that drive Friedan’s argument home.

Humans are pack animals: we need to feel part of the group to feel good about ourselves. Some of us are content to stand apart from the crowd, but most are not. Ergo, cultural messages matter.

Women are surprised to discover that work isn’t nearly as satisfying as they were led to believe.

Since mothering is no longer revered or understood to be something a woman would want to do, let alone should do, women are surprised to discover how heart-wrenching it is to leave their babies and return to work. They’re surprised to discover that work isn’t nearly as satisfying as they were led to believe.

This same sense of unease is felt by single women who can’t find a man with whom to settle down. Careers aren’t fulfilling at all, it turns out, if you wind up in bed at night alone.

Too many women map out their lives with work at the center and eventually wish they hadn’t. Sadly, my inbox is loaded with emails from women who tell me they wished someone had told them this sooner.

So, here I am saying it as loudly as I can. Women have been lied to for years, and that’s why they’re so unhappy. There is only one solution. Flip your priorities—put love and family, not work, at the center—and you will win in the game of life. That’s what I did, and it made all the difference.


Suzanne Venker is an author, columnist, and relationship coach. She helps women let go of feminist beliefs that undermine their ability to create happy lives and find lasting love with men. Her newest book, "Women Who Win at Love: How to Build a Relationship That Lasts," published in October 2019.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: feminism; lies; mgtow; misery; pua; redpill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: SeekAndFind

I would add lie #5

That after putting casual sex and career first, a woman is going to be able to get a good man to settle down with in their 30s......ie the 4 happy endings for all 4 women on Sex in the City. Sorry. No. That’s not reality. Look at the numbers. Want a good man? Get him in your 20s. Do not waste your youth.


41 posted on 11/12/2019 1:16:59 PM PST by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

The Wall and infertility don’t care.
Neither will being 55 when your kids are in high school.


42 posted on 11/12/2019 1:19:06 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Going back to work too soon...”

Home with kids “at least for a period of time...”

Even this article is buying the lie.

My kids needed me in the home in their teens, too. Different needs but needs just the same. My place was in the home and the whole family benefited from me being there. My city benefitted. My church benefitted. The whole world benefitted.


43 posted on 11/12/2019 1:19:37 PM PST by Persevero (Desmond is not -Amazing- Desmond is -Abused-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All

The MAN-HATING attitude of all too many of the LOUD-mouthed “modern” American “feminists” is a MAJOR reason that many American Servicemen & EX-GIs are LOOKING ABROAD for a WIFE. = In Eastern Europe & Asia, there are a GREAT MANY smart/lovely/talented/educated/ladylike “traditional women”, who WANT a traditional marriage & (GASP!) desire to bear/raise his children.
(My LADY was born in Portland, OR 2 weeks after her parents FLED to the USA, to avoid religious/political persecution BUT she is as much a traditionally “old-school” lady as any bride, who was born abroad.)

God willing, I’m KEEPING HER for the rest of my life, as she is what The Bible calls, “- - - a pearl beyond price”.

Yours, TMN78247


44 posted on 11/12/2019 1:21:05 PM PST by TMN78247 ("VICTORY or DEATH", William Barrett Travis, LtCol, comdt., Fortress of the Alamo, Bejar, 1836)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

There are many American women FReepers sir. Shall we make ugly accusations against all American men? I won’t.


45 posted on 11/12/2019 1:21:06 PM PST by Persevero (Desmond is not -Amazing- Desmond is -Abused-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

“There’s no going back.”

Oh yes there is. Be the change you want to see

There is a disturbing amount of defeatism on FR


46 posted on 11/12/2019 1:22:33 PM PST by Persevero (Desmond is not -Amazing- Desmond is -Abused-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
It started with a seemingly comical phrase Gloria Steinem didn’t coin but repeatedly used during the height of the 1960s feminist movement: “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.”

Gloria Steinem always got an undeserved free pass on that quote. Did any of the fawning "journalists" who interviewed her over the years ever ask why she didn't live her own life that way? Not needing men? GS's whole schtick was making promiscuity fashionable. She may not have needed a man for financial security, but otherwise ….

47 posted on 11/12/2019 1:22:45 PM PST by sphinx (q2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

The Brady Bunch situation was due to mutual bereavement and was a wonderful illustration of bereaved spouses finding each other and providing for their kids.


48 posted on 11/12/2019 1:24:08 PM PST by Persevero (Desmond is not -Amazing- Desmond is -Abused-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: malach

Eh ???

Women had been voting for FIFTY YEARS when the so called “feminist movement” started...


49 posted on 11/12/2019 1:30:19 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

And having going to the principal’s office when they act out.


50 posted on 11/12/2019 1:30:34 PM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

Have I heard you speak out against women needing men like a fish needs a bicycle for the past forty eight years?

That’s what is called a prerequisite.

Barring that, spare us all your hypocrisy. Or does that only become offensive when it gets turned around the other way?

Feel free to enlighten us all.


51 posted on 11/12/2019 1:30:49 PM PST by MrEdd (Caveat Emptors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Personally I blame The Brady Bunch. Chop it up, mix it up, dice and splice your family. The kids will be fine....NOT!

In real life, if I was the father of three boys, two of whom were just entering adolescence, I would have had grave misgivings about having them share a house with young adolescent girls.

52 posted on 11/12/2019 1:37:02 PM PST by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
But they understand how to manipulate women into bed without commitment, and thats a whole lot easier when a well starts spurting out a spring of women who see commitment as a bad thing.

Women would be better off getting married early (22 or younger), having their kids in their 20's, and then going to work in their 30's.

It would work out better than trying to have kids in their 40's.

53 posted on 11/12/2019 1:41:25 PM PST by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Persevero

It was propaganda.


54 posted on 11/12/2019 1:41:48 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: sphinx
"Did any of the fawning "journalists" who interviewed her over the years ever ask why she didn't live her own life that way? Not needing men?"

Gloria Steinem married Christian Bale's dad, who had big bucks.

Would you expect any thing less from one our elite?

Not like Gloria Steinem is going to marry some schmo.

No sir, she wanted that "security". A man with *lots* of money.

55 posted on 11/12/2019 2:05:33 PM PST by boop ("I've always hated Nazis")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

A call to singleness is fine.

If and when marriage and kids enter the picture priorities must change. For the good of all.


56 posted on 11/12/2019 2:09:02 PM PST by Persevero (Desmond is not -Amazing- Desmond is -Abused-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; Persevero

It’s just reality. In the last forty years the economy has restructured in such a way that most families need two incomes. Same thing is happening in the other developed economies. It would take a lot more than changes in attitudes to go back to the one breadwinner model.


57 posted on 11/12/2019 2:09:43 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: shanover

“The left successfully destroyed womankind...”

They have not destroyed me or my daughters.


58 posted on 11/12/2019 2:09:57 PM PST by Persevero (Desmond is not -Amazing- Desmond is -Abused-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If any young girls are reading this, listen up:

Most jobs suck. Sayings like “hump day” and “thank God it’s Friday” did not get invented because people love their jobs.

Fertility begins to decline around age 28. Just because some Hollywood actress had a baby at age 44 does not mean all women can. That Hollywood actress is not mentioning that she used an egg donor and/or a surrogate mother.

I was in my doctor’s office and saw a poster saying that one of the things that puts a woman at higher risk for breast cancer is NOT having a baby, and breastfeeding that baby, by age 29. (Breast cancer used to be called “the nuns’ disease.”) Are young women being told this? I doubt it.


59 posted on 11/12/2019 2:11:59 PM PST by Nea Wood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

Reality is a factor but to some degree we construct it.

My husband and I were seriously poor a lot. I’ve never owned a home. Etc.

But our convictions were such that although I brought in extra money with “at home “ work (which took its toll) we battled through and raised our own children.

Who have turned out fantastic and some of whom are currently raising THEIR kids well. All of my DILs are stay at home moms.

Priorities. Of course reality enters in. But usually when there is a will there is a way.


60 posted on 11/12/2019 2:14:38 PM PST by Persevero (Desmond is not -Amazing- Desmond is -Abused-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson