Cumming added: Within the next 10 years we will probably be whole genome sequencing 100 per cent of the population who wish to be sequenced."
1 posted on
06/01/2019 5:26:32 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
MGTOW.
Paternity/dna tests should just be mandatory for every birth.
2 posted on
06/01/2019 5:29:58 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
3 posted on
06/01/2019 5:31:34 PM PDT by
Rio
To: BenLurkin
Same as it ever was, all throughout human history.
4 posted on
06/01/2019 5:31:36 PM PDT by
Windflier
(Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
To: BenLurkin
5 posted on
06/01/2019 5:33:29 PM PDT by
Moorings
To: BenLurkin
If true, then these mothers are sad examples of women, unless they were raped and they honestly dont know.
If from sleeping with multiple men, they are, or were, sick.
6 posted on
06/01/2019 5:33:55 PM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: BenLurkin
Are we talking fathers or sperm donors?
I’ve seen great dads who aren’t always the biological father.
And biological fathers who are rotten dads.
7 posted on
06/01/2019 5:34:17 PM PDT by
mewzilla
(Break out the mustard seeds.)
To: BenLurkin
It will be higher than that, because close relatives to anybody sequenced will be sequenced by default.
9 posted on
06/01/2019 5:44:55 PM PDT by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death by cultsther)
To: BenLurkin
10 posted on
06/01/2019 5:46:33 PM PDT by
SkyDancer
( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
To: BenLurkin
Real father is mother’s husband.
The headline means biological father.
11 posted on
06/01/2019 5:48:53 PM PDT by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: BenLurkin
Imagine it’s higher here. I
13 posted on
06/01/2019 5:56:06 PM PDT by
aquila48
To: BenLurkin
That makes them fully qualified to run as a democrat candidate for president in 2008!
14 posted on
06/01/2019 5:56:38 PM PDT by
Caipirabob
(Communists...Socialists...Fascists & AntiFa...Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: BenLurkin
Chances are very good that the father’s name is Mohammad, but as to who he actually is, well ... that’s a mystery.
15 posted on
06/01/2019 6:06:03 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
To: BenLurkin
Next they will be telling mothers that the baby they delivered is not theirs!
To: BenLurkin
I note the professor's last name with interest.
BTW, is that why the children are all named Mahmoud, as a precaution?
21 posted on
06/01/2019 7:06:06 PM PDT by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
To: BenLurkin

and they thought blue bloods were a problem, mud blood is coming...
22 posted on
06/01/2019 7:57:39 PM PDT by
Chode
( WeÂ’re America, Bitch!)
To: BenLurkin
Also, the chimeras might be more common then expected.
23 posted on
06/01/2019 9:30:21 PM PDT by
erkelly
To: BenLurkin
Also, the chimeras might be more common then expected. In light of these stats (4%) the next step should be to determine if the DNA shows the father is a close male relative of the father. In that case, the father is likely the father, but he is a chimera.
24 posted on
06/01/2019 9:35:59 PM PDT by
erkelly
To: BenLurkin
25 posted on
06/01/2019 9:42:25 PM PDT by
morphing libertarian
( Use Comey's Report, Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
To: BenLurkin
To: All
Heck, the way things are going, it won’t be long before the majority won’t know who their mother was.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson