Q Anon: (4/12/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qntmpkts.keybase.pub ^ | 4/12/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is absolutely the best place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. Today, only Qanonposts.com is working for me but weeks ago I was advised that it was hacked:

https://qanonposts.com

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link: Email support for President Trump

[STARLIT]

When you post a twitter video and copy the box needed for posting..it provides the information description. But it not always gives the reader the entire description. So to make sure I post the twitter person I’m getting my information from..I give them the credit due. I hope I have explained myself.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

Hemming and hawing? More like harumphing.
https://youtu.be/JN99jshaQbY

[generally]

Agree with greeneyes.

But I find it surprising that Trump would be suckered by this. So I am wondering if there is yet another layer to this onion. Otherwise Trump is only playing 2D chess.

I listened again to his speech from last night. It was very deliberate and specific.

Perhaps it is NOT Assad that he is going after so much as the chemicals and factories. Perhaps something else that is IN those factories. That is the only thing that would make sense to me.

[little jeremiah]

Thankfully, whatever happens with mj is up to the DoJ.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™

[STARLIT]

Yes, but remember she does live down in the media sewer and thinking outside of the 4 AM script is impossible.

[little jeremiah]

My POV is that the military has no duty to share certain info with reporters. Such as was RU informed or not. Not the reporters (who are mostly enemies) duty or right to know military niceties, plans etc.

[bagster]

He IS complaining it wasn’t *enough*, wants boots on the ground.

Okay, let me rephrase then. His clamoring for escalation now looks insane. And SHOULD alienate both sides of this issue.

There are two sides to this thing now. The "strikes were too much and pull out now" side. And the "strikes were just right and pull out now" side. Both sides agree we should pull out now.

McCain represents the whackadoo side calling for War with Russia.

The man is a hobbit. He, like Iran, is the cheese, and he stands alone, apart from rational thinking.

Learn when you're beaten, dopey man.

[StormFlag]

Yes, but always a pleasure to watch Ambassador Haley. She is speaking now.

[ichabod1]

Considering everybody thought TV was heavily censored back then, it was amazing how much they were actually free to say. Could never do that today.

[bagster]

Haha. Okay!

:)

[generally]

Thanks for reposting. Didn’t see it last week.

Super important, IMO.

[generally]

Who is that? (Lyn de Rothschild maybe?)

Totally creepy.

Who would paint something that sick? And then who would buy it / hang it?!!!

Disgusting beyond words.

[ichabod1]

I consider the tweets to be diplomatic communiques straight from the Top.

[edzo4]

I believe marijuana is less harmful then both cigarettes and alcohol, both of which are taxed and regulated now. I am fine with letting the states decide as well as the adults in those state if THEY choose to consume weed. I would prefer the money spent and jail cells used currently on low level marijuana users and dealers to be spent on opiod abuse and far more dangerous drugs like fentanyl, heroin and cocaine. If they also reduce the amount of taxes I’m forced to pay because of those that are voluntarily offering to be taxed for their use of marijuana, that is a win win as far as i’m concerned.

[bagster]

Boots on the ground

Hats for bats.

Keeps bats warm.

[STARLIT]

Our President isn’t being suckered as you suggested..he’s several moves ahead of you. Pardon by bluntness. The chemical areas were most likely set up by our Deep State. So blowing up the areas sends a message to “Don’t Say His Name” and all the others we’re fighting ..we are one MOVE AWAY! I pretty much believe Russia is well aware of our situation and the Deep State. The bombings were giving more than one message.

[STARLIT]

Agree because we well know the media if given the truth they wouldn’t report it anyway. LOL Good morning.

[generally]

I have to say that on the surface I don’t like the strikes. I’ll stop short of “condemning” because I am waiting to see how all this plays out and what the real purpose is.

I am hoping/guessing that there is something more that we don’t know about the targets. On the plus side, these strikes seemed very “surgical”, very narrowly and specifically directed. I am wondering what chemicals were there or what else might have been there that we have taken out.

On the minus side, you’ve posted in 1349 a list of globalists who are benefitting from this.

So in post 1358, you seem to be for the strikes in post 1349 you are implying (or maybe I am mistakenly inferring) that you are against them.

Can you explain?

I will be the first to admit there are many factors that I’m unaware of.

.... waiting for the POTUS weekly address mentioned in Q1124.

[ichabod1]

Of course he knows, he’s not stupid, he’s a stable genius, and besides, we’re pretty sure he checks up on this thread, so he knows what’s going on.

These are political equations. If he doesn’t strike, maybe UK and France will go instead and will go after Assad, who we know didn’t do it, rather than the perps, because they’re the ones who paid for the false flag. Maybe he’s protecting the white hats in Syria by bombing abandoned runways and such. So many unknown unknowns. It’s fun to speculate.