I have to say that on the surface I don’t like the strikes. I’ll stop short of “condemning” because I am waiting to see how all this plays out and what the real purpose is.
I am hoping/guessing that there is something more that we don’t know about the targets. On the plus side, these strikes seemed very “surgical”, very narrowly and specifically directed. I am wondering what chemicals were there or what else might have been there that we have taken out.
On the minus side, you’ve posted in 1349 a list of globalists who are benefitting from this.
So in post 1358, you seem to be for the strikes in post 1349 you are implying (or maybe I am mistakenly inferring) that you are against them.
Can you explain?
I will be the first to admit there are many factors that I’m unaware of.
.... waiting for the POTUS weekly address mentioned in Q1124.
1) The strikes do seem surgical, but 77 missiles on the first target - that seems like a hella lot of TNT.
2) President’s weekly address (used to be called President’s Weekly Radio Address) usually comes out Saturday morning so shouldn’t be long to wait.
For the strikes, now turn most of the party around and head home this instant.
Deep state wants boots on the ground for servicing O&G needs.