Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You could fit the entire human race into a sugar cube — and 13 other facts...
Business Insider ^ | Aug. 23, 2016 | Ali Sundermier

Posted on 08/23/2016 10:34:57 AM PDT by Heartlander

The universe is a crazy place... It's full of exploding stars and immortal jellyfish and it's been kicking around for almost 14 billion years.

Here are 14 awesome facts to put it all into perspective.

If you unraveled all of the DNA in your body, it would span 34 billion miles, reaching to Pluto (2.66 billion miles away) and back ... 13 times.

Source: Business Insider

In fact, your body contains cosmic relics from the creation of the universe. Almost all of your hydrogen atoms were formed in the Big Bang, about 13.7 billion years ago.

Source: PBS

And when you tune your TV between stations, a small percentage of the static you see is actually the afterglow of the Big Bang.

Source: NASA

Light from some stars takes so long to travel to our eyes that when you look at the star-speckled night sky you're actually peering deep into the past. NASA's Hubble Telescope can look as far back as 100 million years ago.

Source: NASA

Almost all of ordinary matter (99.9999999% of it) is empty space. If you took out all of the space in our atoms, the entire human race (all 7 billion of us) would fit into the volume of a sugar cube.

Source: Symmetry

Many of the atoms you're made of, from the calcium in your bones to the iron in your blood, were brewed up in the heart of an exploding star billions of years ago.

Source: PBS

Forty-seven years ago, humankind took its first steps on the moon — and the bootprints will probably still be there a million years from now. That's because the moon has no atmosphere, so there's no wind or water to sweep through and erase the marks.

Source: Space.com

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Education; Science; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: FredZarguna
True, but not part of Quantum Mechanics. The interchangeability of matter and energy is a consequence of the Special Theory of Relativity, which is not a Quantum Mechanical theory, and which predates Quantum Mechanics by about two decades.

In practice, it's both Quantum Mechanics and Special Relativity. E.g.:

Why does a photon colliding with an atomic nucleus cause pair production?


41 posted on 08/23/2016 11:45:25 AM PDT by snarkpup (Socialism causes the worst people to become in charge - if they aren't already.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
Whatever the answer......someone is watching. Youbetcha.


42 posted on 08/23/2016 11:45:35 AM PDT by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Not all of our atoms are as old as the universe, because some of the heavier atoms in our bodies formed in stars younger than the universe, mostly iron and other heavy elements. However, it is true that all the *matter* in our bodies is as old as the universe.


43 posted on 08/23/2016 11:49:03 AM PDT by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stremba
False - conversion of mass to energy and vice-versa is not part of quantum mechanics.

I didn't say it wasn't part of Quantum Mechanics. To the extent that the Special Theory is correct, Quantum Mechanics must include relativity, or be mistaken.

[In fact, the Schroedinger Equation does not include it, and is "wrong." It wasn't until Paul A.M. Dirac formulated an explicitly relativistic version of the wave equation that Quantum Mechanics included pair production, negative energy, spin, or antimatter. ALL are relativistic effects.]

The fundamental fact is that mass-energy equivalence is a relativistic effect and is present in classical mechanics (with relativity) and classical electrodynamics; and Quantum Mechanics is not required to have mass/energy conversion in the low energy realm. Lots of solid state physicists, electrical engineers and chemists just use Schroedinger and get along quite well without it. I would refer you to either Bjorken and Drell's Relativistic Quantum Fields or their equally excellent Relativistic Quantum Mechanics, two classic texts which are sitting about two feet away from me as I type for a complete discussion.]

44 posted on 08/23/2016 11:56:00 AM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

i am not putting my head in the sand...

but my answer is still relevant today.

God is always the answer.

have a great day.


45 posted on 08/23/2016 11:58:55 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: snarkpup
It's not both. Please read my follow-up to another poster.

Mass/Energy equivalence exists in classical mechanics and electrodynamics. You don't need pair production to to have it in the theory, and in fact, in the Schroedinger formulation of QM -- which is NON-relativistic -- it doesn't exist.

Ultimately, all antimatter in quantum mechanics is a result of the fact that you must symmetrize the field equations in order to make them Lorentz Invariant. Quantum mechanical theories that are not covariant have no mass-energy equivalence, do not have spin or pair production, and are not relativistic.

[All you are saying is that "correct" formulations of QM/QFT are inherently relativistic, which is true.]

46 posted on 08/23/2016 12:02:12 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dayglored; treetopsandroofs; Heartlander

Not picking nits but the limit that the Hubble has actually seen and been verified at is about 300 million years short of the origin (13.4 bn years.)


47 posted on 08/23/2016 12:05:22 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r; dp0622
I'm sorry, we cannot accept that answer. Your answer must be in the form of a question...


48 posted on 08/23/2016 12:10:11 PM PDT by Shanghai Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

That came out wrong and I apologize. My fingers talk faster than my mind thinks!

God IS always the answer but I think he enjoys letting us discover and learn things (which in our whole lifetime will be .00000000000000000000000000000001% of what there is to know :)


49 posted on 08/23/2016 12:11:55 PM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

I certainly believe in God. And I believe in science, which was created by God.

How bored would we be if God gave us nothing to discover!!!!


50 posted on 08/23/2016 12:15:35 PM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

This is by far the most fascinating science article I’ve read in a while.

Thank you very much for posting it.

It stretches the imagination and the mind!!!


51 posted on 08/23/2016 12:17:48 PM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

“You could”. Wrong. There is no way for that to happen. The “IF” is impossible, so it’s foolishness to talk about what “could” happen. This is not science.


52 posted on 08/23/2016 12:19:22 PM PDT by I want the USA back (The media is acting full-on as the Democratic PartyÂ’s press agency now: Robert Spencer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
"What is this place we are in? It looks pretty big"

"We are standing inside a life-scale model of the Pantheon. Erected in 128 AD by the Roman Empire, it held the record for the world's largest domed building for well over a thousand years. It is still the largest unreinforced solid concrete dome in the world."

Then something very small, practically invisible, buzzed past Keiichi's ear. "Hey, there's a gnat in here, I think."

"Yes. Actually there are 92 of them."

"Why 92?"

"Because a uranium atom has 92 electrons. This is a representation of a uranium atom, specifically uranium-238. It's a simple Bohr model. With 92 protons and 146 neutrons it is the largest stable natural atom in the natural universe, with a half-life of over 4.5 billion years. Anything larger is made artificially in nuclear reactors, nuclear explosions, or as short-lived radioisotopes in supernova blasts."

"I see. So where is it? The atom, I mean?"

"You're standing inside it."

"Huh? You mean this whole huge volume of space is.."

"Yes. This whole space represents a single atom."

"But wait, where's the rest of it?"

"You mean the nucleus?"

"Yeah. I don't see it anywhere."

"It's up there." She pointed. "The center of the atom." They floated upward. "It has a diameter of 15 femtometers, making it larger than any other naturally occurring atomic nucleus. This is as big as it gets. See? It's right over here."

"Where? Past that little marble thing?"

"Keiichi, it is that little marble thing."

He bent over and stared at it. He could barely see it. A bit over a centimeter wide, it was buzzing and jostling around like an angry hive of tiny bees. All 238 of them packed in such a tiny volume.

"That's it? In this whole huge dome?"

"Yes."

"But it's practically empty!"

"Yep."

"So physical matter is basically.. a whole lot of nothing?"

"Yeah, pretty much."

She poked her finger into his shoulder. "When I press my finger into you like that, it is actually the electroweak force that is causing the resistance that is stopping my finger. There is no actual physical contact anywhere, in the sense of particles getting close enough to actually touch. The nuclear forces prevent it. So in a sense I am not actually 'touching' you at all."

"I see."

"Now let's go up to the opposite end of the scale." Everything shifted.

They were now floating in a black expanse. "This is intergalactic space. More specifically, it is the volume of space in-between galactic superclusters. It constitutes over 99% of the volume of the observable universe."

"A whole lot of nuthin'."

"Yep. The universe is appallingly empty, on both scales. The physical structure of the universe is actually very frothy, sort of like soapy suds when you take a bath. The galactic superclusters are all clumped along very thin strips and point junctions that interconnect the frothy soap bubbles."

"And the inside of all those huge soap bubbles.."

".. is empty. As empty as it gets. For a billion light years in every direction."

"More nuthin'."

"Yes. Now let's look at an intermediate scale." Everything shifted again.

"This is a scaled representation of your sun, Sol." Keiichi saw a tiny dot about the size of a period on a printed page. "The nearest neighboring sun would be Alpha Centauri, about 4.24 light-years away, over there." She pointed.

"Where?"

"Let's go see."

They had travelled about 2 kilometers. He asked, "Here?"

"No."

2 kilometers more. "More?" "Uh-huh."

Again. "You're kidding."

This repeated a few more times.

After about 14 kilometers they finally stopped. Another tiny dot the size of a period.

She said, "If your sun was scaled up to 1 foot radius, Alpha Centauri would be over 10,000 miles away."

Keiichi shook his head. "This is nuts. Space is so empty."

"Yes. So let me now ask you, given what you have learned, would you consider a random meteor, a lump of rock, in the great scheme of things, to be something rather special?"

"Yeah."

"Rare?"

"Of course."

"Perhaps even precious?"

"Well, I sort of see what you mean... Anything at all would be pretty special given the complete emptiness surrounding us."

"Good, remember that. Now let's see something even more rare." Another shift.

There were floating next to what looked like a large irregular semi-translucent sphere. Several snake-like entities were heading towards it. "This is the moment of conception. Between 100 million to a half-billion sperm cells are all swimming frantically to find this, the egg. Only one will succeed."

"Heh. So you have better odds of winning the Power Ball lottery jackpot than a sperm has of fertilizing that egg."

"Yes."

"That is one lucky sperm. You know, it seems like all of the interesting things in the universe are rare. Special."

"Yep. All life on Earth exists in a supremely thin layer, thinner than skin of an onion on the same scale. The bulk of the Earth's mass, 99.999..% of it, is dead. See a pattern here?"

"God seems to like rarity."

"Yes."

"But why? Why not simply create a universe that is completely alive? Make everything living? Why is it all so empty, so dead?"

"Keiichi, that is a very good question. I wish I had an answer for you, but I don't. My personal theory is that it is because it makes those very few things in the vastness of the universe even more precious, even more special..."

Source

53 posted on 08/23/2016 12:29:56 PM PDT by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander

7 billion humans in a sugar cube.

Yes. A sugar cube that has the same mass as those 7 billion human beings.

That’s a pretty heavy sugar cube, buddy.


54 posted on 08/23/2016 1:01:30 PM PDT by angryoldfatman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
If we lost all the dead space inside our atoms, we would each be able to fit into a particle of lead dust, and the entire human race would fit into the volume of a sugar cube.

I don't know about that, I've seen lots of email slide show photos of Walmart shoppers would debunk that theory......

55 posted on 08/23/2016 1:10:26 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (If only Hillary had married OJ instead......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
> Not picking nits but the limit that the Hubble has actually seen and been verified at is about 300 million years short of the origin (13.4 bn years.)

Sounds about right. Nit is hereby declared successfully picked. :-)

56 posted on 08/23/2016 1:32:06 PM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
Matter cannot be created nor destroyed - elementary Physics

matter can be changed into energy, though, E=MC2 (squared). Atoms can be split, resulting in two new atoms. Atoms can be fused, resulting in one new atom. An atom's electron can be lost or gained, resulting in an ion. Does this count? We'll let that one go.

57 posted on 08/23/2016 1:34:30 PM PDT by chesley (The right to protest is not the right to disrupt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs

HAH! I forgot about that episode!


58 posted on 08/23/2016 1:48:58 PM PDT by freepertoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
If you unraveled all of the DNA in your body, it would span 34 billion miles, reaching to Pluto (2.66 billion miles away) and back ... 13 times.

Probably only 3.4 billion considering 90% of 'your' cells are comprised of the various parasites, virii, and bacteria that call the human body home.

59 posted on 08/23/2016 2:42:42 PM PDT by pa_dweller (Let the baby seal clubbing begin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622; teeman8r

This believing physical chemist is with you! Few sins are worse than self-imposed ignorance in the name of “religion”.


60 posted on 08/23/2016 5:16:25 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias; "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson