What John Adams Knew -- Donald Trump: the populist demogogue John Adams anticipated

National Review ^ | 3-18-16 | Kevin Williamson

[afraidfortherepublic]

There is a line from John Adams of which conservatives, particularly those of a moralistic bent, are fond: "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people." The surrounding prose is quoted much less frequently, and it is stern stuff dealing with one of Adams’s great fears - one that is particularly relevant to this moment in our history.

John Adams hated democracy and he feared what was known in the language of the time as "passion." Adams's famous assessment: "I do not say that democracy has been more pernicious on the whole, and in the long run, than monarchy or aristocracy. Democracy has never been and never can be so durable as aristocracy or monarchy; but while it lasts, it is more bloody than either."

Democracy, he wrote, "never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide. It is in vain to say that democracy is less vain, less proud, less selfish, less ambitious, or less avaricious than aristocracy or monarchy. It is not true, in fact, and nowhere appears in history. Those passions are the same in all men, under all forms of simple government, and when unchecked, produce the same effects of fraud, violence, and cruelty." If you are wondering why that pedantic conservative friend of yours corrects you every time you describe our form of government as democracy - "It’s a republic!" he will insist - that is why. Your pedantic conservative friend probably is supporting Ted Cruz. The democratic passions that so terrified Adams have filled the sails of Donald Trump. Trumpkin democracy is the democracy that John Adams warned us about. At some point within the past few decades (it is difficult to identify the exact genesis) the rhetorical

At some point within the past few decades (it is difficult to identify the exact genesis) the rhetorical affectation of politicians' presuming to speak for "We the People" became fashionable. Three words from the preamble to the Constitution came to stand in for a particular point of view and a particular set of assumptions present in both of our major national political tendencies.

Molly Ivins, the shallow progressive polemicist, liked to thunder that "We the People don’t have a lobbyist!" She liked to call lobbyists "lobsters," too, a half-joke that she, at least, never tired of. Dr. Ben Carson likes to draft "We the People" into his service. Sean Hannity is very fond of the phrase, and so-called conservative talk radio currently relies heavily on the assumption that the phrase is intended to communicate: that there exists on one side of a line a group of people called "Americans" and on the other side a group called "the Establishment," and that "We the People" are getting screwed by "Them."

I write "so-called" conservative talk radio because the radio mob dropped conservatism with something like military parade-ground precision the moment it looked like the ratings - and hence the juice - were on the other side.

Donald Trump, talked up endlessly by the likes of Hannity and Laura Ingraham, apologized for by Rush Limbaugh, and indulged far too deeply for far too long by far too many others, rejects conservatism. He rejects free trade. He rejects property rights. He rejects the rule of law. He rejects limited government. He advocates a presidency a thousand times more imperial than the one that sprung Athena-like from the brow of Barack Obama and his lawyers. He meditates merrily upon the uses of political violence and riots, and dreams of shutting down newspapers critical of him. He isn't a conservative of any stripe, and it is an outright lie to present him as anything other than what he is.

What he is is the embodiment of the democratic passions that kept John Adams up at night. Trumpkin democracy is the democracy that John Adams warned us about.

A proper republic under the rule of law is, as Adams wrote, "deaf as an adder to the clamors of the populace." It is that which "no passion can disturb" and "void of desire and fear, lust and anger," being, as it is, "mens sine affectu." The Trump movement is light on the mens, being almost entirely affectu. Our law is a law of property, commerce, trade, and individual rights. The democratic passion - which informs the campaign of Bernie Sanders as much as it does that of Donald Trump - rejects those things. It would see unpopular points of view quashed, First Amendment be damned, a project already well under way among Democrats seeking to criminalize dissenting views on global warming.

The democratic passion demands the expropriation of Apple and Goldman Sachs, projects Trump considers with some glee. It demands a central-planning regime in place of the free flow of goods and capital, not because that's good economics - it isn't - but because such a regime would constitute an act of economic and political violence against Them. These ideas are on the rise in many places, notably among adherents of Jean-Marie Le Pen's Front Nationale in France and the Golden Dawn in beleaguered Greece, which latter group, despite reports of its demise, remains very much with us.

In our time as in Adams's time, the worst of human nature is a threat amplified in the United States by the openness of our society and the liberality of our institutions. Adams again:

While our country remains untainted with the principles and manners which are now producing desolation in so many parts of the world; while she continues sincere, and incapable of insidious and impious policy, we shall have the strongest reason to rejoice in the local destination assigned us by Providence.

But should the people of America once become capable of that deep simulation towards one another, and towards foreign nations, which assumes the language of justice and moderation, while it is practising iniquity and extravagance, and displays in the most captivating manner the charming pictures of candour, frankness, and sincerity, while it is rioting in rapine and insolence, this country will be the most miserable habitation in the world. Because we have no government, armed with power, capable of contending with human passions, unbridled by morality and religion.

Avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness would break the strongest cords of our Constitution, as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other. Oaths in this country are as yet universally considered as sacred obligations. That which you have taken, and so solemnly repeated on that venerable ground, is an ample pledge of your sincerity and devotion to your country and its government.

As difficult as it is to imagine Donald Trump taking the presidential oath of office, it is much more difficult to imagine him taking it seriously, or indeed to imagine that there exists anything that is to him a "sacred obligation".

The federal character of the United States, and the fractured nature of the federal government - its three coequal branches and its further subdivided bicameral legislature - are designed to frustrate "We the People" when the people fall into dangerous and violent error of the sort with which they are now flirting. Yes, there are people in power maneuvering to frustrate the will of "We the People" on a dozen different things, ranging from economic and national-defense policy to the specific matter of Donald Trump's presidential campaign. That is prudence and patriotism, and the constitutional architecture of these United States is designed to prevent democratic passion from prevailing. Have your talk-radio temper tantrum. Have your riots. Our form of government, even in its current distorted state, was designed to handle and absorb your passions. You may dream of a dictator, but you will not have one.

- Kevin D. Williamson is roving correspondent for National Review.

[LostPassword]

it is much more difficult to imagine him taking it seriously, or indeed to imagine that there exists anything that is to him a "sacred obligation".

He's made 1000s of agreements and employed 10s of 1000s of workers. If he didn't make fair deals or didn't live up to his obligations the GOPe would be showing us 10 new people each day who he screwed.
In a business atmosphere where businessmen are hated, and often rightly so, I've read almost exclusively positive things about him from
employees (direct, contract, union)
competitors
partners
customers
government officials
citizens in NY and other places he builds

There are lots of reasons to argue that he shouldn't be president. But, at this point, saying he doesn't live up to obligations seems entirely baseless.
Using legal bankruptcy law and having businesses go under is not a failure to meet obligations. Bankruptcy can be mis-used but I haven't heard that case made. I'm sure anyone who hates Trump will make the case - fine, he failed to meet 4 obligations (or 3).

[FrankR]

The liberal media uses history like they do the bible...they only embrace it when they can bend it to make their point.

[miss marmelstein]

Now he’s picking on Laura, lol! And Rush is certainly not in Trump’s pocket.

[cincinnati65]

With all due respect to President Adams, the “avarice, ambition, revenge and licentiousness” of the GOPe ain’t doing much for the country right now!

[miss marmelstein]

What would either of them thought of the leviathan of Washington, DC??? Trump is the natural reaction to the corruption and sclerotic nature of the richest area in the country.

[Mouton]

I will say this much for this group and Red State (Erickson), they are persistent.

[painter]

Populist Demagogue?

That would be Obama in 2008, and he lived up to name!

[faucetman]

Once again all I have to see is “National Review” (National Disgrace) and I know what follows is bull$hit. So I have no need to read their drivel. Besides outhouse toilet paper, it has no purpose.

[goldstategop]

Williamson confuses respect for due process and the law with the unbridled power of the elite to decide policy without answering to the people.

The latter must be rejected as firmly as the unbridled passions of the mob. If a republic is not a democracy than neither is it an aristocracy of the rich and powerful few to whom the political class feels obliged to cater.

[afraidfortherepublic]

That’s proving his point. Are we about to do the same? It’s a horrific choice that we are being offered this year.

[CodeToad]

“Trump or Hillary will produce many of the same results”

That is on the same level of stupidity as any liberal.

[MrEdd]

Pretty much.

[dennisw]

National Review will be around nipping at Trump even after he gets elected. Get used to it. National Review seems to be well funded by various wealthy people and corporations. I never see them begging for money and they have an extensive website with plenty of new material each day. I am sure their writers get decent pay.
Anyone know their financial status?

[Jane Long]

What would either of them thought of the leviathan of Washington, DC??? Trump is the natural reaction to the corruption and sclerotic nature of the richest area in the country.

---

Amen.

[jmaroneps37]

No that was Andrew Jackson. Trump is just trying to save the country.

[Wallace T.]

This is the same writer who said blue collar and rural whites are meth-addled trash who should leave their small town “hellholes” for big cities.

[SunkenCiv]

Oh looky, more meme-building! And when it doesn't work, the agitprop specialists will do a one-eighty and start claiming that the one-term POTUS John Adams was the *precursor* of Donald Trump:

• John Adams: The Early Years -- Alien and Sedition Acts

  Interpreting the prominent participation of immigrants in the Republican opposition party as evidence of a relationship between foreigners and disloyalty, Federalists championed tighter restrictions for foreigners and critics of their policies. The Naturalization Act of 1798 increased the residency requirement for American citizenship from five to fourteen years, required aliens to declare their intent to acquire citizenship five years before it could be granted, and made persons from 'enemy' nations ineligible for naturalization. The act consequently deprived Republicans of an important source of political support. Aliens were specifically affected by two other acts, which authorized their deportation if they were deemed 'dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States' and their wholesale incarceration or expulsion by presidential executive order during wartime. Under the Sedition Act, even the rights of American citizens were curtailed by prohibiting assembly 'with intent to oppose any measure ... of the government' and made it illegal for any person to 'print, utter, or publish … any false, scandalous, and malicious writing' against the government. Armed with these statutes, Federalists attempted to suppress Republican opposition on the basis of ideological differences -- most successfully prosecuting newspaperman Thomas Cooper and Republican congressman Matthew Lyon. These controversies provoked the first probing of the constitutional limits on free speech, the press, and the rights of an organized political opposition. When Thomas Jefferson became president, enforcement of the Alien and Sedition Acts ended. The sedition and incarceration provisions of the acts, however, were resurrected during later wars.

• Adams passes first of Alien and Sedition Acts -- Jun 18, 1798

[WorkingClassFilth]

Your reply is evidence of my convictions.

[ncalburt]

This stupid fool
at this ridiculous cheap labor express newsletter
does not know Fat cat elite Adams is whining about Jackson and the election he stole from Jackson !

Snotty Adams was appointed President by fat cats in Congress and was driven from office by Jackson !

Poor Buckley legacy had been destroyed.

[CodeToad]

Doubling down on stupid, just like a typical liberal.