Posted on 05/20/2013 11:13:16 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows
Being a porn star might not meet the approval of everyone you meet but you might think your bank manager would be one person who wouldn't have cause to complain.
Adult film actress Chanel Preston has starred in close to 150 porn flicks and is well compensated for her time, but now it appears she is having trouble keeping a bank account.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
They just got to let the whole world know every little detail, parade it around. Exhibitionism and stuff....
Well, if taking out a loan/mortgage, they need to show their source(s) of income.
Rooster Farming?
Go to WalMart and get a Blurebird account....they dont care if you are porno star.
Like....what....the checks or direct deposit say “for porn work”
Let’s hope they aren’t even more specific.
Worst.
Boob Job.
Ever.
I believe BOA and Chase are also refusing to do business with firearm related businesses.
Maybe the banks want to avoid trouble from female employees having to interact with people in the porn business, and claiming “hostile working environment”.
Maybe if she showed up at the bank wearing some clothes, she’d find better service. Enough is enough already.
More.
Evidence.
Required.
Heard that one myself.
She wouldn’t have trouble keeping an account if she were a drug dealer.
Banks love drug dealers.
Prostitution is illegal, unless someone’s filming it!
While I would be happy to see bank managers involved in shunning such disgusting behavior, something about this story does not sit right. I have some questions but no answers.
Could it be that some mohammedans are raising a fuss?
Is this just a way to set a precedent so they can go after conservatives based on some sort of claim of moral objection?
Are the claims of the “victims” bogus and just a premise for inviting more Obamugabe regs?
Maybe the tellers don't like handling all those sticky $1 bills.
Seriously, the acting is atrocious, production is amateurish and it's always the same story line, but OTOH the porn industry never asked me for a bailout...
Does this include high profile hotel chains that offer pay-per-porn channels for lonely travellers to jerk off to?
When homosexual acts were legally considered "unnatural" and illegal, same sex porn was not outright illegal or "obscene".
Yet when the age of consent is under 18 (16, 17) or bestiality is legal (and it is/was legal in a number of states) you could engage in the acts, you just couldn't film/photograph them.
None of the distinctions make sense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.