Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Big Bang Never Happened
YouTube ^ | 6/9/09 | Randall Meyers

Posted on 03/07/2011 1:44:47 PM PST by wendy1946

In nine parts on YouTube

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

Part 6

Part 7

Part 8

Part 9


A spectacular exposition featuring heavyweights in astronomy, mathematics, plasma physics, cosmology etc. including Halton Arp, Tony Peratt, Eric Lerner, Fred Hoyle and a number of others, and yet comprehensible to the educated layman. The "big bang" which we've heard about all our lives turns out to be junk physics.


TOPICS: Astronomy; Religion; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; bigbang; bob152; cosmology; johnnywaddholmes; ronjeremy; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 last
To: wendy1946
There are two possibilities: Either heavy metals arrived here via impact events or they were formed here by plasma-physics style events (electrical arc discharges between Earth and other bodies), either way they have not been sitting around here for billions of years.

Niether of those explains why the Uranium ore we find consistently has daughter elements present consistent with billions of years of decay.

121 posted on 03/09/2011 7:56:18 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

From under the Earth’s crust, not from the core.


122 posted on 03/09/2011 8:16:37 AM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
From under the Earth’s crust, not from the core.

Where did "What's under the Earth's crust" come from? Why are there heavy elements present in magma? Shouldn't it be composed of only the very lightest of elements?

123 posted on 03/09/2011 8:31:56 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

Still waiting for an explanation of why all the uranium ore has all the required daughter elements, in just the right proportions to be consistent with billions of years of decay, after only a few million years.


124 posted on 03/09/2011 8:35:35 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946

A very concise summary of the past 30 years or so since I’ve been following this, beginning with my college astronomy classes. It was great to see so many of the astronomers and physicists I’ve read about all together in this presentation. Some day some folks making rude comments on this thread (who, strangely, seem to be the usual suspects known for snide pooh-poohing) will perhaps come back to the core of science, which is making observations and then devising testable explanations for those observations. I think one of the speakers who criticized the American post-doc system as aggravating the problem of entrenched orthodoxy was exactly right.


125 posted on 03/09/2011 11:49:43 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #126 Removed by Moderator

To: wendy1946

Mammoths, Mastodons, Sabre Tooth Tigers, Great Deer and Elk are not dinosaurs, they are mammals which died out about 10,000 years ago due to the retreat of the glaciers after the last ice age. they are the ones you see in petroglyphs and cave walls.

The last of these to die out was a population of small mammoths that died out in about 3500 BC on an island in the Arctic.


127 posted on 03/09/2011 4:12:43 PM PST by texmexis best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

That’s about right. I see a lot of what is called physics today going away within the next ten or fifteen years.


128 posted on 03/09/2011 5:11:16 PM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: texmexis best
No mammoth or mastodon ever had dorsal spikes or a spiked tail (yeah, I know stegosaurs didn't have horns either, the horns were added centuries later by Amerind touchup artists).


129 posted on 03/09/2011 5:18:18 PM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady; wendy1946
It TOL says it's a good ping, then I opt in. (please).

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

130 posted on 03/09/2011 6:25:24 PM PST by Cyber Ninja
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Ninja; wendy1946

Welcome. :-)


131 posted on 03/09/2011 7:04:56 PM PST by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946; allmendream
I have listened to folks who say God is "outside" of time.
That time is a construct of our existence.

What say you?

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

132 posted on 03/09/2011 7:12:36 PM PST by Cyber Ninja
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Ninja
To the extent I've ever been able to discern from a number of study areas, God works entirely within the laws of physics. If you really want miracles and violations of the basic laws of mathematics and probability in wholesale lots, you need to be talking to the evolutionites, they specialize in that sort of thing.

There is a curious analogy you could make to the idea of God wanting or having reasons for obeying the basic laws of physics. Genghis Khan saw at an early age that the peoples he forged into his empire had developed military capabilities beyond anything the rest of the world had but remained poor and divided precisely for lack of any sort of organization which could be defended logically, or a basic set of laws which could create order amongst them. Thus the Yasaq, or great Mongol legal code and system, was his most major work in life. He also saw that such a system could only work, if EVERYBODY including himself and his family and everybody else in leadership echelons obeyed it and agreed to be bound by it every bit as much as the lowliest person in the empire and after creating the Yasaq, he obeyed it at all times himself.

That arrangement held together for about 100 years, three or four generations, which is about as long as the empire itself held together, before starting to unravel. I believe that the situation with God and the laws of physics has to be similar, and that God will never violate those laws.

I generally do not see things I'd view as supernatural in the Bible. I see PARANORMAL things, and things outside the realm of our present experience, but they all work within the confines of physical laws.

133 posted on 03/09/2011 8:12:24 PM PST by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; Las Vegas Dave; ...
Note: this topic is from 3/07/2011. Wendy1946 got the zot late last year, but I'm pretty sure he or she has been back under at least one new nick'.

· String Theory Ping List ·
Sorry we re open
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


134 posted on 07/25/2012 3:55:21 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-134 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson