Posted on 03/24/2009 12:41:30 PM PDT by rxsid
USDOJ: Office of Solicitor General AND SCOTUS!
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. just received a phone call from Karen Thornton at the Department of Justice. She stated that all of Orly's documents and filings have been forwarded to the Office of Solicitor General, Elena Kagan. That includes all three Dossiers, the Quo Warranto Easterling v. Obama aka Soetoro. Please show your support that we want these matters and investigations looked into immediately, 202-514-2203.
Coincidently, after Dr. Taitz called me with that update, she received another call from Officer Giaccino at the Supreme Court. Officer Giaccino stated both pleadings have been received and being analyzed now. Also, Justice Roberts must be back because the Officer also stated that all the documents that were given to Chief Justice Roberts at Iowan University are now at the Supreme Court and are also being analyzed. We will be notified tomorrow after 1:00pm EST as to whether they will be on the docket at the Supreme Court.
http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/24/usdoj--office-of-solicitor-general-and-scotus.aspx
Orly was always the lead attorney for Alan Keyes.
Don’t know but if so, she must recuse herself. At first blush, it would appear that her job would include issues brought against the Office of the President or were of such importance that the Office of the President would want to participate via a briefs to the Supremes. However, in this unique case, she has a financial interest in the outcome (her salary and other emoluments) since if O is not a natural born citizen, then his appointments are illegal and voided ab initio.
Is The POPE CATHOLIC?
Oh yeah, thanks! Is she ‘working alone’ (as far as attorney’s) on the Lightfoot v Bowen case?
The mistake isn't the result of some reporter to whom it's all just flyover country. The mistake is on Orly's own blog posting.
In a similar vein, when she posted about her trip to Idaho, she wrote that she flew into Tacoma, then drove a couple of hours to Idaho. After enough people noted that was impossible, she corrected herself to say she flew into Spokane.
Good point!
Yes. She also is alone on Keyes v. Obama aka Soetoro. And the Military Action.
You can add any major intel organization in the world and that includes our.
Gates was kept on as SEC DOD, and not much has changed with our military.
obOZ0 is very vulnerable to any country, anyone and any organization with the real data on his birth.
>>>The mistake isn’t the result of some reporter to whom it’s all just flyover country.
I did not say it was. I never claimed to be a reporter.
>>>>The mistake is on Orly’s own blog posting.
No it is not. It is my blog posting.
Well, well, well .... thank you so much for posting.
Praying the good Chief Justice remembers that his
absolute loyalty is to and protection of the Constitution,
not to politics or political correctness, and is
guided accordingly. Complete truth and clarity on
this issue once and for all .. that’s all most of us
want.
Yes Mark, you are right. That is why a Quo Warranto was filed. (three times) And it is one of the documents that is being reviewed.
Quo Warranto for review:
http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/16/quo-warranto-sent-to-the-us-att-for-dc-jeffrey-taylor.aspx
Quo warranto sent to the US att for DC Jeffrey Taylor
Fine. It was your mistake. I was responding to #28.
Dito that!
Actually that link did have the actual Quo Warranto. That was a letter about it.
Go to this one:
http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/02/prelitigation-quo-warranto-letter-to-attorney-general-holder.aspx
Pre-Litigation Quo Warranto Letter to Attorney General Holder
Does any one know if Danny Bickel still work at the SC? I thought I remembered something about his name having been removed from the clerk list a few days ago
No, you responded to 45, that is me.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2213668/posts?page=45#45
Tic toc tic toc.... time is starting to run short on Obama and his trolls.
Just how does one obtain the honorific Esquire?
Aaaahh, thanks Cal. I wasn’t sure of the order of her meeting th justices.
So any word on the paperwork to Roberts then? Or is this it?
Hopefully under the watchful eye of the SCOTUS, the DOJ won’t play too many games.
Really? Do you remember where you heard that? Link?
Thanks!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.