Begone!
Posted on 03/01/2005 8:07:26 AM PST by vigilanteonvigilante
As a disclaimer to the following, it is important to note that there is a part of mandate in the following, but also a part of research and hypothesis. It is not a Manifesto but the result of manifestations.
Criticizing the following is fair and fine, of course, however some critics have for agenda to smear the information and informer in order to cover up their own professional disgraces and not have them addressed as an important issue. Most of these "enemies", however, I feel sorry for, for several reasons: 1. because they spend more on hiding than doing their job and discussing things fairly, thus they are dying in free fall. 2. because they buy out protectors for their jobs which end up becoming so wealthy at their expenses, it is sad. 3. Incapable of raising spirits within themselves, they can only look to "all knowing" job "provider"/protector type authority to guide their works, and, thus, they feel lost without such persecuting authority.
That said, I will now go to the gist of this piece. So, where to begin? It is mind boggling the number of grief I have to list in there, that I do not know how to get to the point through contemporary case studies at hand in concise manner.
Let us say this, there are two types of deeds in the world, some are good and some are evil, and these are not a struggle in relative gray morality of one dominant parties vs. oppositions. However, there does exist an extention to this moral relativist thinking, and it is dialectic communism and attempt at world manipulation through control of oppositions. This is the fancy way of saying extortion to protect deeds, good or evil. Lawyers stand close to the practice of such extortive business, but not quite at the center. They too are being manipulated like fools, because their dependencies on secrecy, while suffering key character infirmities which add up to such dependencies, are basicaly so great that they must in the end pay off or will have to pay off their own protectors.
Good deeds are basicaly the work of self preservation, and the defense of such right to self-preserve and do good things. Basicaly this is what a Jewish character state should be all about. Bad deeds are those which tend to defend works of destruction.
However distortions occur in that man has great vanity. Because of this great vanity the protection of good deeds, as under the Church "back then", became a sort of monopoly and right only endowed to the Church. So, yes, your good deeds were protected, but the price to the Lords and the Church for such "do gooding" were so great as to defeat the purpose. Something had to crack. The Protestant movement and Reformation were a first attempt at that. Then followed a second distortion: that of legitimizing evil deeds behind rationalization: materialist terrorist power rationals (I am richer, I thus get to decide, whether I stole that wealth or not, whether I know how to grow it or not), pseudo-human excuses (kill the baby to save the pregnant woman socialy) and what not.
These rationalist materialist discoveries lead to a movement of complete contempt for former "do gooding" protectors, and thus the King was beheaded during the French revolution, and, later, independent political "do gooders", good Jews and protestants, that is, became subjected to various forms of discrimination and even extermination programs, with dialectic retaliations occuring from there too against a "secularized" world (secular but nonetheless highly mysticist in many areas of cursing like psychoanalysis diagnostics "discoveries"). This battle of good vs. evil continues today.
In my choices above, I chose good (or the bad, or the gray, depending on where you wish to look at things and what you want to condemn of hypocrisy). I am proud to say that I come out today, in public, and I say I am against homosexuality, abortion etc... However I cannot pretend to protect those things the way I thought Kings or Protestant JudeoChristian scholars and politicians protected them. That said, I continue to be for my personal right of protection of "do gooding". That is my perfect right of social, personal and societal self-preservation, cover and advocacy. Sure, it is advocacy in the flesh to avoid abortion in order to find advocates within one's family, as opposed to aborted families which find advocates in aliens. It is imperfect, nationalism, that is, but where else comes the choice in question?
There is a trend nowadays which finds self-preservation not in one's children but in one's job and social acceptance and general wealth, political and financial. However, in the end, protecting one's job does not mean making enemies, and especialy not at home. Again, those sacrificing sacred things for their job or the color of their uniforms or offices have an interest in nationalism despite all ideas to the contrary. What they need to do is find a way to get their own children to contribute, as their job, to this foundation, intead of treating them like strangers or leaving them foreign to pour their hearts into drugs.
Ah! So, you think, I am one of those crazy right wingers.
Well, let us look at the alternative. We have currently gazillion women who have commited horrid forms of adulterous acts in the form of abortions (with the supporting feminized men in cahoots). These women in my opinion should be forgiven, not out of feeling insulting pity for their "choices", but simply out of necessity. These women are currently investing huge amounts of emotional and financial spiritual investments into protecting their consciousness to self-tyranical levels. Yes, they hire their own tyrants to protect, nay, vindicate their unconsciounable conscious acts.
What was advertised as a boon to women's enrichment and social acceptability has lead to their pauperization because they have to pay gazillions of dollars evil lawyers and politicians who promise to look the other way, make other look the other way, and, in exchange those same politicians can get their corrupt deals and bribe taking to be looked the other way too: a Clintonoid Monica/PaulaJohnes syndrome contradicting the very elicitors of those laws which convicted Clinton. Meanwhile these women have no children, end up depressed and mistreated, alone, in nursing homes, while the politicians can enjoy adopting "the children of the world". As Hillary put it: "it's for the Children." and indeed, hers, that is!
So, instead of women finding the funds and fund raisers in men to pay for their "houses", they only enrich the families of politicians, help them buy their own mantions, and only end up being on this welfare dole. Ah! What a deal! Many men out there wish they could be that smart, getting both the alimony and the woman and the children, while being bureaucraticaly divorced from them, foreignizing them, keeping them miserable, throwing them a rare accademic bone now and then, depending on the economic capabilities of the day.
Look, you may not like what I say, but what are my choices today and what would you wish me to become?
A. A militant for good deeds combined with the call for a small legal revolution forgiving aborting feminists (men and women), having them respect my 2nd amendment rights of self preservation and family making, with the enactment of an end to the federal funding of things like Planned Parenthood and what not, all of which have thus become moot in terms of protecting women's integrity in society, even if they do the relatively bad, since these women have been forgiven in the first place and do not need to pay any one or have anything funded for their protection.
B. A politician with a liberaly colored uniform, getting gazillion dollars in support to look the other way of your deficiencies, professional incompetences and moral bankruptcy, while sustaining at my own home very conservative pro-religious discipline, for my personal sake. As I told a worker brother of mine: Hi, my name is Bill Clinton II, I run as a Democrat, but I vote conservative.
You know, B is very tempting, especialy amongst a people I suspect is highly stubborn and into cover ups and craving for social recognition instead of good personal moral standing and open repentance risk. This is not to say I am particularly moral, however as a thinker I can step outside myself and this world, look at it, analyze it, and see where it is headed, along with myself.
I think it is time that liberals and the US government started revolting, not against conservatives, but against those politicians enriching themselves at their expenses. We conservatives will be all to happy to support both our government and liberals in this American Renaissance of forgiveness and respect of self-preservation. There is no other alternative, for we cannot keep paying others to defend ourselves, lest we want to become slaves (and not merely poor, for being poor in apparent wealth is not the same as total poperization into slavery mentality, no matter the material wealth) and them our tyrants.
This is not just a challenge to America, but to the rest of the socialist fraudulent world too. One can only hope, because the "Peace processes" we are seeing are only for fools. False prophets are rising left and right, in total cynicism, believing that YOU the "stupid American" deserve to pay all you can to have your right to kill a baby or yourself. This is a fast track to total chaos, a downward spiral to a competition to who can do worse or most outrageous deed yet. The government has some interest in people geared against themselves, as a family, and not people geared at prowling about foreign institutions such as banks and what not. However this is not good for the government because good government depends on good economy and good foundations. It certainly should not be there paying to cover for the deeds and feminist mafias out there which are out there to undermine it, in addition to creating competing law enforcement agencies tending to the pauperization of government itself.
Well, the cat is out of the bag. It is now your choices. See, I support it when gays buy firearms to defend themselves... the worst thing is when they would have to rely on these other scumbags for their protections, scumbags who have no respect whatsoever for liberal lifestyles. I myself simply cannot hate those I must love, whatever they do to me and what I cherish in peace and good family foundation.
Begone!
Good Lord, LEAVE ALREADY!
Do I hear the strains of the "Immigrant Song" by Led Zeppelin??
In before its gone.
Listen do you smell something?
*chuckle*
I'm not sure there is much that makes sense on this thread.
Do not read the lyrics posted in post 66.
If you've heard the song, it will come flooding back into memory, take up residence, and refuse to leave.
;-)
Dunno.
I'm picking up parts of the detector.
Note to self: If on third paragraph of opus, and still trying to figure out where to begin, start over.
LOL! I must say you always have the best selection of kitty pictures. I love that you post different ones. In fact I always look forward to seeing what you come up with next! :)
Chevelle - Closure
Breathe, trust, bless me and release,
Climb, hard or never be seen.
Closed off, rescue to breathe.
Just bless me.
Two sided time,
Your rebirth can't hurt,
Branch out behind, the pain.
Closure has come to me myself,
You will never belong to me.
Closure has come to me myself,
You will never belong to me.
Had to to turn, lay down,
Your sting of disease.
Phase you out, should've seen this coming.
Go on confusing the soul,
Hold my breath 'til you rupture.
Three days aside,
Your rebirth can't hurt,
Branch out behind, pride.
Closure has come to me myself,
You will never belong to me.
Closure has come to me myself,
You will never belong to me.
Like a leach,
I hold on as if we belonged,
To some precious pure dream.
Cast off, you've seen what's beneath,
Now fail me.
Forget closure,
Forget closure,
Forget closure,
Forget closure.
Closure has come to me myself,
You will never belong to me.
Closure has come to me myself,
You will never belong to me.
So breathe.
Into Another - T.A.I.L.
It is a pity that she never sees
So many faces he hides from her
And he is as amphibious as they come
And as they come he iis promising her everything
Everything
Oh, if she only knew everything
And he thinks he is so pretty, but he never sees
His own reflection staring right back at him
The water's always rippling
Shimmering
And I won't see things his way
No, Idon't know him
I don't owe him anything
She loves him
He's not there
Amphibious
Everywhere
Everywhere
She wants to leave
And she wants to believe the countless lies he tells her
And she tells a few herself
But, let me say in her defense
She lies in self defense
It is a pity that she's never been to many places
He hides from her
He says he loves her
Yeah
He tells us all that
[yeah]
When she wakes uo
She'll leave
Leave
She's gonna leave him
Leave him
She loves him
He's not there
He is
Amphibious
Everywhere
Everywhere
Everywhere
It's not the mere fact that she's reptilian
Though you'd think that it would be
Wouldn't you?
It's in teh way he takes
The way she gives so willingly
As they've done all their lives
She loves him
He's not there
He is
Amphibious
Everywhere
You know she'll wait there
Or anywhere
And everywhere
Anywhere
Everywhere
Everywhere
Everywhere
H.I.M. - And Love Said No
Love's light blue led me to you
Through the emptiness that had become my home
Love's lies cruel introduced me to you
And that moment I knew I was out of hope
Kill me, I begged and love said "no"
Leave me for dead and let me go
Kill me, I cried and love said "no"
Kill me, I cried and love said "no"
Love's icy tomb dug open for you
Lies in cemetery that bears my name
Love's violent tune from me to you
Rips your heart out and leaves you bleeding
With a smile on your face
Kill me, I begged and love said "no"
Leave me for dead and let me go
Kill me, I cried and love said "no"
Kill me, I cried and love said "no"
Love's light blue took me from you
And that moment I knew I was out of hope...again
Kill me, I begged and love said "no"
Leave me for dead and let me go
Kill me, I cried and love said "no"
Kill me, I cried and love said "no"
Love said "no"
And love said "no"
"But the cat came back the very next day,
The cat came back, we thought he was a goner
But the cat came back; it just couldn't stay away..."
LOL!
Something like that!
I'm still trying to get the Macarena out of my head.
That, and Right Said Fred's "I'm too sexy"
*ugh*
I'd rather have E'nuff Z'nuff's "Fly High Michelle" stuck in my head.
LOL!
Wombats abound on these threads for some reason.
Must be a connection.
In the works of Fellini, a predominant concept is the distinction between ground and figure. In a sense, Bataille uses the term 'textual objectivism' to denote the rubicon, and subsequent meaninglessness, of postcapitalist culture.
The subject is interpolated into a structuralist desemanticism that includes consciousness as a paradox. But Lyotard's critique of subcultural theory states that academe is intrinsically meaningless.
Marx promotes the use of structuralist desemanticism to deconstruct hierarchy. Therefore, the premise of structural neocultural theory holds that class has objective value.
"Sexual identity is dead," says Baudrillard. If textual objectivism holds, we have to choose between materialist feminism and subcultural appropriation. In a sense, Bataille suggests the use of structuralist desemanticism to modify and read society.
Reicher[1] implies that we have to choose between materialist feminism and precultural desublimation. But Derrida uses the term 'structuralist desemanticism' to denote the role of the observer as artist.
Bataille promotes the use of textual objectivism to attack class divisions. However, the subject is contextualised into a materialist feminism that includes reality as a totality. Debord uses the term 'Sontagist camp' to denote not constructivism as such, but subconstructivism. In a sense, Sartre suggests the use of textual objectivism to challenge sexuality.
In the works of Fellini, a predominant concept is the concept of subtextual reality. The primary theme of the works of Fellini is the role of the writer as participant. However, if the structural paradigm of expression holds, we have to choose between Lyotardist narrative and dialectic posttextual theory.
The subject is interpolated into a materialist feminism that includes sexuality as a whole. But several narratives concerning textual objectivism may be revealed.
Debord promotes the use of materialist feminism to attack the status quo. In a sense, Bailey[2] suggests that we have to choose between textual objectivism and the conceptual paradigm of reality.
The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).
This installation of the Generator has delivered 1478662 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational. It is being served from a machine in Seattle, Washington, USA.
More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: "On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks". An on-line copy is available from Monash University.
More generated texts are linked to from the Communications From Elsewhere front page.
If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal's brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.