"Is he dead yet, Jim?"
Posted on 03/01/2005 8:07:26 AM PST by vigilanteonvigilante
As a disclaimer to the following, it is important to note that there is a part of mandate in the following, but also a part of research and hypothesis. It is not a Manifesto but the result of manifestations.
Criticizing the following is fair and fine, of course, however some critics have for agenda to smear the information and informer in order to cover up their own professional disgraces and not have them addressed as an important issue. Most of these "enemies", however, I feel sorry for, for several reasons: 1. because they spend more on hiding than doing their job and discussing things fairly, thus they are dying in free fall. 2. because they buy out protectors for their jobs which end up becoming so wealthy at their expenses, it is sad. 3. Incapable of raising spirits within themselves, they can only look to "all knowing" job "provider"/protector type authority to guide their works, and, thus, they feel lost without such persecuting authority.
That said, I will now go to the gist of this piece. So, where to begin? It is mind boggling the number of grief I have to list in there, that I do not know how to get to the point through contemporary case studies at hand in concise manner.
Let us say this, there are two types of deeds in the world, some are good and some are evil, and these are not a struggle in relative gray morality of one dominant parties vs. oppositions. However, there does exist an extention to this moral relativist thinking, and it is dialectic communism and attempt at world manipulation through control of oppositions. This is the fancy way of saying extortion to protect deeds, good or evil. Lawyers stand close to the practice of such extortive business, but not quite at the center. They too are being manipulated like fools, because their dependencies on secrecy, while suffering key character infirmities which add up to such dependencies, are basicaly so great that they must in the end pay off or will have to pay off their own protectors.
Good deeds are basicaly the work of self preservation, and the defense of such right to self-preserve and do good things. Basicaly this is what a Jewish character state should be all about. Bad deeds are those which tend to defend works of destruction.
However distortions occur in that man has great vanity. Because of this great vanity the protection of good deeds, as under the Church "back then", became a sort of monopoly and right only endowed to the Church. So, yes, your good deeds were protected, but the price to the Lords and the Church for such "do gooding" were so great as to defeat the purpose. Something had to crack. The Protestant movement and Reformation were a first attempt at that. Then followed a second distortion: that of legitimizing evil deeds behind rationalization: materialist terrorist power rationals (I am richer, I thus get to decide, whether I stole that wealth or not, whether I know how to grow it or not), pseudo-human excuses (kill the baby to save the pregnant woman socialy) and what not.
These rationalist materialist discoveries lead to a movement of complete contempt for former "do gooding" protectors, and thus the King was beheaded during the French revolution, and, later, independent political "do gooders", good Jews and protestants, that is, became subjected to various forms of discrimination and even extermination programs, with dialectic retaliations occuring from there too against a "secularized" world (secular but nonetheless highly mysticist in many areas of cursing like psychoanalysis diagnostics "discoveries"). This battle of good vs. evil continues today.
In my choices above, I chose good (or the bad, or the gray, depending on where you wish to look at things and what you want to condemn of hypocrisy). I am proud to say that I come out today, in public, and I say I am against homosexuality, abortion etc... However I cannot pretend to protect those things the way I thought Kings or Protestant JudeoChristian scholars and politicians protected them. That said, I continue to be for my personal right of protection of "do gooding". That is my perfect right of social, personal and societal self-preservation, cover and advocacy. Sure, it is advocacy in the flesh to avoid abortion in order to find advocates within one's family, as opposed to aborted families which find advocates in aliens. It is imperfect, nationalism, that is, but where else comes the choice in question?
There is a trend nowadays which finds self-preservation not in one's children but in one's job and social acceptance and general wealth, political and financial. However, in the end, protecting one's job does not mean making enemies, and especialy not at home. Again, those sacrificing sacred things for their job or the color of their uniforms or offices have an interest in nationalism despite all ideas to the contrary. What they need to do is find a way to get their own children to contribute, as their job, to this foundation, intead of treating them like strangers or leaving them foreign to pour their hearts into drugs.
Ah! So, you think, I am one of those crazy right wingers.
Well, let us look at the alternative. We have currently gazillion women who have commited horrid forms of adulterous acts in the form of abortions (with the supporting feminized men in cahoots). These women in my opinion should be forgiven, not out of feeling insulting pity for their "choices", but simply out of necessity. These women are currently investing huge amounts of emotional and financial spiritual investments into protecting their consciousness to self-tyranical levels. Yes, they hire their own tyrants to protect, nay, vindicate their unconsciounable conscious acts.
What was advertised as a boon to women's enrichment and social acceptability has lead to their pauperization because they have to pay gazillions of dollars evil lawyers and politicians who promise to look the other way, make other look the other way, and, in exchange those same politicians can get their corrupt deals and bribe taking to be looked the other way too: a Clintonoid Monica/PaulaJohnes syndrome contradicting the very elicitors of those laws which convicted Clinton. Meanwhile these women have no children, end up depressed and mistreated, alone, in nursing homes, while the politicians can enjoy adopting "the children of the world". As Hillary put it: "it's for the Children." and indeed, hers, that is!
So, instead of women finding the funds and fund raisers in men to pay for their "houses", they only enrich the families of politicians, help them buy their own mantions, and only end up being on this welfare dole. Ah! What a deal! Many men out there wish they could be that smart, getting both the alimony and the woman and the children, while being bureaucraticaly divorced from them, foreignizing them, keeping them miserable, throwing them a rare accademic bone now and then, depending on the economic capabilities of the day.
Look, you may not like what I say, but what are my choices today and what would you wish me to become?
A. A militant for good deeds combined with the call for a small legal revolution forgiving aborting feminists (men and women), having them respect my 2nd amendment rights of self preservation and family making, with the enactment of an end to the federal funding of things like Planned Parenthood and what not, all of which have thus become moot in terms of protecting women's integrity in society, even if they do the relatively bad, since these women have been forgiven in the first place and do not need to pay any one or have anything funded for their protection.
B. A politician with a liberaly colored uniform, getting gazillion dollars in support to look the other way of your deficiencies, professional incompetences and moral bankruptcy, while sustaining at my own home very conservative pro-religious discipline, for my personal sake. As I told a worker brother of mine: Hi, my name is Bill Clinton II, I run as a Democrat, but I vote conservative.
You know, B is very tempting, especialy amongst a people I suspect is highly stubborn and into cover ups and craving for social recognition instead of good personal moral standing and open repentance risk. This is not to say I am particularly moral, however as a thinker I can step outside myself and this world, look at it, analyze it, and see where it is headed, along with myself.
I think it is time that liberals and the US government started revolting, not against conservatives, but against those politicians enriching themselves at their expenses. We conservatives will be all to happy to support both our government and liberals in this American Renaissance of forgiveness and respect of self-preservation. There is no other alternative, for we cannot keep paying others to defend ourselves, lest we want to become slaves (and not merely poor, for being poor in apparent wealth is not the same as total poperization into slavery mentality, no matter the material wealth) and them our tyrants.
This is not just a challenge to America, but to the rest of the socialist fraudulent world too. One can only hope, because the "Peace processes" we are seeing are only for fools. False prophets are rising left and right, in total cynicism, believing that YOU the "stupid American" deserve to pay all you can to have your right to kill a baby or yourself. This is a fast track to total chaos, a downward spiral to a competition to who can do worse or most outrageous deed yet. The government has some interest in people geared against themselves, as a family, and not people geared at prowling about foreign institutions such as banks and what not. However this is not good for the government because good government depends on good economy and good foundations. It certainly should not be there paying to cover for the deeds and feminist mafias out there which are out there to undermine it, in addition to creating competing law enforcement agencies tending to the pauperization of government itself.
Well, the cat is out of the bag. It is now your choices. See, I support it when gays buy firearms to defend themselves... the worst thing is when they would have to rely on these other scumbags for their protections, scumbags who have no respect whatsoever for liberal lifestyles. I myself simply cannot hate those I must love, whatever they do to me and what I cherish in peace and good family foundation.
Sniff......
buh bye
Posting an OPUS on your signup day is bad strategic planning.
< placeholder >
A larger pile of meandering piffle has not been seen around here for many a week.
Alrighty, I've read your screed. I have a headache but I must ask: Is English your first language? If so, do you smoke pot?
UUNNNNGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH
How can this be a 'vanities of vanities' if this is the only thing you've ever posted here???? You get a zero on the opi scale.....
In before the zot
O.K. I tried to read it. Fell asleep. Woke up to the smell of ozone and the sound of Viking music.
interesting responses.
naw he's posting in another thread already
You've been here before.
With a similar screen name I bet
When is your next appointment to see der shrink?
"Is he dead yet, Jim?"
Since you've brought up the subject, have you ever been diagnosed with a serious mental illness?
More like kittens are off their leashes. Buh-bye.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.