Posted on 04/08/2025 9:55:24 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 @julie_kelly2
NEW: Jeb Boasberg cancelled today's scheduled hearing on preliminary injunction for the illegal Venezuelans covered by Alien Enemies Act but stunningly (or not) asks ACLU to file another motion next week explaining why DC is proper place to continue the lawsuit even after SCOTUS clearly said it is not.
As I said--this ain't over.
8:59 AM · Apr 8, 2025
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
COLLUSION!.......................
I guess the ACLU outranks the US Supreme Court. Just file the paperwork and watch the Supreme Court go down in defeat. Or not.
Well there you go SCOTUS, see what you created, your petty (there are no Obama judges) judge has decided to put you on trial and seek to overrule your decision on jurisdictions. Enjoy the SUCK!
SCOTUS could have stopped all this vexatious litigation but they didn’t. Instead they threw out a speed bump.
WHAT PART OF “CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT” DOES HE NOT UNDERSTAND?......................
He doesn’t care and is showing he has bigger liberal balls than the whole SCOTUS except maybe ACB.
Is this Judge stupid?? The Supreme Court has spoken.
A judge asks someone to file a lawsuit ???
Whats wrong with this picture ???
How can this be unbiased ???
Yeah a judge soliciting cases is pretty bad. Not that this will move the head of the court branch of government into intervening.
One thing is true about leftwing activists — they attack relentlessly and never quit.
BoASSberg will continue to connive jurisdiction to disrupt the Trump Administration until he is hit with a writ of prohibition. Bondi should file for one already.
Will no one rid me of this troublesome judge?
At some point, I could even see Compromised Roberts getting pissed at being second-guessed.
Nonsense and everyone needs to calm down. He’s getting ready to shut down. This is my post from the other thread, responding to the notion that Boasberg has been paid off by Soros:
I suppose, maybe. But I just don’t buy the facile theory that these people act because they’ve been paid off. When I hear hoofbeats I think horses, not zebras. We see all across our politics fanatical leftists acting out their beliefs. My read is that’s what animates this judge
That said, typical GP hype and bs here. True the judge was b***h slapped by SCOTUS, but I think this is a perfectly appropriate final step before closing up shop in this case. Judges never like being reversed, particularly with a slap, like a ruling that he lacked jurisdiction to do any of his antics. Likewise the boys and girls on the DC Circuit that upheld him. This slap was pretty hard, and the implication of the article that he’s looking for a way to act that would result in a second, harder, slap, is just ridiculous
Explain please.
This is what a real insurrection looks like.
“...but stunningly (or not) asks ACLU to file another motion next week explaining why DC is proper place to continue the lawsuit even after SCOTUS clearly said it is not.”
Is this act alone enough to warrant a second rebuke from the US Supremes? Did they feel their rebuke of Boasberg was clear enough for him to understand but now will have to re-issue the same order with extra clarifications? Or are judge Boasberg’s actions in prolonging this perfectly fine?
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.