[Macho MAGA Man]

Motion to read attached in link.

[Red Badger]

COLLUSION!.......................

[ClearCase_guy]

I guess the ACLU outranks the US Supreme Court. Just file the paperwork and watch the Supreme Court go down in defeat. Or not.

[Skwor]

Well there you go SCOTUS, see what you created, your petty (there are no Obama judges) judge has decided to put you on trial and seek to overrule your decision on jurisdictions. Enjoy the SUCK!

[ViLaLuz]

SCOTUS could have stopped all this vexatious litigation but they didn’t. Instead they threw out a speed bump.

[Red Badger]

WHAT PART OF “CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT” DOES HE NOT UNDERSTAND?......................

[Sacajaweau]

Is this Judge stupid?? The Supreme Court has spoken.

[Tennessee Nana]

A judge asks someone to file a lawsuit ???

Whats wrong with this picture ???

How can this be unbiased ???

[rottweiller_inc]

Yeah a judge soliciting cases is pretty bad. Not that this will move the head of the court branch of government into intervening.

[Dan in Wichita]

One thing is true about leftwing activists — they attack relentlessly and never quit.

[philman_36]

I wonder if this has to do with keeping his daughter's grift campaign going.
/ wondering

[Dr. Franklin]

BoASSberg will continue to connive jurisdiction to disrupt the Trump Administration until he is hit with a writ of prohibition. Bondi should file for one already.

[Lazamataz]

Will no one rid me of this troublesome judge?

[bray]

This is what a real insurrection looks like.

[desertsolitaire]

“...but stunningly (or not) asks ACLU to file another motion next week explaining why DC is proper place to continue the lawsuit even after SCOTUS clearly said it is not.”

Is this act alone enough to warrant a second rebuke from the US Supremes? Did they feel their rebuke of Boasberg was clear enough for him to understand but now will have to re-issue the same order with extra clarifications? Or are judge Boasberg’s actions in prolonging this perfectly fine?

[sauropod]

.

[joshua c]

DOJ’s response would be a copy of the SC ruling

[rellic]

Until we get the Democrat party out of our Judicary, we face years of this political BS! We’ve already lived with years of it at the state level, only now we are starting to see its horrible effects at the Federal level, which has been happening for years. Can you spell EPA? We have seen the damage their Democrat party influence un checked have caused to our industrial base. An impartial judiciary would have shut them down after they basically performed and completed the job Nixon organized them to do.

[alternatives?]

Can you imagine the ACLU declining?

[Cobra64]

Audit this creep.

[butlerweave]

I said Boasberg would look for someone to sue the Trump Admin , he should be removed