Posted on 04/30/2021 11:06:19 AM PDT by White Lives Matter
The Supreme Court sided with illegal alien fighting deportation, in a 6:3 decision.
The illegal alien, Austo Niz-Chavez, who arrived in the US in 2005 said “his rights” were violated when he received two notices from the government instead of one notice.
Six justices sided with the illegal migrant as Clarence Thomas, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Amy Coney Barrett joined Gorsuch in the majority decision.
Justice Kavanaugh said the majority decision was ridiculous.
The Supreme Court continues to disappoint.
Newsmax reported:
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Can’t blame the justices for government incompetence and poorly written laws. I do think that they are overthinking the placement and literalness of the word “a”.
Alito, Roberts, and Kavanaugh, weird mix.
Apparently, the law states a notice, which implies one notice, and he was sent multiple notices.
I actually agree with the court on this.
I think the guy should be deported, so I disagree with the result. But I agree with the ruling.
Imagine that the idiot libs are in charge and using “lawfare” against us. I can picture them issuing a giant wad of “notices”, each incomplete and each needing the others to paint the full picture, and then expecting a normal non-lawyer American to figure out what the giant wad of notices adds up to. Kind of like filling out tax forms.
JMO
If YOU are ever taken into custody and charged with being an illegal alien, do you want the officer to simply deliver you to the Mexican side of the border or do you want to have a mechanism for proving that you are not guilty?
If you find yourself on the Mexican side of the border, do you want the officers at the border to be obligated to consider your claim of citizenship or not?
p.s. What I don’t agree with is that illegals have any rights. So I don’t think he necessarily had the right to be issued a notice. I think the people of the USA have the right to haul his butt into court at any time or deport him at any time.
I believe that we as decent human beings have an obligation to treat illegals humanely - i.e., not torture them, murder them, etc. But I believe that by coming here illegally, a person forfeits most rights. They certainly should not enjoy the rights of an American citizen.
Gorsuch, huh.
Haven’t read the opinion but what’s wrong with getting an extra notice?
Supreme court sides with lawbreakers. Understandable.
If there was ever any doubt about the corruption of the USSC, this “decision” should now put that to rest.
I agree!
Nothing if the notices all contain the same complete information. It’s a whole nother matter if the information keeps changing or conflicts.
The Supreme Court exists just in case voters do something that the oligarchs disagree with.
This is what is wrong with contextualism: it allows justices to pretend they are in the dark as to the meaning of the law, or the constitution, and therefore people that they like and want to help are in the dark too.
“Give them Barabbas.”
In other areas of government, such as patent law, “a” does not limit to a single item. Receiving multiple notices would be covered by the wording of “a notice”. Go figure.
Precedence was set in Bush V Gore when Florida tried to change their election recount rules without going through their State Legislature. I don't get the difference. Many of the swing States also changed their rules mid-stream.
In any lawsuit that should reach the USSC, a General Election case should take priority, not some lame one versus two notifications for an illegal.
Amy coney Barret may turn out to be the type of lawyer who learns, remembers and repeats, but does not think.
There are a lot like that and they usually get good grades.
We may find out she is Amy Coney Parrot.
That’s incorrect. The law says the Government had to supply all the information in one package and they did not do that. Instead they mailed him everything piecemeal in several different packages over the span of a couple of years I think it was, which is in violation of the law. The Government has an obligation to obey the law and when they don’t the Courts are supposed to smack them down like in this case. One other point, the court did not “side” the illegal immigrant, the Court sided with the law and the Constitution, and thank goodness for that. The USSC operated exactly as it should in this case. Also before making idiotic statements like the court sided with the illegal immigrant, one should read the Gorsuch (SP?) opinion in this case, it lays out their reasoning very well.
It wasn’t an extra notice. The law states that the government must provide all the information needed in one package and the government did not do that. Read the opinion and you’ll be diabused of the ignorant claim that the USSC sided with an illegal alien, the courts simply ruled on the law, as they should.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.