[A Navy Vet]

If both notices were exactly the same, then the majority ruled on a technicality. Yet they wouldn't look at the merits of the numerous lawsuits claiming fraud and illegal changes in States rules in the election. That they didn't even look at the merits of the Texas suit with 19 States joining, still astounds me and confuses me.

Precedence was set in Bush V Gore when Florida tried to change their election recount rules without going through their State Legislature. I don't get the difference. Many of the swing States also changed their rules mid-stream.

In any lawsuit that should reach the USSC, a General Election case should take priority, not some lame one versus two notifications for an illegal.

[proud American in Canada]

I think many, many people have become very disillusioned in the past year.

The election was a disaster and everyone in a position to do anything about it
...just chose not to.

[proud American in Canada]

I think many, many people have become very disillusioned in the past year.

The election was a disaster and everyone in a position to do anything about it
...just chose not to.

[lepton]

If both notices were exactly the same, then the majority ruled on a technicality.

---

They weren’t. They were piecemeal, with even the common information type different from one to the other.