Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dr. Ronald Polland: Obama's Two Minute Warning; Factcheck.org Forged Obama's Birth Certificate
obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ^ | 02/22/2010 | ObamaRelease YourRecords

Posted on 02/22/2011 10:46:07 AM PST by rxsid

"Dr. Ronald Polland: Obama's Two Minute Warning; Factcheck.org Forged Obama's Birth Certificate

Game over, Barack Obama. This 2-minute video will destroy your birth certificate fraud.

You were not born here. You are not a US citizen. Your FORGED BIRTH CERTIFICATE, fabricated by Annenberg Factcheck, proves you are a liar, a fraud, an imposter, and an illegal alien.

The FIRST EIGHT SECONDS of this video buries your rabid liberal media in their own lies.

They demanded that conservatives accept what the Hawaii Governor said about you and your birth certificate.

We do - now you and your gullible supporters must do likewise.

The former Governor said that requesting a Presidential candidate to show his or her birth certificate to prove eligibility is a legitimate question for Congress.

Mr. Obama - or whatever your is real name - you had seven years to prove who you are, and you refused to do so.

Obama must go, NOW. - Dr. Ronald Polland - Source.

YouTube Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTgAuVFo7iU&feature=player_embedded"

From: http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/02/dr-ronald-polland-obamas-two-minute.html

 

Flashback from the Right Side of Life; - Meet the only 2 people to ever "examine" Obama's SHORT-FORM COLB's. -

The two FactCheck.org employees who were granted access to Obama’s bogus Certification of Live Birth (COLB) are NOT document examiners or experts. Joe Miller has a Ph. D. in Political Philosophy — so he’s a political operative — while Jess Henig has an M.A. in English Literature — I’m not sure her dye-job is a political or esthetic statement.They are a couple of partisan Obots — just what you’d expect — Jess took the photos presented on their webpage and did all of the writing, while Bob basically held the COLB open for Jess to photograph — suitable work for a Ph. D.

Those two are completely unqualified to perform any kind of forensic examination of any document, and FactCheck.org knows it — and so do Henig and Miller.

FactCheck does say their, “representatives got a chance to spend some time with the ‘birth certificate,’ and we can attest to the fact that it is real and three-dimensional and resides at the Obama headquarters in Chicago.” In my mind, that clearly shows they were working with and for the Obama Campaign and that Obama and his people are involved in this lie. Much more here.

And this; - Blogger manipulates birth certificate image, undermining Obama claims - Jay McKinnon, a self-described Department of Homeland Security-trained document specialist, has implicated himself in the production of palpably fake Hawaii birth certificate images similar to the one endorsed as genuine by the Barack Obama campaign, and appearing on the same Daily Kos blog entry where the supposedly authentic document appears. Much more here and here.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Reference
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; eligibility; naturalborncitizen; obama; polland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321-325 next last
To: jamese777
The former Governor, Linda Lingle got it right:

Well,not so much. Prepared to be schooled again. Observe:

"You know, during the campaign of 2008, I was actually in the mainland campaigning for Sen. McCain. This issue kept coming up so much in the campaign, and again I think it’s one of those issues that is simply a distraction from the more critical issues that are facing the country. And so I had my health director, who is a physician by background, go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records of the Department of Health, and we issued a news release at that time saying that the president was, in fact, born at Kapi’olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii."

Yes, Chiyome Fukino released a news release claiming Obama was born in Hawaii. The date of that release was July 2009 (incidentally the same date Gov. Abercrombie's 50th anniversary of Hawaii resolution was released). Lingle says this statement (which does NOT say mention ANY hospital) came out during the campaign. Question: Was Lingle campaigning for Juan McCain in July 2009??

161 posted on 02/22/2011 8:27:26 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: edge919

The former Governor, Linda Lingle got it right:
Well,not so much. Prepared to be schooled again. Observe:

“You know, during the campaign of 2008, I was actually in the mainland campaigning for Sen. McCain. This issue kept coming up so much in the campaign, and again I think it’s one of those issues that is simply a distraction from the more critical issues that are facing the country. And so I had my health director, who is a physician by background, go personally view the birth certificate in the birth records of the Department of Health, and we issued a news release at that time saying that the president was, in fact, born at Kapi’olani Hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii.”
Yes, Chiyome Fukino released a news release claiming Obama was born in Hawaii. The date of that release was July 2009 (incidentally the same date Gov. Abercrombie’s 50th anniversary of Hawaii resolution was released). Lingle says this statement (which does NOT say mention ANY hospital) came out during the campaign. Question: Was Lingle campaigning for Juan McCain in July 2009??


The first Fukino media release was dated October 31, 2008.
http://hawaii.gov/health/about/pr/2008/08-93.pdf
That was when Lingle sent Fukino and Onaka to look at the birth certificate.

The second media release of July 27, 2009 was to clarify what was actually on the certificate.


162 posted on 02/22/2011 8:43:30 PM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: circumbendibus
I don't trust Polarik as far as I could throw Michelle Obama.

Polarik is Ron Pollard's FR handle. No I don't ping him. Polarik tried to throw me under the bus, and got handed his hat. Hardcore. He attempted to prove my real Hawaiian COLB a fraud. FAIL. HARDCORE FAIL. He could not tell a real one from a fake one.

Therefore I don't trust a damn thing the guy does, whether its legit or not, the source taints the results before they are even presented.

Furthermore, you CANNOT tell from a picture of a document, if the document pictured is real. All you can speak to is the image, not the document. Polarik is whacked as far as I am concerned because he is trying to make an invalid claim about a real document, based upon images of it. That's BS. The ONLY thing you can discuss is the image, not the document. Polarik is irrelevant.

163 posted on 02/22/2011 8:45:58 PM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer
This has been shown to occur on one and only one "Certification of Birth" that you believe is from the State of Hawaii. How is that a common occurrence?

All I'm saying is that his argument that laser printers are unable to produce this "shadow" effect is false. And since that's all he's going on, the video is worthless and says nothing.

164 posted on 02/22/2011 9:21:06 PM PST by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
The first Fukino media release was dated October 31, 2008.

Yes, we know. The first Fukino news release was dated Oct. 31, just a few days PRIOR to the election and AFTER Lingle finished campaigning for Juan McCain. This news release does NOT contain any claim of where Obama born. None. Why did Lingle lie??

The second media release of July 27, 2009 was to clarify what was actually on the certificate.

The second release doesn't say anything about what was on the certificate, but it does prove that the original certificate is insufficient to prove a place of birth. You know this. It certainly does NOT say Obama was born in Kapiolani Hospital. Why did Lingle lie??

165 posted on 02/22/2011 9:21:59 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: edge919

Thank you james for providing today’s lesson material for logical fallacy 101: circular logic. Observe ...

“The Court observes that the President defeated seven opponents in a grueling campaign for his party’s nomination that lasted more than eighteen months and cost those opponents well over $300 million. Then the President faced a formidable opponent in the general election who received $84 million to conduct his general election campaign against the President. “
Illustration of the ‘non-sequitir. The cost and length of the campaign is irrelevant to Obama’s eligibility. The number and ‘quality’ of opponents ... also irrelevant.

“It would appear that ample opportunity existed for discovery of evidence that would support any contention that the President was not eligible for the office he sought.”
The court neglects to mention how such evidence was to be discovered and why that opportunity of discovery of evidence is not still available. Second, Obama didn’t produce his jpg until AFTER Hillary conceded the primary. Nobody knew he was going to produce a fake document and by the time it was realized, it was too late for these so-called formidable opponents to do anything and still look “formidable” and not “racist.”

“Furthermore, Congress is apparently satisfied that the President is qualified to serve.”
Well of course. It’s a Democrat-controlled Congress (at that time). They would be very satisfied, but this doesn’t address the satisfaction of voters/natural born citizens of the United States, does it.

“Congress has not instituted impeachment proceedings, and in fact, the House of Representatives in a broad bipartisan manner has rejected the suggestion that the President is not eligible for office.”
A classic example of circular logic; the inaction of this partisan body does not provide legal proof that Obama is or isn’t eligible ... just that they are passive about honestly and comprehensively addressing the issue (much like the judge himself).

“See H.R. Res. 593, 111th Cong. (2009) (commemorating, by vote of 378-0, the 50th anniversary of Hawaii’s statehood and stating, “the 44th President of the United States, Barack Obama, was born in Hawaii on August 4, 1961”).”
This resolution was passed without supporting legal evidence behind the claim ... the same legal evidence that the co-author now admits he cannot find as the governor of the state that allegedly issued such legal documentation. IOW, more circular, but fallacious logic.

“A spurious charge questioning the President’s legitimacy may be protected by the First Amendment. But a Court’s placement of its imprimatur upon a charge that is so lacking in factual support that it is frivolous would undoubtedly disserve the public interest.”
The only thing lacking in factual support is Obama’s nativity myth. This court obviously didn’t want to take a chance on pissing off a blissfully ignorant electorate and party in power, so he used frivolous logic and pointless demonization to make it sound meaningful. It would have been better for the judge to say “I’m too skeered to get involved. Leave me alone.”


You have your opinion and Judge Land had his. The difference is that Judge Land’s opinion matters and yours doesn’t.
Judge Land threw in a $20,000 sanction against birther attorney Orly Taitz in this lawsuit. Ms. Taitz appealed the sanction to the Supreme Court. They refused to reduce or enjoin the sanction and Ms. Taitz paid the $20,000.


166 posted on 02/22/2011 9:24:22 PM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

bookmark


167 posted on 02/22/2011 9:31:33 PM PST by southland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kleon
It would be interesting to see if anyone could explain how the certificate paper grew between the FTS scan and the factlack dot org photos.


168 posted on 02/22/2011 9:32:41 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Kleon
All I'm saying is that his argument that laser printers are unable to produce this "shadow" effect is false.

No, what you said was, "It seems like a common occurrence."

If so, then you should be able to show us numerous other COB's from the State of Hawaii that have this same problem.
169 posted on 02/22/2011 9:32:53 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
You have your opinion and Judge Land had his.

Is it duck season?? What part of the evaluation I presented do you disagree with and WHY?? Be specific. All you're doing is presenting another circular logic fallacy.

170 posted on 02/22/2011 9:36:04 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: edge919

Yes, we know. The first Fukino news release was dated Oct. 31, just a few days PRIOR to the election and AFTER Lingle finished campaigning for Juan McCain. This news release does NOT contain any claim of where Obama born. None. Why did Lingle lie??

The second media release of July 27, 2009 was to clarify what was actually on the certificate.

The second release doesn’t say anything about what was on the certificate, but it does prove that the original certificate is insufficient to prove a place of birth. You know this. It certainly does NOT say Obama was born in Kapiolani Hospital. Why did Lingle lie??


Governor Lingle didn’t lie, at worst she misspoke, not remembering the exact wording of a news release issued a year and a half earlier and at best she provided additional information from what was actually in the media release.
Dr. Fukino’s two media releases have been enough information for the courts and obviously for the vast majority of members of Congress.
Once more time, both Governor Lingle and Dr. Fukino can be deposed and interviewed under oath at any time that such a move might be needed, Thus far, it hasn’t been which means their original statements stand until and unless they are impeached in a formal proceeding.


171 posted on 02/22/2011 9:38:46 PM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
Governor Lingle didn’t lie, at worst she misspoke, not remembering the exact wording of a news release issued a year and a half earlier and at best she provided additional information from what was actually in the media release.

james, this is an excuse. Unless you have her on record saying she misspoke, we'll stick to the truth. She lied and you're passing off a demonstrable lie.

172 posted on 02/22/2011 9:46:22 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

still waiting, jamese777

Please show us where Dr. Fukino’s statements have been used by every single judge.


173 posted on 02/22/2011 9:53:21 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

By ANY judge ...


174 posted on 02/22/2011 9:56:39 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

Probably waiting for his coach’s script.


175 posted on 02/22/2011 9:57:30 PM PST by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
Governor Lingle didn’t lie, at worst she misspoke...

176 posted on 02/22/2011 9:59:28 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
Dr. Fukino’s two media releases have been enough information for the courts

What courts?

Are you lying or just misspeaking?
177 posted on 02/22/2011 10:02:49 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: jamese777
And yet Dr. Fukino’s statements have been good enough

Wrong. All court cases were dismissed from "lack of standing". None considered Fukino's statement as grounds for dismisal.

The State of HI still playing "Legal Weasel Words" games and trying to deceive the public. With the cooperation of the MSM.

Good evening my little Troll friend.

178 posted on 02/22/2011 10:21:34 PM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Actually, I’d rather trust Osama bin Laden than trust Polarik. Osama is pushing up daisies so he can’t spin.

There’s nothing new here, Polly’s point is still a red herring. But of course, now he’s hanging people’s identities out there and claiming federal crimes.

We’ve been though this stuff before, and the sane part of FR managed to drive the frothing loon off to youtube. Seems his cohorts never learns, though. He has been shown to be part of the Dem apparatus before; maybe the attack of the Polarikbots is simply part of the new Obama uprising. Stoopid is as stoopid does.


179 posted on 02/22/2011 10:23:31 PM PST by Hardraade (I want gigaton warheads now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: jamese777; bushpilot1
You miss the good old days?


180 posted on 02/22/2011 10:23:34 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 321-325 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson