Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jamese777
Dr. Fukino’s two media releases have been enough information for the courts

What courts?

Are you lying or just misspeaking?
177 posted on 02/22/2011 10:02:49 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: Brown Deer

What courts?

Are you lying or just misspeaking?


I’m talking about scores of different local, state, and federal courts all across America. Do you really think that any attorney representing Obama or any other defendant in an Obama eligibility lawsuit wouldn’t submit Dr. Fukino’s two statements and a transcript of Governor Lingle’s radio interview with their legal briefs for judges when they are seeking dismissals of lawsuits?

Where else would a judge like U.S. District Court Judge Clay R. Land down in Georgia come up with a statement in his dismissal order like: “A spurious claim questioning the President’s constitutional legitimacy may be protected by the First Amendment, but a Court’s placement of its imprimatur upon a claim that is so lacking in factual support that it is frivolous would undoubtedly disserve the public interest.”—US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Rhodes v MacDonald, 9/16/09
“Rhodes” is Captain Connie Rhodes, an Army dentist who refused to deploy to Afghanistan until she received confirmation that the Commander-in-Chief was legitimate. “MacDonald” is Colonel MacDonald, the Commandant at Fort Benning, Georgia who ordered Captain Rhodes to deploy. The case was dismissed, her attorney was fined 20-grand for filing a frivolous lawsuit and Captain Rhodes went to Afghanistan.


212 posted on 02/23/2011 10:23:48 AM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson