Posted on 03/06/2009 10:24:01 AM PST by pissant
The newest plaintiffs on the scene for lawsuits about Obama’s birth certificate are a group of military personnel, some active, some reservists, and some retired. They all share the same concern, they don’t think that our sitting President has the requirements set forth in the Constitution to be our President.
Many cases have already been submitted concerning the same issues, but all so far have either been dismissed without comment, or dismissed on the grounds of “no standing.” So far Barack Obama has spent close to $800,000 through 3 different law firms to deny access to his birth certificate, and not the Certificate of Live Birth, he showed on his website prior to the election.
In a failed case recently the law firm representing him threatened civil action if they produced the certificate and it proved their point. In another action a sitting Judge had made a similar to the effect of “awarding” damages (lawyers fees) to the loser of the case.
In the present case involving the soldiers, one active soldier who made the declaration he didn’t think Obama had the prerequisites to be the Commander in Chief, was ordered through his service agreement to not talk to the press in any way shape or form.
A Senator Mel Martinez R (RINO)-FL has made a statement as of late implying that because Americans voted him in he should be legally our President, claiming that Americans have vetted the candidates twice already, once in the primary, and then again in the general election. He then flip-flopped on the issue by stating, “federal government has the responsibility to make certain that the Constitution of the United States is not compromised. We must fight to uphold our Constitution through our courts and political processes."
In yet another stupid statement from a Senator, Jon Kyl R-AZ in an email to a constituent has stated that the question of Barack Obama’s eligibility has been settled by Snopes.com and Fact Check.com. Both organizations are left leaning, and it is ridiculous to assume that somehow they have information that the average citizen doesn’t. His office was unavailable for comment on this horrendous statement.
Unfortunately the Constitution does not provide for an enforcement mechanism, and Congress is making no effort to sign one into law. One has to wonder what Obama has to hide, and why he’d spend almost $800,000 to avoid producing a $10 birth certificate, and why with all the present law suits the US Supreme Court has so far refused to hear even one. The biggest question is why wouldn’t the Congress institute a law to avoid this in the future, unless they already know the answer to this question.
If I had the time and a little more skill with Photoshop or Gimp I would try to put that image together.
The thought is heartening.
I think his birth certificate is down Sandy Bergers pants.
TAITZ DEMANDS CONGRESS HOLD JUDICIAL HEARINGS AND ISSUE SUBPOENAS RE: OBAMA’S BIRTH AND BACKGROUND RECORDS
Attorney Orly Taitz and the plaintiffs she represents are not giving an inch in their relentless pursuit of the truth about Obama’s background.
Earlier this week, Taitz sent a 125-page dossier to Attorney General Eric Holder, demanding an immediate investigation on Obama.
Today Taitz sent a letter to State and Congressional Representatives and Senators, demanding they hold Judicial hearings in the Senate and House on the issue of Obama’s eligibility and issue subpoenas from:
1. The State of Hawaii State Department for a certified copy of Obama’s original long version (vault) birth certificate.
2. The Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, for all of Obama’s passport and immigration records.
3. The Board of Regents of Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard University for all of Obama’s college applications and financial aid applications.
4. Mr. Obama for a certified copy of all of the above records.
5. The Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, for a copy of Obama’s certification of the selective military service. According to a statement prepared by retired Federal Agent Steven Coffman, there is evidence of forgery in the certificate Obama presented to the public.
6. The Regents of the University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg FactCheck.org explanation and records, as to how did they claim to have examined Obama’s birth certificate and found it valid. Neither the State of Hawaii, nor Obama has ever released such birth certificate and there is no evidence of Obama being born in any hospital in Hawaii, and the only thing that was ever presented was limited value short version Certification of Live Birth.
More to come....
http://radiopatriot.blogspot.com/2009/03/seeking-truth-justice-american.html
wnd reported that wikipedia is blocking O B C info
Why don’t one of our Computer Commandos post pics of former Presidents Birth Certificates and compare them to obambi’s?
There should be a marked difference.
Someone will have to prey off the person's hands that are locked tightly
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.