Posted on 01/12/2009 5:34:10 AM PST by PlainOleAmerican
The highest justice official in the land will knowingly use Abraham Lincoln's personal bible to stand before the world and swear in a President who is entirely unqualified for the position...
Has Chief Justice Roberts considered the full implications of the action he will take on January 20, 2009?
At this moment in history, one man has the power to stop this monumental fraud and uphold the Constitution. That man is Chief Justice John Roberts. He can and should refuse to swear Obama into office until such time that he has delivered proof of his compliance with Article II Section I, which he has thus far spent a million dollars in legal fees refusing to do.
But if you expect Roberts to do it, you had better think again...
(Excerpt) Read more at rightsidenews.com ...
Wrong again Felix....
“Guys like that never are democratically elected.”
A guy exactly like the three I named was democratically elected and he is about to be sworn in despite his refusal to prove Constitutional eligibility.
He will get away with it because of people like you....
It means nothing to such a man, but everything to God, for whom oaths are serious matters.
“The internet” is “the people.” That’s exactly who he must prove it to...
Yeah, let’s let Acting President Nancy Pelosi sort it all out...
Yeah, let’s let Acting President Nancy Pelosi sort it all out...
So for the record, you think Obama is exactly like Castro, Chavez and Ahmadinejad. I’ll just let that speak for itself.
Mine's done. Do yours.
"The BC has been alleged a fraudulent document."
Note the word "alleged". Alleged by some guy on the internet.
"But even if it weren’t, Hawaii issued BC’s to people born outside of the US at that time..."
Another popular legend. Got proof of that?
BTW, even if it were true, which you *should* be skeptical of, that doesn't mean they put false information on the certificate. Like saying he was born in Honolulu.
Why don’t you try studying the subject for yourself before commenting?
Do a little research and then your opinion might mean something. Until then, it means nothing, as it is clear that you have made NO effort to know the facts surrounding this topic.
Wrong. It is a birth certifcate, and is legal proof.
"Even some Official Agencies of the State of Hawaii do not accept a Hawaiian COLB and require a certified long form Birth Cert. to prove their status as a citizen of Hawaii and the USA."
False. This is another of those false stories floating around about all this.
Twenty-seven posts in before something rational is said. This place is slipping.
"Do a little research and then your opinion might mean something. Until then, it means nothing, as it is clear that you have made NO effort to know the facts surrounding this topic."
Wrong. I have. But you have to go beyond what people post on forums and check for yourself. Their stories do not check out.
Before the 2010 mid-term election, you will agree...
He has far more in common with them than he has in common with me. He subscribes to democratic socialism, just as they do. I prefer freedom....
PLEASE GO TO PAGE 19 FOR BERG CASE AND READ. THEN EXPLAIN IT TO ME PLEASE! WRIT DENIED BUT NOT THE REST??
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/08ordersofthecourt.html
BERG CASE ORDER:
THE MOTION OF BILL ANDERSON FOR LEAVE TO FILE A BRIEF A AMICUS CURIAE IS GRANTED. THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CENTIORARI BEFORE JUDGEMENT IS DENIED.
But NEVER MY Prez.
“Note the word “alleged”. Alleged by some guy on the internet.”
No, reported on the internet, but alleged by numerous document authentication experts.
You should do your homework, because you are making a fool of yourself at present.
Leftists asked McCain the same question and he responded by delivering his official birth records and then congress passed a bipartisan measure laying that issue to rest for McCain.
Obama has NOT delivered his official birth records and congress has issued no formal position on the matter concerning Obama, even though suits are pending on the matter.
McCain did not spend a million bucks running from the question. But Obama has...
You are making a fool of yourself spouting off without doing the homework.
“Their stories do not check out.”
The stories do not check out where? at Snopes, owned and operated by a Berkley couple connected to MoveOn.org? At FactCheck.org owned and operated by Annenberg, who gave Ayers and Obama $50 million bucks to pilfer years ago and supported Obama’s political career from day one?
Don’t check out where?
Look up the cases, then research the law firm crisscrossing the nation defending Obama in those suits and research the money spent doing so thus far???? Most of this is now public knowledge. But one must be willing to do their own “first source” homework because the lame stream press is reporting none of it...
Some Hawaii state agencies do not accept the “Certification of Live Birth” as irrefutable verification of Hawaiian birth. There have been numerous cases when the Hawaii Family Court System required more detailed data for paternity suits. Additionally, the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands provides the following guidelines to Hawaiian natives applying for Hawaiian Home Lands homestead:
The primary documents used to show you are of age and a qualified native Hawaiian are:
- A certified copy of Certificate of Birth;
- A certified copy of Certificate of Hawaiian Birth, including testimonies; or
- A certified copy of Certificate of Delayed Birth.
“In order to process your application, DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.”
So ask yourself, why does Obama not produce his Original Birth Certificate? Is it because there is information on the ORIGINAL that will cause problems?
Yep, perpetual inaccuracies become fact as if they were adjudicated in a court of law while they proliferate across the internet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.