has anyone seen this one before?
Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
your good you got
9999 & 10000
The true “Birther” people do not trust any BC images to be real.
And guess what?
The Bomford BC is a forgery, dear people.
A bad one, too.
This is an image with the text superimposed over a scanned and folded printout.
The actual width of the Kenyan BC document is 9.5”
The visible width of the Bomford BC is only 8.1”
With a length of 11.6”, that means the printout was on 8.5” x 14” legal size paper, and the reason why the width is only 8.1”, is because most printers don’t print to the edges of the paper.
You know...the margins? They had to be removed.
You can clearly see where the top and sides were cut off.
On Taitz’s BC, the width of the bottom rule is 7.87,” while on the Bomford BC, the width of the same rule is 7.45,” so the size of the Bomford BC was reduced.
When a piece of paper is folded, the typed or printed letters running in them or over them, get distorted.
In Taitz’s BC, almost all of the letters show both their proper perspective and expected distortions to the letters that run over the fold lines. However, that document in the photo can also be a printout of a forged one, too.
Now, what is up with this?
Nearly all of the letters on the Bomford BC are not distorted in any way by the fold lines beneath them.
Example: No distortion in the “H” in “Hand”, but fold goes right under it.
Example: At the bottom is the phrase, “for the State of South Australia.” The “s” in “South” is identical to the “S” in “State,” although a big fold line runs right below the “S” in “South.”
And, what is up with this?
About 80% of all the letters have fold lines running between them.
There are two distorted fold lines that should not be there...but they also snake their way in between letters.
Now, that’s Jack!
Seems like the bugger who did this removed the perspective from an image to make it appear flat. That is what makes a straight fold line snake-like.
When I upped the contrast and lowered the bright (gamma) on the Bomford BC, there appear rainbow-colored lines (mostly blue) in place of the black ones.
Hello?
There is a multi-colored stain/spill area, about two to three inches in width, along the entire right edge, but it mysteriously stops short of “J. H. Miller” and just misses the remainder of the text below it.
Huh?
A narrower, two-shaded stain also appears on the Taitz’s photo of the Kenyan BC, but, unlike the Bomford BC, the stain does not bypass the text below “J. H. Miller.”
Hmm...
There are also phantom fold lines running perpendicular to the folds on the right side of the Bomford BC.
The fold line in the third-section down/first-section left is angled right to left, but fold line below it is perpendicular.
That would never happen that way just by folding the paper.
The Taitz BC has problems, too, like the bright reflections that only appear on the sides of a few folds.
Also, take a gander at the “A” in the two last “August” dates: all of the “A’s” before these are much darker, like a repeating key on the typewriter.
If the question is, “Which came first,” I’d have to say that the Taitz BC was not forged from the Bomford BC, but both may have come from another image.
This whole thing stinks to high Heaven, and once again, Birthers never trust any image to be real.
11,000
11,000
11,000
11,000
I rarely whine, but I will do so now.
I read this thread for serious content.
If people want to have fun trying to post at certain numbers, maybe a jocular and fun thread would be the one to do it on, hey?
When I see there have been new comments on this thread, I check here to read. When the comments consist of numbers, trying to a comment at a particluar number, it wastes my (very) precious time.
Just a thought.
Thanks, pissant.
“The true “Birther” people do not trust any BC images to be real.
And guess what?
The Bomford BC is a forgery...”
Ping to #10022
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306351/posts?page=10022#10022
Dont like to boast
:)
Thanks for your expertise
:)
LOL
Not mine. From a commentator on the Wash Independent’s website.
We are spinning our wheels with speculation about the Bomford BC.
A freeper InterceptPoint laid it out perfectly here:
excerpt
.....So how do we resolve the mystery? First you look at the Australian records. Those should be accessible to some curious Australian. If the BC of David Jeffrey Bomford is indeed listed on page 5733 of Book 44B in the South Australian archives then it is game, set and match for the lefty blogger and the Kenya BC is certainly a fake.
But what if this is not the case? Then the Bomford document is a fake giving life to the possibility but not the certainty that the Kenya BC is authentic. This can only be proven for certain by looking at page 5733 in Book 44B of the Kenya archives. Discovering with certainty that the M.R. Miller and E.F.Lavender were performing Registrar duties in the appropriate timeframes will certainly prove to me that the Bomford BC is a fake but it cannot help validate the Kenya BC. Only a search of the records can do that.
But what about fonts, jpegs, republics, Photoshop Elements? IMHO, we are just spinning our wheels with those issues. We need to get to the records or give up the hunt......
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/2308435/replies?c=621
Maybe I’m dumb - but what thread is that link from? It takes me to the comment and the ones below it, but not the thread itself. Is it this thread or another one?
It is of course an execellent point and I would hope that some freepers in AU would have already tried to do this, at least for the Bomford doc. I’d say freepers in Kenya but are there any, and if so, do they have plenty of money, good connections, and are heavily armed?
Fred Nerks? Any ideas about this?
Thank you. When Orly’s BC thing first happened, I had just come back to reading FR after a couple of months hiatus (couldn’t handle the bad news for a while) and it was exciting, read every comment on every thread that I could possibly find/find time for.
I was hoping someone in AU would get to the bottom of the numbers.
“I was hoping someone in AU would get to the bottom of the numbers.”
I think that would be like trying to validate the Hawaii CoLB by quoting the ‘certificate number’ shown on it. South Australia is thousands of miles away from where I live...and the privacy rules are strict:
http://www.ocba.sa.gov.au/bdm/applying/online/applyonline.html
Inspector Smith has rebuttal to Jerome Corsi on Ytube
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.