Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 09/23/2026 9:39:51 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
For years, we've been asking whether artificial intelligence can write like us, draw like us, code like us, or eventually replace us. Anthropic just gave us a more interesting question: Can AI notice something in nature that human scientists have been staring past?
On Wednesday, Anthropic announced that its Claude AI had identified what researchers believe is previously unrecognized biological system hidden in the DNA of bacteriophages, viruses that infect bacteria. The system contains a reverse transcriptase, a nearby partner gene, and a long array of repeating DNA sequences. Anthropic calls it ART, short for array-associated reverse transcriptases.
From Anthropic:
Today, we’re sharing early results from one of our first research programs, in which Claude autonomously discovered a novel enzyme system that is associated with an array of DNA repeats, a pattern reminiscent of CRISPR. Although we don’t yet know its function, the system that Claude discovered has a set of characteristics that have only ever been found together in a handful of other systems, all of which are programmable and perform operations like cutting, copying, and pasting DNA. Beyond CRISPR, which has already transformed science and medicine, several other such systems are now in development as promising tools.
The system that Claude found is based on a reverse transcriptase (RT), enzymes that copy RNA into DNA. While this underlying RT, found in a jumbo phage, had been identified in previous studies, Claude appears to be the first to notice the system’s defining features—an associated array of non-coding DNA sequences and an additional accessory protein of unknown function.
The enzyme itself wasn't unknown. Scientists had already catalogued the reverse transcriptase. What humans apparently missed was the larger pattern surrounding it. Claude noticed that these pieces occurred together... /p>
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
[snip] Anthropic announced that its Claude AI had identified what researchers believe is previously unrecognized biological system hidden in the DNA of bacteriophages, viruses that infect bacteria. The system contains a reverse transcriptase, a nearby partner gene, and a long array of repeating DNA sequences. Anthropic calls it ART, short for array-associated reverse transcriptases... The enzyme itself wasn't unknown. Scientists had already catalogued the reverse transcriptase. What humans apparently missed was the larger pattern surrounding it. [/snip]
Thanks for the link!
“What humans apparently missed was the larger pattern surrounding it.”
And yet the best models still give bad answers a high percentage of the time, lie, and make up links, and possess nothing remotely resembling human intelligence. All of the popular models work by recognizing patterns, so it is not surprising that it might be helpful with a problem which can be solved by recognizing patterns. Although ironically the model itself likely has no actual understanding of what it solved.
“Although ironically the model itself likely has no actual understanding of what it solved.“
Yet.
Terminator was a documentary.
Let’s see, found new stuff, eh?
“Claude discovered has a set of characteristics that have only ever been found together in a handful of other systems.”
“While this underlying RT, found in a jumbo phage, had been identified in previous studies.”
That’s not too surprising. The models are built to to find patterns. So on-task for this problem. But humans hallucinate connections all the time - ever heard of Alex Jones? That’s what you’re mostly seeing in what you’re reporting regarding poor AI performance. Hallucinations. Humans are still better at recognizing when they’ve made an unrealistic connection (well most). - but we make the connection in the first place, then correct ourselves.
Right now (and for all time, I would presume), *you* are the gut-check on AI result to call BS. I know that when I see BS in an AI result I tell it to the AI, and I often get a much better answer back.
SI?
It’s a product. If a car company is putting out cars that catch on fire you don’t close down all car manufactures. You go after folks building ‘the pinto’...
I should also add, that’s why - when I share something I got out of an AI - I usually share my prompts as well. Because, as Lily Jay has shown, you can “trick” some AIs into saying almost anything you want.
I liken it to a REALLY bright child. They can figure so much out - but they are still so naïve and so easily deceived.
A new truism...
It identified a pattern. DNA is God’s signature, of course there are patterns within patterns within patterns, a lot like Fractals within Fractals..............
Obviously a back-up system to deal with unexpected contingencies.
> NA is God’s signature,<
My thoughts exactly. What happens when AI confirms God’s existence and that the biblical story of Genesis is real? Will it get the Musk/Tesla treatment from the godless left?
EC
How long before “AI” decides that humans require “improvement” and pursues the means to achieve it through DNA modification?
AI will do a much better job reading mammograms and dental radiographs.
“and pursues the means to achieve it through DNA modification?”
Pfizer already did that.
I want the Star Trek medical plan.
Wave a diag tool over the patient. The healing device fixes you right up. Get knifed in the heart... zip zam zowiie mechanical heart installed... good as new.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
