Posted on 03/28/2025 6:26:00 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
Charlie Kirk @charliekirk11
Anna Paulina Luna alleges NBC is withholding a tape showing Lee Harvey Oswald standing next to JFK’s motorcade — not inside the School Book Depository — during the assassination. If true, this tape would radically change our understanding of his death.
From MAGA Voice
8:05 PM · Mar 28, 2025
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
Thanks for the video hs, plan to watch again so full of good information.
If NBC has proof Oswald couldn’t have done it, why don’t they release it and be heroes? What do they gain by not releasing this proof?
If memory serves, Robert MacNeil (much later of the MacNeil-Lehrer Report) was heading into the Book Depository to get to a phone (finding a pay phone was easier then :^) to call in with his prelim story about the assassination and once inside apparently asked LHO — who was on the way out of the building — where the phones were.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
building the “official” narrative may have been part of MacNeil’s initiation to the Clowns of America?
And the fact that he denies is makes it pretty obvious he has stuff to hide.
Thanks, and /bingo.
Uh, no.
Curatorial Note:
One conspiracy theory holds that the future president George H. W. Bush was present in Dealey Plaza and was somehow involved with the Kennedy assassination. This photograph and an oral history in the Museum’s collection disprove that theory.
The unidentified man at the far left is thought by some, because of a physical resemblance, to be George H. W. Bush. When Kennedy was shot, Bush, then president of the Zapata Offshore Drilling Company, a Houston-based Texas oil operation, was speaking at a Lion’s Club luncheon in Tyler, Texas, about 95 miles from Dallas.
He stopped his speech as soon as the group got word of the shooting and, according to an FBI report, called the FBI in Dallas at 1:40 p.m. with a tip that, before the assassination, he had learned the name of a man who vowed to kill Kennedy when the president came to Houston.
Bush said he would fly to Dallas with his wife, Barbara, and be available at the Sheraton-Dallas Hotel. According to Barbara Bush, they soon departed in a private plane and circled Love Field while waiting for Air Force One’s 2:45 p.m. departure. But this photograph was taken within 50 minutes of the 12:30 assassination, long before Bush could have traveled to Dallas.
In his oral history, Dallas Police officer M. N. “Nick” McDonald identified himself at the right in the photograph. As he testified to the Warren Commission, McDonald confirmed that he stayed in Dealey Plaza until hearing on the police radio that an officer had just been shot. That announcement was made just before 1:20 p.m., thus fixing the latest moment the photograph could have been taken.
And that means George H. W. Bush could not have traveled from Tyler, Texas to Dallas in time to appear in that same photo. - Gary Mack, Curator
That is completely different. The Zapruder film was studied exhaustively by the Warren Commission, as would be expected.
Subsequent disputes between the Zapruder family and news organizations over film rights to this potentially valuable piece of history offer a reasonable explanation for why the public didn’t see it until 1975.
What’s fishy about the NBC film (assuming it shows what Luna is alleging it shows) is that - unlike the Zapruder film - it is inconsistent with the Warren Commission’s findings, and was either buried by, or withheld from, the commission.
Interesting that the bullet could have come from either direction and in the front it would have been above the hairline.
“Interesting that the bullet could have come from either direction and in the front it would have been above the hairline.”
Not according to the drawing. The hole in the back would have been larger if it was an exit wound.
So who made the drawing and how come it seems to oppose the 1 doctor’s opinion of a 22 hole in the forehead?
Me too. When she said it I went “What”?
“So who made the drawing and how come it seems to oppose the 1 doctor’s opinion of a 22 hole in the forehead?”
It was made for the House Committee hearing.
The dear doctor never examined the wound.
At the hearing, the dear doctor said from his viewing that it was IMPOSSIBLE to tell whether the wound was an entrance or exit wound.
Dr McClelland said the wound in the back of the head was about five inches in diameter and the RIGHT rear part of the skull was missing. That, and the Zapruder film that shows Kennedy lurching violently backward, says to this layman that he was shot in the front.
Small bullet hole up on the forehead, horrible damage in the rear.
Kennedy’s face bore no damage except for the throat, and that could’ve been from the tracheostomy.
The bullet came from behind and ‘exploded’ outward. It’s basic ballistics.
There are many on FR who trust (blindly) what was made
for Congress, House Committees, etc. Sorry, does NOT pass
the smell test, agree with eye-witness accounts nor the
Zapruder film. You believe what you want to believe
but the truth is finally emerging, showing too many have
believed those who lie, cheat, steal, kill and destroy
to retain power, positions and money!
Basic ballistics my Ass! Please report my use of profanity
I could use the time-out from all you morons!
“Dr McClelland said the wound in the back of the head was about five inches in diameter and the RIGHT rear part of the skull was missing”
He never examined the wound. He never saw the small entry wound in the back of the head.
And he told congress that it was impossible to tell whether the the bullet was from the front or rear.
“agree with eye-witness accounts”
It agrees with eye-witness accounts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.