Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BrandtMichaels

“Interesting that the bullet could have come from either direction and in the front it would have been above the hairline.”

Not according to the drawing. The hole in the back would have been larger if it was an exit wound.


131 posted on 03/29/2025 1:51:31 PM PDT by TexasGator (/''1'111'111111111/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGator

So who made the drawing and how come it seems to oppose the 1 doctor’s opinion of a 22 hole in the forehead?


132 posted on 03/29/2025 1:54:59 PM PDT by BrandtMichaels ( 1st Peter 4:8 "Above all, love each other deeply because love covers a multitude of sins." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGator

Dr McClelland said the wound in the back of the head was about five inches in diameter and the RIGHT rear part of the skull was missing. That, and the Zapruder film that shows Kennedy lurching violently backward, says to this layman that he was shot in the front.
Small bullet hole up on the forehead, horrible damage in the rear.
Kennedy’s face bore no damage except for the throat, and that could’ve been from the tracheostomy.


135 posted on 03/29/2025 2:16:11 PM PDT by Deo volente ("When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God's creation." Pres. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson