|
Posted on 01/01/2025 12:57:31 PM PST by ransomnote
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
3038 Mar 12, 2019 2:55:14 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 4fe510 No. 5643022>Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion).
>Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions).
>Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts).
>Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs).
>Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
>Decide for yourself (be free)
Those who attack you.
Those who mock you.
Those who cull you.
Those who control you.
Those who label you.
Do they represent you?
Or, do they represent themselves (in some form)?
Mental Enslavement.
The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!Q
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
“.. machines doing all the things I can already do”. That is so well put and finally gives me a way to voice to people why it bothered me so. And just like calculators that ended the simple skill of doing math in your head. As a CPA, watching the kids coming in who only prepped returns based on inputting to software, they rarely developed the skill to understand the theory behind tax planning. It dumbs us all down by no longer having to think on our own. I have the same concern with free school breakfasts they tried to get everyone in ou district to use, regardless of income. One more responsibility of parents that they will come to think of as the govt’s job, not theirs.
GEOTUS got him, and may others in the "truther" community, to shine the light on mRNA.
🚨 NONPROFIT SPENDING WATCHDOG TOOL 🚨
🔍 FOLLOW THE MONEY: TRACK NONPROFITS & TAXPAYER DOLLARS 💰
I've built a powerful tool to help you expose potential misuse of taxpayer funds. With a few clicks, uncover how government grants are flowing into nonprofits across the country.… pic.twitter.com/xV4XLaXUWA— DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) January 22, 2025
India began administration of COVID-19 vaccines on 16 January 2021. As of 4 March 2023, India has administered over 2.2 billion doses overall, including first, second and precautionary (booster) doses.
I have an Auntie that’s a hospital admin and she says they still use spreadsheets for decision making stuff like patient releases. She says the doctors follow a decision tree protocol that comes from the admin. The tech don’t matter, it’s the people driving the tech that matter.
Wow. Didn’t know that: from all the fireworks I thought India relied on Ivermectin instead of the clot shots.
Thanks for the correction.
...any words on cardiomyopathy and/or miscarriages and/or turbo cancers over there?
Yeah, but you only hear about famous people. No telling how many lower caste people who have been eliminated in silence.
Regarding this announcement about mRNA “vaccines,” help me out here please with some answers. I really don’t have much of a circle of people to talk to these days, particularly since I work from home and in person client visits have slowed down due to change in process. I rely on you guys to get an idea of what the average person out there thinks and knows because most of you get an opportunity to talk to more people. Also, a number of you have a degree with an S in the acronym for science and thus have a head for understanding some concepts more easily.
Okay, my questions:
How many average/normal people realized the Covid vaxseems used mRNA technology vs. thinking they were typical vaxseems?
Of those who knew they used mRNA technology, how many knew this technology was really not tried and true versus thought it was already used to cure cancer?
Correct me if I am wrong, but the experimental mRNA cancer vaxseems pre 2020 were not really conceptulaized as vaxseems so much as targeted gene therapy?
Moreover, they didn’t make it as far as human trials due to the problems that were shwoing up in animal experiments?
What was the nature of these problems?
What was the news telling us about the promise of mRNA technology for cancer pre 2020 and then in 2020 when the lockdowns started and talk of a Covid vaccine started?
Is Ellison calling this mRNA AI shot thing a “vaccine?” Isn’t it more like targeted genetic therapy?
The idea is to test people regularly for cancer indications and then give them this shot before a tumor is even found?
I though the promise of mRNA technology for cancer was for something that would be used and work where other treatments failed and/or with hard to treat types of cancer. Pre 2020, was mRNA considered safe enough to try even as a last ditch effort with people who had run out options?
Is there a theoretical basis by which mRNA can work against cancer but should not be used against viruses? That is, is there a mechanism of action with it where it works in X case, but not Y?
Is mRNA thus then a treatment, an not a vaccine? Pre 2020, we were led to believe that vaccines prevent one from getting the flu, measles, tetanus, whatever. Then we were told with Covid, that, oh no, vaccines just make you get the whatever to a milder degree then you would otherwise.
So does an mRNA vaccine for cancer just make you get milder cancer? I guess that is better than the alternative.
Suppose the markers for cancer that show up in routine blood tests are just like the markers for Covid that show up in PCR tests in that a person has remnants of something they fought off and doesn’t really Covid? Do they really have cancer or just the by product of the cancer we have all the time but our body deals with?
Thanks, yes we have seen 30% + rise almost across the board.
MarQ
Okay, here is something that might answer some of my questions thanks to Winston on CTH.
____________________________________
AI, mRNA, Cancer Vaccines and “Stargate”
Reality check. Curb your enthusiasm, and beware of grifters.
Robert W Malone MD, MS
Jan 22, 2025
https://www.malone.news/p/ai-mrna-cancer-vaccines-and-stargate
“Stargate” program for mRNA cancer vaccines.
Here they go again. Really? Is this the narrative you would want to push two days into your second term as President of the USA?
Calling Susie Wiles, press room, STAT, we have an emergency narrative control problem ….
I can’t believe that we are being spoon-fed this hype from the likes of Oracle’s Larry Ellison so soon after the inauguration. Having this guy lecture us on mRNA vaccines for cancer is over the top. And apparently the prior propaganda reference to “Star Trek” (operation warp speed) is no longer effective, and we need something bigger, more potent. Something else out of science fiction television that evokes yet another trendy topic -“unidentified aerial phenomena” (UAP). “Stargate”. Perfect. What could possibly go wrong? Marketing genius.
This all makes me throw up a bit in my throat.
This is so amazingly (and dangerously) naive that I can hardly believe I am hearing it. I do not even know where to start. I am dumbfounded. The simplest summary is that this is clear-cut grifting. Precisely what I was afraid of when Bill Gates triumphantly announced his having met with President Trump.
We thought, we hoped, that President Trump had learned from the past, but this is not looking good.
Regarding Cancer Immunology and universal cancer vaccine development
[snip]
Regarding Government “Big Science Programs” choosing Winners and Losers
[snip]
Regarding “Business Development” and “Capture” involving the US Government
[snip]
Regarding innovation in mRNA or other vaccine technologies
[snip]
________________________________________________
We really need to dig into this subject and understand it.
I can’t see the link to the tool (I can’t read the comments without a profile). Can someone post the link here? Pretty please?
(no fences) - with adequate warnings; cheap and effective...
Well, of course warning signs would be mandatory.
The fences are needed too - for really stupid people and those who never learned to READ.
Trump’s executive order challenging birthright citizenship faces first legal test in Seattle court:
I cut and pasted.
I don’t have an account on X, so I don’t have access to the tool myself.
Saudi Arabia’s crown prince has told President Donald Trump the kingdom wants to invest $600 billion in the U.S. over the next four years.
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman made the comment in a phone call with Trump, the state-run Saudi Press Agency reported early Thursday.
I guess they liked the Sword dance! Maybe Melania negotiated this at her luncheon?
100% agreement here on all points. School breakfast programs have been a pet peeve of mine since my son was in elementary school. I was on the PTA committee and we spent inordinate amounts of money and time running that program. I was always opposed to having it in the first place and suggested that we knew who the impoverished families were (240 kids in the school) and could discreetly give their child(ren) some fruit, milk and a protein/breakfast bar without having a full-fledged program for everyone. The other parents and teachers on the committee thought I was quite mean to take such a position. They said they didn’t want to embarrass the neglected or very poor children so they voted for the policy that EVERY child could participate. The kids came to see it as a pre-class fun time with their friends and a warm place to be on cold winter mornings. About 2/3 of the kids in the school came for breakfast and almost all fundraising ended up going to that one program instead of events like school trips to orchards/pumpkin farms, theatre and museum visits, and gardening programs.
I didn’t know enough at that time to understand that the goal was for schools/teachers/governments to slowly assume responsibility for my child to the point where parents would eventually have none, and no rights either. We changed schools after a couple of years for reasons unrelated to the breakfast program and I heard they limited it the year after we left to … kids who really needed it! Being right too soon can make you very unpopular.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
