GEOTUS got him, and may others in the "truther" community, to shine the light on mRNA.
Regarding this announcement about mRNA “vaccines,” help me out here please with some answers. I really don’t have much of a circle of people to talk to these days, particularly since I work from home and in person client visits have slowed down due to change in process. I rely on you guys to get an idea of what the average person out there thinks and knows because most of you get an opportunity to talk to more people. Also, a number of you have a degree with an S in the acronym for science and thus have a head for understanding some concepts more easily.
Okay, my questions:
How many average/normal people realized the Covid vaxseems used mRNA technology vs. thinking they were typical vaxseems?
Of those who knew they used mRNA technology, how many knew this technology was really not tried and true versus thought it was already used to cure cancer?
Correct me if I am wrong, but the experimental mRNA cancer vaxseems pre 2020 were not really conceptulaized as vaxseems so much as targeted gene therapy?
Moreover, they didn’t make it as far as human trials due to the problems that were shwoing up in animal experiments?
What was the nature of these problems?
What was the news telling us about the promise of mRNA technology for cancer pre 2020 and then in 2020 when the lockdowns started and talk of a Covid vaccine started?
Is Ellison calling this mRNA AI shot thing a “vaccine?” Isn’t it more like targeted genetic therapy?
The idea is to test people regularly for cancer indications and then give them this shot before a tumor is even found?
I though the promise of mRNA technology for cancer was for something that would be used and work where other treatments failed and/or with hard to treat types of cancer. Pre 2020, was mRNA considered safe enough to try even as a last ditch effort with people who had run out options?
Is there a theoretical basis by which mRNA can work against cancer but should not be used against viruses? That is, is there a mechanism of action with it where it works in X case, but not Y?
Is mRNA thus then a treatment, an not a vaccine? Pre 2020, we were led to believe that vaccines prevent one from getting the flu, measles, tetanus, whatever. Then we were told with Covid, that, oh no, vaccines just make you get the whatever to a milder degree then you would otherwise.
So does an mRNA vaccine for cancer just make you get milder cancer? I guess that is better than the alternative.
Suppose the markers for cancer that show up in routine blood tests are just like the markers for Covid that show up in PCR tests in that a person has remnants of something they fought off and doesn’t really Covid? Do they really have cancer or just the by product of the cancer we have all the time but our body deals with?
numberonepal wrote:
“
“What did PDJT get him to do”
GEOTUS got him, and may others in the “truther” community, to shine the light on mRNA.
“
Many thankQs for the info!
I’ve seen a lot of wailing way BTT (on Fakebook) about the new method of fighting cancer; they claim that people will be forced to take it based on results of a blood test.
What those fearmongers don’t realize is that cancer is —not— transmittable like virii are.