Posted on 01/11/2024 12:15:52 PM PST by logi_cal869
Meilin Keen was studying for the bar exam and preparing to move to New York City last June when she started throwing up blood.
Keen, 27 years old, learned days later that she has gastric cancer. She postponed the bar exam. Brain fog from chemotherapy made it hard to do her legal work.
Surgeons removed her stomach in December. Keen is coming to terms with all that means for her diet, her health, even her dating life. “That’s a fun icebreaker: I don’t have a stomach anymore,” she said.
Cancer is hitting more young people in the U.S. and around the globe, baffling doctors. Diagnosis rates in the U.S. rose in 2019 to 107.8 cases per 100,000 people under 50, up 12.8% from 95.6 in 2000, federal data show. A study in BMJ Oncology last year reported a sharp global rise in cancers in people under 50, with the highest rates in North America, Australia and Western Europe.
ADVERTISEMENT
Doctors are racing to figure out what is making them sick, and how to identify young people who are at high risk. They suspect that changes in the way we live—less physical activity, more ultra-processed foods, new toxins—have raised the risk for younger generations.
“The patients are getting younger,” said Dr. Andrea Cercek, who co-directs a program for early-onset gastrointestinal cancer patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, where Keen was treated. “It’s likely some environmental change, whether it’s something in our food, our medications or something we have not yet identified.”
(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...
5G anyone?
I think it’s sad the way you glibly mix fact & fantasy in your posts. Interestingly the incidence of post injection malignancies in cats is noted as being 1:10k to 1:1k. The veterinary literature has not caught up to you and is unaware that oxidative stress is the cause. In fact certain vaccinations are more likely than others to result in injection site neoplasms and the relationship is well established.
https://todaysveterinarypractice.com/oncology/feline-injection-site-sarcomas/
pfizer’s and Moderna’s synthetic, unnatural mRNA is not throughout my body.
I get than you got yourself injected with their stuff, and participated in their creepy genetic engineering experiments. And I get that you feel some sort of compulsion to justify it ...
But I’ll remind you, being as I am an actual scientist, that a legitimate experiment needs a control. I’m part of the control group in your experiment.
ALWAYS a BigPharmaBot excuse, with that one.
My PhD was in biochemistry and molecular biology.
Biochemistry is the study of the structure and function of proteins.
Molecular biology is the study of the structure and function of nucleic acids.
This means that I have studied (and researched in the lab) these topics to a level of detail that most people cannot even imagine.
Contrary to your belief, the mechanisms of mRNA activity in the cell are *very* well understood. When I say that there is no mechanism for an mRNA to cause cancer, that's because there is, in fact, no biological mechanism. mRNA lives and dies in the cytoplasm of the cell and never enters the nucleus or the mitochondria. Cancer develops because of aberrations in gene control which happen to the DNA which is located in the nucleus and in the mitochondria. Since mRNA does not interact with DNA, it cannot be carcinogenic.
Likewise, the normal function of the adaptive immune system to analyze antigens and produce antigen-specific T-cells, B-cells, and antibodies is also not a carcinogenic process. Since this particular immune function starts to develop in newborn babies and keeps developing until their late teens, it's unlikely babies would survive very long at all if something about it were carcinogenic.
It will be exponentially higher since it’s introduction. Keep lying to yourself that the “vax” is safe...LOL
Actually, you are not the control group. ExDemMom’s heroes and paymasters at CDC and pfizer unblinded the control group so no one had any basis of comparison. There is no control so no one can ever know how damaging the actual data was.
Ugh.
When you are infected with a virus, that virus takes over cells in your body and forces them all to make virus mRNA. This includes spike (not spile) mRNA. So, when you get sick with a virus, you have tons of foreign mRNA in your own cells, forcing your cells to make millions of new virus particles. If the little bit of mRNA in a vaccine is so dangerous, then why isn't a vast quantity of mRNA that viruses put into your body infinitely more dangerous?
As for the rest of your post, I'm going to leave it. You obviously read and (somewhat) memorize a lot of antivax propaganda, but you have no understanding whatsoever of the real science behind vaccines or immunology.
That’s some industrial strength stupid right there.
All the examples you cited are not encased in a lipid nanoparticle designed to thwart your immune system and infect your cells.
And really, it would be interesting to compare the relative harm of the COVID shots and the colossally stupid food pyramid.
Just so baffling, since we cannot blame you know what on you know what.
Have you read the articles that you linked? The TVP article you linked states, and I quote, "Tumors also occur secondary to injections of steroidal and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, and lufenuron; microchip implantation; and inflammatory response to nonabsorbable surgical suture material."
Please read the article thoroughly. It is very clear about the fact that the sarcomas are related to the injection, not to the contents of the injection. Gee, even sutures cause the type of oxidative stress injury that (rarely) induces a sarcoma.
Its up at MSN for free.
Oh I agree, the possible factors are many.
I just wish the CDC would do their jobs and actually run some controlled experiments and publish the data. Particularly regarding the vaccines. They seem to take a head in the sand approach regarding anything controversial.
And without a doubt, our diets are probably the culprit regarding a lot of ailments.
The lipid nanoparticle is a protective envelope that allows the mRNA to survive long enough until it can be endocytosed into a cell. No, the brief presence of the mRNA for a few hours inside a cell is not an infection. By definition, an infection is the process by which a virus enters a cell and takes over its function. In order to establish an infection, a virus uses a number of proteins which simply are not present in a liposome coated mRNA particle.
Viruses, FYI, are also encased in lipids. Viruses use their spike (or equivalent, in other virus species) protein to attach to the outside of the cell. Once the cell engulfs them, they quickly disable the normal functions of the cell and force it to make virus mRNA, genome, and proteins and assemble them into new virus particles. That's all that cell does until it is so full of millions of virus particles that it bursts open.
Given a choice between a simple vaccine that causes the production of an antigen for a few hours and a viral infection that literally takes over millions/billions of cells in my body and turns them into virus factories before killing them, I'll choose the vaccine.
is 2019 the latest data available?
seems at least 2022 would be available by now
The only thing "unnatural" about the vaccine mRNA is that the virus spike gene was modified slightly so that the spike protein made from that mRNA template remains in the same shape it has on the surface of a virus. This is because antibodies that recognize spike with that particular shape actually block the spike from attaching to the ACE2 receptor. Other than that, everything about the mRNA is completely natural. It is made in living bacteria who use their own natural RNA polymerases to synthesize the mRNA using completely natural nucleotides. Yes, even the pseudouridine used to make spike mRNA that the immune system's RNA destroying cells doesn't recognize is completely natural.
No mRNA, regardless of the source, lasts for more than a few hours inside a cell. Once it has attached to a ribosome, directed the formation of protein molecules, and falls off the ribosome, it is destroyed.
I have tons of non-human mRNA in my body because 1) I keep eating other organisms, and 2) I have trillions of microorganisms living in my body. Guess what? You also have tons of foreign mRNA in your body, for the same reasons. The presence of non-human RNA and DNA is completely natural.
Data collection takes a lot of time to do correctly. At least for research purposes.
nonsense
Then publish the data and parse it by age cohort. The data should speak for itself. Although, I have to admit, based on the past few years I would not trust anything published by the CDC and FDA.
And don't you think that requiring children to receive 50+ shots is beyond the pale?
How can you be certain that they don't cause anything amiss? Particularly if the results aren't tracked? We can't possibly know that the vaccines might not cause cancer cells to grow in the recipient. And since vaccines are often grown in different animals (mice, etc), we can't be sure if the vaccines might not carry cross species contaminants to the recipient.
Based on the past few years, I'm not buying the 'trust us, we know more than you' wave of the hand by the Medical community. They destroyed decades of trust (well deserved, or not) in a record short period of time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.