Posted on 11/14/2023 12:17:51 PM PST by Red Badger
Gladiators fought in rounds, and there were referees to enforce rules. Only rarely were gladiators killed.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
Gladiators rarely died in fights, as gladiatorial combat was more about demonstrating physical and mental endurance, martial skill, and athleticism.
There were between 20 and 30 different styles of gladiatorial combat. Gladiators would adopt a style based on their body type and the choice of their trainers.
Gladiatorial fights had rules, including fighting in rounds. Referees were present to enforce rules, caution fouls, and handle appeals.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
One of the most iconic moments in movie history is when Russell Crowe, dressed in leather and brandishing a bloodied gladius, turns to an awe-struck and silent coliseum to shout, “Are you not entertained?” Yes, Russell, we are. Very much so. Whether it be big-screen Hollywood blockbusters, TV historical dramas, or Las Vegas live shows, people love the idea of ancient gladiatorial fights.
What’s there not to love? There’s blood, sweat, and tears. There’s swinging, punching, kicking, and slashing action, punctuated by shocking gore and the promise of imminent death. In the bloodthirsty chants of a frenzied crowd, we see our shadow selves. We may tut at the Rome Colosseum, yet we cannot turn our heads away from the violence.
One problem, though, is that we get so much of it wrong. The history we see is very different from the history as it was. To help sort Roman history from Roman myth, Big Think spoke with Alexander Mariotti. Mariotti has been a consultant on big shows like HBO’s Rome, Starz’s Spartacus: Blood and Sand, and Paramount Pictures’ Hercules. He is currently consulting on the new Gladiator movie (2024) and Colosseum on the History Channel. Here, we unpack three myths popular culture gets wrong.
. . . . Myth #1: Fights to the death . . . .
Maximus Decimus Meridius is on a rampaging killing spree. Spartacus has just decapitated his third opponent. The emperor gives a somber thumbs down. In all cases, the message is the same: Gladiators die. One of the more common myths we have about gladiators is that it was a death match. Two would enter, and only one would leave.
According to Mariotti, though, this is all wrong. Gladiator fights were only rarely, or accidentally, to the death. There are two reasons for this. First, gladiatorial combat was first and foremost about demonstrating “what the Romans called virtus, which was physical and mental endurance, as well as martial skill.” The truth to Russell Crowe’s Gladiator is the eerie silence after he massacres his opponents. People were there to watch a sport; they wanted to see training, talent, and athleticism. Killing someone in the first minute offers none of that.
Second, gladiators were expensive. Gladiators would each receive months of training from a doctores. They would get the best medical care from the finest physicians of the day. The Roman physician Galen, who went on to define European medicine for 1500 years, learned his craft as a doctor to gladiators. Given the huge cost of training and keeping a good and popular gladiator, it makes sense that people would be reluctant for them to die. In fact, gladiators were often covered by huge insurance policies. As Mariotti tells Big Think, “You would have to pay anything between $400 and $430,000 to make up for the damages… because if my guy comes to your party or your event and he hurts himself, I’ve lost earnings, and I have a contract with him.”
Mariotti emphasized that boxing, involving fights to unconsciousness, and wrestling, with its choking holds, would have killed far more people than weapon fights.
. . . . Myth #2: All fights were the same . . . .
Gladiatorial combat was a sport. It was about proving who had the most virtus. And so it was much more complex and varied than we might suppose. Mariotti says we would do well to compare it with modern MMA. This wasn’t just about who was the best fighter; it was also about the best fighting style.
Mariotti tells us that there were between 20 and 30 different styles of gladiatorial combat. However, like MMA, while there may be dozens of fighting styles, most gladiators tended to gravitate toward a handful. The style you adopted usually depended on your body type, athleticism, and what your doctores chose for you. “One of the most famous is the retiarius,” Mariotti tells Big Think. “He’s famous because he’s quite unique in that he’s probably the least armored discipline in gladiator combat.” The retiarius usually only had shoulder armor and light arm coverings. At the other end of the spectrum, you had the murmillo, who would wear heavy, segmented armor and leg coverings and carry a shield.
A retiarius “would have to be quick. He’s more about speed,” while a murmillo would bide their time and work “systematically and tactically.” It would have been David versus Goliath. One difference between MMA and ancient gladiatorial fights was that there were no weight categories. In fact, the opposite was the case. Today, a heavyweight (murmillo) would never fight a featherweight (retiarius). But the Romans wanted to know what style of fighting was best as well as body type.
. . . . Myth #3: There were no rules . . . .
The Colosseum really was more like a boxing or MMA ring than a battlefield. Like almost all sports in history, gladiatorial fights had rules. As Mariotti puts it:
“There absolutely were rules. We know that, for example, if a gladiator tripped, he was allowed to stand up because one of the things that we don’t really get told often about gladiators is that they fought in rounds. If you look at modern sports, there’s no single physical combat sport that is not fought in rounds. And the simple answer is that, physically, we are unable to maintain an anaerobic level of intensity for more than a couple of minutes. Now add some armor, add big helmets, and weapons, and your physical exhaustion becomes tenfold. We have a tendency to make people into mythological characters. Of course, Gladiators didn’t fight for hours; they fought in rounds.”
The other big omission Hollywood tends to make concerns referees: Gladiatorial fights usually had two of them. “There was the summa rudis and the secunda rudis, who were basically the two referees — one in the middle and one on the side, exactly like every sport today.” There were fouls, cautions, and appeals. . . . .
Blood, sand, and human nature . . . .
For Mariotti, the reason why it is important to challenge myths is to recognize that the Roman people were not alien, brutal, bloodthirsty monsters. They did not gather in tens of thousands to watch torture and death. They gathered to watch a sport. “The concept of two men showing physical prowess —showing skill and bravery — is such an ingrained human desire that I think the Colosseum exists today and will always exist. Which is why I’m not surprised that MMA is the fastest growing sport. So maybe the biggest misconception we have is that we’re entirely different from the Romans.”
I enjoyed reading this. I was entertained.
“I’m not surprised that MMA is the fastest growing sport.”
I am an athlete, love sports and great athletes including boxing, and I always will. But I have no interest in MMA.
You like articles about gladiators?................
I like the movie “Leather Heads” Football at its finest. Same team plays both offense and defense and hardly any rules.
Yes, American football was derived from Rugby...which was derived from Medieval Ball.
Good one!
I’ll bet Joey has been in a Turkish prison, though.
I feel sure that the Metatron, Raffaello Urbani, would totally agree with everything in this article.
‘For Mariotti, the reason why it is important to challenge myths is to recognize that the Roman people were not alien, brutal, bloodthirsty monsters. They did not gather in tens of thousands to watch torture and death. They gathered to watch a sport. ‘
Welllll....except for that whole christians and lions thing...that was kinda bloodthirsty....
They had to close the Colosseum in Rome because the lions ate up all the prophets.
Thanks, will ping a little later.
The arenas in HBO’s Rome were authentic to that time period (mid-1st c bc), btw.
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Commodus
[snip] Meanwhile, Commodus was lapsing into insanity. He gave Rome a new name, Colonia Commodiana (Colony of Commodus), and imagined that he was the god Hercules, entering the arena to fight as a gladiator or to kill lions with bow and arrow. On December 31, 192, his advisers had him strangled by a champion wrestler, following his announcement the day before that he would assume the consulship, dressed as a gladiator. A grateful Senate proclaimed a new emperor—the city prefect, Publius Helvius Pertinax—but the empire quickly slipped into civil war. [/snip]
https://www.history.com/news/commodus-worst-roman-emperor-gladiator
[snip] In one instance he assembled a large number of men who had lost their feet, dressed them up as serpents, gave them sponges to throw at him in lieu of rocks and clubbed them to death, pretending they were giants. He seems to have been more careful with actual gladiators, never killing any but slicing off the occasional ear or nose. Of course, they had the good sense to let him win their matches.
In all, Commodus reportedly claimed to have won some 12,000 contests in the arena, while also bragging that he had done it left-handed. [/snip]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodus#Commodus_the_gladiator
[snip] Commodus also had a passion for gladiatorial combat, which he took so far as to take to the arena himself, dressed as a secutor. The Romans found Commodus’ gladiatorial combat to be scandalous and disgraceful. According to Herodian, spectators of Commodus thought it unbecoming of an emperor to take up arms in the amphitheater for sport when he could be campaigning against barbarians among other opponents of Rome. The consensus was that it was below his office to participate as a gladiator. Popular rumors spread alleging he was not actually the son of Marcus Aurelius, but of a gladiator his mother Faustina had taken as a lover at the coastal resort of Caieta. [/snip]
Selections from four related keywords, sorted:
Commodus was flushed.....................
Tertullian refers to the popular demand, "The Christians to the lion." This may have contributed to the idea that most of the martyrs were killed by lions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
