|
Posted on 04/27/2022 8:33:47 PM PDT by ransomnote
Transcript of Riccardo Bosi's warning ["No consent. No consent. No consent"]
Ricardo Bosi explains what's really going on in the Ukraine (TRANSCRIPT and 3 minute video)
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
I helped develop the business end of DECnet, utilizing the RS 2780(?) family of boards in 1982.
Slide it in, pop-out the flimsy phone jack, connect to the 7200baud modem and start dialing.
Thrilling days, bruh.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 04/27/22 Vol.403, Q Day 1743, EasySt wrote: “I’ve thought that no one (Admin, Jim) would have time to manage non-essentials like keywords”
~~~~~~~
Straw man argument. The coding to change the behavior of keyword adding
to remove their potential for anonymous harassment, while preserving their
complete functionality, could hardly be more trivial.KEEPING it as is, to preserve the anonymous harassment potential, is also easy,
but it does have a cost, and sends a clear message.*
'Managing non-essentials' entails so much more than HTML coding.
Prioritizing tasks based on the number of persons served providing the most good and weighing the various needs for benefit/cost analysis must also happen.
Given FR has functioned since the 80's and continues to function well, I don't know how or why the keywords suddenly became a make-or-break issue for some. In the past 4 1/2 years that I've been posting Q threads nothing changed, and suddenly the presence of rude keywords are now intolerable?
Here's the keywords posted on my thread from 1/20/2018. Note the keyword "spamsonnote" failed to repress or harass me for the 4+ years it's been there. I usually don't even look at the key words, and if I do, I still post what I want to share. Keywords don't silence free speech.
Q Anon: Some housekeeping rules that will keep the place tidy (freerepublic.com)
I'm with Melian on this - I think the flak we take is a badge of honor. Furthermore, we ignore the flak and keep posting because 'nothing can stop what's coming'.
Sometimes if I get irritated with the constant barrage of ridicule (direct at me or keywords), I make it a point to just go post more truth my detractors hate.
I'll never attempt to drive a website the size of FR, but if I did I couldn't put 'keyword harassment' at the top of my prioritized list, not while pressing for free speech at the same time.
I am not among those receiving the 'clear message' you perceive. I think different platforms attract and maintain different clientele. Some audiences overlap. Viva la difference!
note her left had is mimicking the baphomet statue positioning
Relax,it is not worth it for your health.
-——Given FR has functioned since the 80’s——
It hasn’t and what’s more, neither has the internet
Free Republic has changed greatly from an important activist force to a prelude of Twitter
Yeah I meant ‘98 and typed ‘80s. The ability to edit posts after clicking ‘send’ would be on my Christmas list, if I had one. :D
Like a BOSS!
Finland's proper response should have echoed that of General Sir Charles Napier, commander-in-chief of British forces in India, in regards to the Hindu practice of sati:
"This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property."
Instead, they folded. Cowards.
Alito draft SCOTUS opinion on Roe (98 pages)
https://www.scribd.com/document/572583975/Scotus-Initial-Draft-Opinion-Against-Roe-v-Wade#fullscreen
OMW! That is perfect!
Is this a boon to \The Plan\?
If anti-SCOTUS violence gets hot (as this leak was intended to do, because racist), will we need some “military intervention” in the “large urban heat-sinks” to quell it?
[Side note: Are patriots willing to give-up Portland and Seattle?]
If the SCOTUS decision is changed because of the violence, would we now see the courts declared non-functional and justice being meted out by Courts, martial?
[Side note: Do ‘We the People’ have to request this/both?]
Does the virulent left really want to go there?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
