Posted on 07/23/2021 3:37:34 PM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T Cathi]
ransomnote: Dr. McCulloughs professional background is in Post #1.
ransomnote: Excellent 25 minute video. Notes on the first 7 minutes of the video here:
Stew Peters: Dr. McCullough has published a treatment protoccol for early outpatient treatment of Covid in the American Journal of Medicine, and subsequent updates to the protocol in reviews. He has 46 peer reviewed articles on the infection, has commented on the Covid crisis on The Hill, Laura Ingram and Fox News Channel.
Nov 19, 2020, Dr. McCullough in the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and throughout 2021 in the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services, Colorado General Assembly, and New Hampshire Senate concerning many aspects of the Covid Pandemic Response.
Dr. McCullough has had one full year of dedicated academic and clinical effort in combatting the Sars COV2 virus and in doing so has reviewed thousands of reports. He's participated in scientific congresses, group discussions, press releases, and has been considered among the worlds top experts on Covid-19.
He was originally a proponent of the vaccine. Then he witnessed the adverse reactions and has since come out adamantly against the Covid vaccines.
Dr. McCullough: The information about the vaccine trials released by the pharmaceutical companies was initially quite promising. The 'attack rate' (rate at which people were succeptible to Covid infection) in the trials was less than 1% which was very low compared with Covid infection rates published for the general public. This was unusual given the rates of Covid last fall (same time as trials), so he believes trial participants were particularly healthy.
The adverse reactions reported for the trials occurred in the arm, but there were any major systemic adverse reactions. Through December, January February, 70% of his patients in Baylor Hospital, Dallas received the Covid-19 vaccine. He didn't order the vaccines, doctors don't prescribe them, patients volunteered for them. It's completely voluntary.
Looking back now, on Janary 22, 186 deaths had already occurred following Covid-19 vaccinations. The threshhold of concern is about 150 or so.
In general we get about 150 for all the vaccines combined; 500 million shots per year across 70 vaccines. So, for a single vaccine (Covid), for only 27 million having gotten the vaccine by that time, to have 150 deaths - that should have been the alarm signal.
ransomnote: Jan 22, the rate of deaths reported following Covid-19 vaccinations was 20 times greater than the average rate for vaccines reported annually. Since they did not stop then, and the death rate grows beyond belief, it's obvious no level of deaths will stop this 'vaccine' program. They know it's killing people, and as it only gets worse, they only push harder to force us to take it.
Dr. McCullough: I think if we had a Data Safety Monitoring board, I think they would have shut it down in February of 2021.
Stew Peters: Notes 25 deaths shut down the Swine Flu vaccine. Some of the most deadly days in the United States (9/11) are small compared with the harm caused by the Covid vaccines (e.g., 9/11). Asks, How did you come to the conclusion that these deaths or adverse conditions were actually related to the vaccine?
Dr. McCullough: "Initially we didn't know as these deaths continue to mount. On two occaissions in March and June, the CDC put on their website that they had looked at the deaths and none of them were related to the vaccine. And so doctors in my circles were questioning this because patients were immediately dying after the vaccine, in the vaccine centers, or then shortly thereafter we would be called about some type of fatal event that's happened whether it's at home, or patients come to the hospital with some type of fatal event."
ransomnote: I believe this is the most successful psychological attack on the public's behavior - the public seems to accept that we cannot observe people dropping dead before leaving the vaccine center as relevent information.
Direct observation and natural self preservation instincts are treated as vindictive rumors and shameful fears.
I've seen videos of dogs that will drop food or treats if a stuffed animal approaches their food dish, pretends to eat, and then drops over 'dead'. The dogs spit their food out and walk away. Not us. If the CDC says 'eat it, it's good for you' and the MSM ridicules those who don't, compliance and a 'new reality' are born.
We're not stupid. We're up against CIA brainwashing/indoctrination techniques perfected over decades for the purpose of controlling the public.
However, we have grown soft and fearful as a result. We have to return to being the strong Americans we once were in order to survive this.
What does it matter if murderous traitors ridicule us? The approval of those who work to enslave and kill us can only be won by complying and dying.
"And so two important analyses came forward. One by McLaughlin from London and one by Rose, from Israel using the VAERS data."
They basically concluded this: 50% of fatalities following vaccination occur within 48 hours of injection. 80% occur within one week. 86% of the deaths have no other explanation (other than Covid 'vaccine'). They are well enough to walk into an ambulatory center to have a vaccine, and then within 2 days they've died.
"So it's my judgement, and I've done a lot of work on Data Safety Monitoring boards and Clinical Review boards, it's my judgement at this point in time, that in fact, the vaccine is the cause of the death in the majority of cases."
ransomnote: This is the MSM's biggest wartime accomplishment. Dr. Wuhan Fauci is still portrayed as the one in charge of protecting us against the biowarfare agents he helped produce and implement. He and the CDC worked to deny medication and treatment to those who are sick, and they are in charge of the US response to Covid.
Dr. McCullough and others have more experience and success treating and saving Covid patients, but the MSM and the Biden Administration officials have convinced the public that Anthony Fauci is our physician. Even though Fauci claims there are no safe, effective treatments for Covid, we're conspiracy theorists if we take medical advice from physicians specializing in the successful treatment of Covid.
Bill Gates is wrapped around the NIH, WHO and the CDC. He's been a business parter employing Anthony Fauci for years. Gates is the largest donor to these agencies and and through them directs public health in most of the world, including the US. By coincidence, Gates primary goal in life is depopulation. Who takes medical advice from a eugenecist?
The MSM is succeeding in elevating the malevolence of Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci over actual medical expertise. The public is taking medical advice from Mengele. It's killing us.
Stew Peters: What about long term impacts, deaths expected in the future?
Dr. McCullough: Well there are Tenets of Causality. It's called the Hill's Tenets of Causality, and that means, 'how do we asses if anything is really related to, say, the administration of a vaccine?'.
1. The first would be the temporal relationships, so I told you, in time, it's really closely related to the injection.
2. The biologic plausability: We know the vaccines cause the production of the dangerous spike protein which itself can be damaging to organs and be fatal, so we know the mechanism of action if we have an exaggerated response or uptake of the viral genetic products into the human body, that in fact the spike protein can be lethal. So, the biologic plausibility is there.
ransomnote: Ending my notes at the 7 minute mark. The whole video is excellent.
~~~~~~~~~
Our enemies have control of communications. It's how they indoctrinate and deploy a continuous stream of psychological techniques that are working. MSM and Social Media are the weapons depots of our enemies.
Even the constantly changing opinions of Fauci and the CDC are a known, documented CIA technique (it's not just that they are incompetent). By constantly shifting warnings, advice, encouagement, warnings, threats etc., they actually make the public MORE dependent on them. It's weird but it works. On an unsteady information landscape, the public begins to cling to the next dispatch with increasing tenacity in order to steady themselves.
We need to resist and they will falsely portray resistance as violence.
Perhaps boycotting communications would work. So many are currently addicted, literally, by design, to the poisonous messaging being used to defeat us psychologically, spiritually, physically.
CNN ratings are tanking but our enemies continue to fund them - there's no way they are self supporting at this point. The money losing proposition shows the importance of false, continuous indoctrination. Our enemies will spend every dime (much of it ours) on controlling and delivering continuous psyops to the public. It's their primary means of control and it will only get worse.
They are pretending to be uncertain about implementing vaccine passports. China has decided we will have them so it doesn't matter how Newsom, Biden, Fauci et. al. pretend to dither. All those sold out to China for big money. China owns them. China will accept nothing less than vaccine passports like theo nes they currently use to absolutely enslave their own people. The more time passes, the less resistance will remain and that's they only reason they are pretending to back down. Indoctrinate, equivocate, retreat, return - it's an act and resistance is diminishing.
Our strongest resistance will be that which we implement soonest. WE have more strength now, physically, spiritually, and psychologically, and they are chipping away at us to weaken us into compliance and defeat.
Boycotts, attending church, socializing with family, breaking isolation and TURNING THE MEDIA OFF. They need to know we stopped listening to the indoctrination. THey need to know we choose our own 'experts', and we're getting together locally and talking with one another. Together we are strong - that's why they are fanning social unrest (race, religion, Dem/Republican etc.).
Product boycotts for advertisers? Any visible signs we are unplugged from the MATRIXX could help.
Ghandi may have ideas for us in peaceful, lawful, protests.
Dr. Peter McCullough - URGENT WARNING About Poisonous Jabs - "An Agonizing Situation" (rumble.com)
Blackrock is also buying up entire new home tracts all over the country with plans to rent them out. Remember the Marxist mantra is “you’ll own nothing...and be happy.” We’re renting currently but plan to buy a house again in the near future. I’m just afraid we might miss the boat by then thanks to greedy companies like Blackrock and progressive politicians in DC.
I honestly believe that any doctor who believes that people should be forced to get the jab (or coerced) should have their medical license revoked.
“ I’m getting tired of “the jab will kill you” and “ you can get covid again” threads.”
That’s odd. What about freedom to refuse the jab? Maybe you have a case of buyer’s remorse? Maybe you chose to be vaxxed and that’s your privilege, so let others choose.
Otherwise, it’s the exact opposite of what your page stipulates!
https://freerepublic.com/~mikelets456/
Just say no to the click .
Would NEVER be happening if they would have allowed treatment methods to go forward. Instead they crucified anyone, including DJ Trump for even mentioning treatment methods.
With EARLY treatments, the death rates for this thing would have been way less. EARLY treatments. Not waiting till they had to be put on a machine.
The more the liars like Dr Mengele Fauci push this thing, the less people will accept it.
This guy is done. They will crucify him.
Anyone remember when DJ Trump had that presser and he said that big pharma doesnt like him? And that he might not be around?
Remember that?
Helpful Tip
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/blackrock-vanguard-own-big-pharma-media/ ?fbclid=IwAR2dlPB3vJyb7uNwIDMIS-jEPlUUL5XNE2oBf_KJjCNDgcI9G0PcfgDD65I
I broke the link into two parts. The first part is the actual link and is all you need. The second part starts with ?fbclid and is a facebook derived url and they’ll get credit for it on many websites or in email campaigns. The website’s analytics will consider facebook as the source of the link.
On most links like that, the question mark and everything after it can be removed.
Click them both and they both go to the same page but the long link will make Children’s Health Defense think you’re coming from facebook.
I take my vitamins, follow a healthy lifestyle, use hand sanitizer when I’m out, try to keep my distance around strangers, and pray. I have no plans to get the vaccine at this time, especially since the virus I experienced wasn’t severe enough to warrant putting an experimental substance into my body. I’ve never gotten a flu shot either because I’ve never had the flu, so I must be doing something right.
Amen.
Probably ought to just scroll on by posts by ransomnote then. Many of us scroll on by certain threads due to the subject.
Will anyone, in his right mind, knowingly inject poison into his body to “stop COVID?”
No.
And in case you were curious, I’m not going to sprinkle rat poison on my dinner, either.
Only a fool will listen to these Satanic Deep State Creeps and their incessant lies about “safe and effective” poisons.
Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right
Here I am, stuck in the middle with you
you read my mind
And the big pharma vax shills will discredit everything about someone, no matter how credentialed they are.
The legitimate credentials of people who are experts in their fields mean nothing to anonymous, internet vax shills, who have very little credentials or experience themselves.
1. The first would be the temporal relationships, so I told you, in time, it's really closely related to the injection.
If the doctor understands VAERS I'm a little surprised he doesn't see the fallacy in this temporal relationship line of thought.
Since VAERS is all based on self-reporting and not on ongoing surveillance it's a given you'll see more events reported close to the vaccination date.
It's simple human nature. If some medical issue arises you'll be much more likely to connect it with a shot you got yesterday than a shot you got 10 days ago.
The only way this analysis has validity is if you actively monitor people getting the vaccine and consistently document issues, and then compare those numbers against a control group that didn't get the vaccine.
Naturally, this list will continue to grow unfortunately.
Keeping in mind that these reports are only a fraction of the data out there and only those reports that the praetorian guard media & tech have let out.
Psaki refuses to answer question on WH ‘breakthrough’ Covid cases… (07.23.2021)
‘Why do you need that information?’
Also keeping in mind, that these vaccines are NOT approved and licensed and are only available to the public at large because of Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA). Each of the manufactures were given authorization to "prevent" covid. There is nothing in their EUA's about lessoning hospital stays or deaths. Only, prevention of covid.
Pfizer's EUA:
"the FDA decision is based on the totality of scientific evidence available showing that the product may be effective to prevent COVID-19 during the COVID-19 pandemic and that the known and potential benefits of the product outweigh the known and potential risks of the product. All of these criteria must be met to allow for the product to be used in the treatment of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is in effect for the duration of the COVID-19 EUA declaration justifying emergency use of these products, unless terminated or revoked (after which the products may no longer be used)."
Moderna's EUA: "Having concluded that the criteria for issuance of this authorization under Section 564(c) of the Act are met, I am authorizing the emergency use of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19"
Janssens's EUA: "On February 27, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for emergency use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 for individuals 18 years of age and older pursuant to Section 564 of the Act."
Both Moderna and Janssen's EUA's are based on preventing covid. Is this what prevention look like? Pfizer's EUA is based on "may" prevent covid. OK, some wiggle room there. If 1 in one hundred million doesn't get covid, but the other 99,999,999 do after taking their experimental shot, they can say...look, our agreement is that it may prevent covid.
These vaccines were given Emergency Authorization to be widely distributed and administered to "prevent" covid.
How many people, especially those that are not elderly or have pre-existing health concerns who have gotten the experimental medicine, would have changed their minds if they knew they had a much higher percentage chance (than being reported by the govt & the manufacturers) of getting covid, that they would have to got back to wearing a piece of cloth over their mouth and nose and be limited to large indoor (& outdoor) events anyway?
Would they take the chance of getting one or more of the reported side effects knowing the above?
Are these error rates acceptable to meet those EUA's and keep these unlicensed vaccines widely available outside a typical controlled study phase?
AFAIC, if science and honesty were the driving force, their EUA's would be revoked.
you’ll immediately be shamed ‘it’s for the common good’!
***************************************************************************************
But it is not actually for the common good, and there are scientific studies which prove that.
We now know they lied about it being “novel”-it is not totally new and 81% of the population in fact does have existing immunity. We also know that immunity is strengthened, materially so, by natural infection.
A good example is Chicken Pox. If you had that in childhood, then your children and grand children getting it helps tune up your immune system and keep that immunity.
From a public health perspective you want those people who are not going to be seriously harmed to get it naturally, because it is that type of immunity that stops the disease from being of harm to the public on a durable basis.
The existing vaccines are worthless for building said durable immunity since the data is that the nucleocapsid section, which the vaccines do not code, is where most of the pre-existing resistance against serious disease resides.
A traditional inactivated vaccine without the spike protein would be better, and since we now know the spike is leading to damage/deaths, less risky.
The future of the world in terms of public health in fact requires that young and healthy people; be allowed to develop natural, durable immunity.
To these JABs, Lockdowns, Nose diapers, in the face of science documenting that you did it wrong goes beyond the realm of stupid and into the realm of criminal culpability.
I for one, would like to see these ghoulish Quacksters like Fauci arrested, tried, convicted, and punished for crimes against humanity.
They are knowingly coming after the CHILDREN and BABIES with stuff that is NOT good for them.
I don’t give a flying leap what they say about me, I will speak out against the travesty. And I’m phoning and writing my state legislators with all the SCIENCE I can to prove that they need to stand against this crap - and make it clear before school opens - NO MANDATES from anyone.
Some information on the neutralizing nucleocapsid is in this study from Nature Immunology Jan. 2020 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41590-020-00808-x.pdf
Don’t worry if we beat the commies there will be lots of affordable housing. If we don’t beat the commies it won’t matter.
Thank you for supplying the link, greeneyes!
👍😎You betcha. And ICYMI, here’s another link related to another scientific bit of info:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3978587/posts?page=37#37
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.