Posted on 07/19/2021 12:08:40 PM PDT by MNDude
this was not surprising "because the vaccines are not 100% effective".
"They're very, very effective, but not 100%, and as a higher proportion of the population is double-vaccinated, it's inevitable that those 10% of that very large number remain at risk, and therefore will be amongst the people who both catch the infection and end up in hospital."
(Excerpt) Read more at news.sky.com ...
What percentage of the people who have been vaccinated were vaccinated with a two shot formulation?
So 60% of the population is vaccinated, and 60% of the infected are fully vaccinated. In other words, the effect of the vaccine is invisible. Sure sounds like a highly effective vaccine.
I guess they are not “VERY VERY” effective. So much baloney told by the Vax pimps.
What percentage of those not vaccinated because of pre-existing conditions and ended up catching COVID-19?
Fausi didnt announce that on CNN so its misinformation...
Paging FaceAcheBook....
Many American sheep only saw the very very effective words. The rest blew right past them.
Lots to dissect but the logic used has to be backed up by numbers. If the vaccines are 95% effective as alleged, for 60% of hospitalizations to be among the vaccinated means they are not 95% effective, or, there is very little spread among the unvaccinated.
Hard to reconcile the logic with numbers.
While many unvaccinated are fearful of the long term implications of the jabs, I have the impression the vaccines are weak brew stuff. They may work for a little while, but the ‘immunity’ may fade away relatively quickly. I had seen data suggesting it drops from 95% to 65% in 5 weeks, and if these things confer long term protection why have they been talking about booster shots since even before they were unleashed on the public?
Obviously not effective
I was in the hospital the other day and heard quite a few people were there because of the vaccines. I wish they would pull them being given to anyone of any age.
“The majority of people in hospital with COVID right now have been fully vaccinated.”
So much for the claim that breakthrough infections would be very light or asymptomatic.
The goalposts are getting sore feet.
Misprint. They only guarantee that the jab will be highly affective.
It allows folks to feel safe and smug even if the jab is doing nothing, and in some cases, killing them.
Bkmk
This would be the first path I would start with.
So far the vaccines have been very very effective. In making billions for the manufacturers. They had to replace oxycodone with something. And to make it even better, you can’t sue if you die from the Vax. You could sue from an oxy overdose.
This is the most profitable drug in the history of pharmaceuticals. And it either does nothing or kills you. It doesn’t get better.
Yep, what a deal. No consequences for murder.
A much higher % of the people who are vulnerable to covid have had “the jab”, 90%+ of those over 65, those who would get sick enough to end up in hospital.
What matters is how many of these are actually going to the hospital, or dying. 60% of very few means the stuff is working.
Worldometer has its problems but this is pretty clear - compare deaths vs pre-vaccination waves -
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/uk
He said the UK was quite close to the previous “winter wave” of infections.
“In the winter wave, we were up to around 60,000 people testing positive per day,” he said.
“We are now somewhere on towards 50,000. So we’re quite close to the size of the winter wave of infections and this is going to increase.”
He said the timing of the next peak of the virus would be “uncertain”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.