Naturally, this list will continue to grow unfortunately.
Keeping in mind that these reports are only a fraction of the data out there and only those reports that the praetorian guard media & tech have let out.
Psaki refuses to answer question on WH ‘breakthrough’ Covid cases… (07.23.2021)
‘Why do you need that information?’
Also keeping in mind, that these vaccines are NOT approved and licensed and are only available to the public at large because of Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA). Each of the manufactures were given authorization to "prevent" covid. There is nothing in their EUA's about lessoning hospital stays or deaths. Only, prevention of covid.
Pfizer's EUA:
"the FDA decision is based on the totality of scientific evidence available showing that the product may be effective to prevent COVID-19 during the COVID-19 pandemic and that the known and potential benefits of the product outweigh the known and potential risks of the product. All of these criteria must be met to allow for the product to be used in the treatment of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is in effect for the duration of the COVID-19 EUA declaration justifying emergency use of these products, unless terminated or revoked (after which the products may no longer be used)."
Moderna's EUA: "Having concluded that the criteria for issuance of this authorization under Section 564(c) of the Act are met, I am authorizing the emergency use of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19"
Janssens's EUA: "On February 27, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for emergency use of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 for individuals 18 years of age and older pursuant to Section 564 of the Act."
Both Moderna and Janssen's EUA's are based on preventing covid. Is this what prevention look like? Pfizer's EUA is based on "may" prevent covid. OK, some wiggle room there. If 1 in one hundred million doesn't get covid, but the other 99,999,999 do after taking their experimental shot, they can say...look, our agreement is that it may prevent covid.
These vaccines were given Emergency Authorization to be widely distributed and administered to "prevent" covid.
How many people, especially those that are not elderly or have pre-existing health concerns who have gotten the experimental medicine, would have changed their minds if they knew they had a much higher percentage chance (than being reported by the govt & the manufacturers) of getting covid, that they would have to got back to wearing a piece of cloth over their mouth and nose and be limited to large indoor (& outdoor) events anyway?
Would they take the chance of getting one or more of the reported side effects knowing the above?
Are these error rates acceptable to meet those EUA's and keep these unlicensed vaccines widely available outside a typical controlled study phase?
AFAIC, if science and honesty were the driving force, their EUA's would be revoked.
Thanks for the links.