Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paleontologists Stunning Conclusion: 2.5 Billion T. Rexes Roamed North America Over the Cretaceous Period
SciTechDaily ^ | 4/15/2021 | UC Berkeley

Posted on 04/16/2021 1:18:06 PM PDT by LibWhacker

Paleontologists Stunning Conclusion: 2.5 Billion T. Rexes Roamed North America Over the Cretaceous Period

TOPICS:

By University of California - Berkeley April 15, 2021

Tyrannosaurus T-Rex Dinosaur

Analysis of what’s known about the dinosaur leads to conclusion there were 2.5 billion over time.

How many Tyrannosaurus rexes roamed North America during the Cretaceous period?

That’s a question Charles Marshall pestered his paleontologist colleagues with for years until he finally teamed up with his students to find an answer.

What the team found, to be published this week in the journal Science, is that about 20,000 adult T. rexes probably lived at any one time, give or take a factor of 10, which is in the ballpark of what most of his colleagues guessed.

What few paleontologists had fully grasped, he said, including himself, is that this means that some 2.5 billion lived and died over the approximately 2 1/2 million years the dinosaur walked the earth.

Until now, no one has been able to compute population numbers for long-extinct animals, and George Gaylord Simpson, one of the most influential paleontologists of the last century, felt that it couldn’t be done.

Marshall, director of the University of California Museum of Paleontology, the Philip Sandford Boone Chair in Paleontology and a UC Berkeley professor of integrative biology and of earth and planetary science, was also surprised that such a calculation was possible.

T. rex Cast at UC Berkeley

A cast of a T. rex skeleton on display outside the UC Museum of Paleontology at the University of California, Berkeley. The original, a nearly complete skeleton excavated in 1990 from the badlands of eastern Montana, is at the Museum of the Rockies in Bozeman, Montana. Credit: Keegan Houser, UC Berkeley

“The project just started off as a lark, in a way,” he said. “When I hold a fossil in my hand, I can’t help wondering at the improbability that this very beast was alive millions of years ago, and here I am holding part of its skeleton — it seems so improbable. The question just kept popping into my head, ‘Just how improbable is it? Is it one in a thousand, one in a million, one in a billion?’ And then I began to realize that maybe we can actually estimate how many were alive, and thus, that I could answer that question.”

Marshall is quick to point out that the uncertainties in the estimates are large. While the population of T. rexes was most likely 20,000 adults at any give time, the 95% confidence range — the population range within which there’s a 95% chance that the real number lies — is from 1,300 to 328,000 individuals. Thus, the total number of individuals that existed over the lifetime of the species could have been anywhere from 140 million to 42 billion.

“As Simpson observed, it is very hard to make quantitative estimates with the fossil record,” he said. “In our study, we focused in developing robust constraints on the variables we needed to make our calculations, rather than on focusing on making best estimates, per se.”

He and his team then used Monte Carlo computer simulation to determine how the uncertainties in the data translated into uncertainties in the results.

The greatest uncertainty in these numbers, Marshall said, centers around questions about the exact nature of the dinosaur’s ecology, including how warm-blooded T. rex was. The study relies on data published by John Damuth of UC Santa Barbara that relates body mass to population density for living animals, a relationship known as Damuth’s Law. While the relationship is strong, he said, ecological differences result in large variations in population densities for animals with the same physiology and ecological niche. For example, jaguars and hyenas are about the same size, but hyenas are found in their habitat at a density 50 times greater than the density of jaguars in their habitat.

“Our calculations depend on this relationship for living animals between their body mass and their population density, but the uncertainty in the relationship spans about two orders of magnitude,” Marshall said. “Surprisingly, then, the uncertainty in our estimates is dominated by this ecological variability and not from the uncertainty in the paleontological data we used.”

As part of the calculations, Marshall chose to treat T. rex as a predator with energy requirements halfway between those of a lion and a Komodo dragon, the largest lizard on Earth.

The issue of T. rex’s place in the ecosystem led Marshall and his team to ignore juvenile T. rexes, which are underrepresented in the fossil record and may, in fact, have lived apart from adults and pursued different prey. As T. rex crossed into maturity, its jaws became stronger by an order of magnitude, enabling it to crush bone. This suggests that juveniles and adults ate different prey and were almost like different predator species.

This possibility is supported by a recent study, led by evolutionary biologist Felicia Smith of the University of New Mexico, which hypothesized that the absence of medium-size predators alongside the massive predatory T. rex during the late Cretaceous was because juvenile T. rex filled that ecological niche.

What the fossils tell us

The UC Berkeley scientists mined the scientific literature and the expertise of colleagues for data they used to estimate that the likely age at sexual maturity of a T. rex was 15.5 years; its maximum lifespan was probably into its late 20s; and its average body mass as an adult — its so-called ecological body mass, — was about 5,200 kilograms, or 5.2 tons. They also used data on how quickly T. rexes grew over their life span: They had a growth spurt around sexual maturity and could grow to weigh about 7,000 kilograms, or 7 tons.

From these estimates, they also calculated that each generation lasted about 19 years, and that the average population density was about one dinosaur for every 100 square kilometers.

Then, estimating that the total geographic range of T. rex was about 2.3 million square kilometers, and that the species survived for roughly 2 1/2 million years, they calculated a standing population size of 20,000. Over a total of about 127,000 generations that the species lived, that translates to about 2.5 billion individuals overall.

With such a large number of post-juvenile dinosaurs over the history of the species, not to mention the juveniles that were presumably more numerous, where did all those bones go? What proportion of these individuals have been discovered by paleontologists? To date, fewer than 100 T. rex individuals have been found, many represented by a single fossilized bone.

“There are about 32 relatively well-preserved, post-juvenile T. rexes in public museums today,” he said. “Of all the post-juvenile adults that ever lived, this means we have about one in 80 million of them.”

“If we restrict our analysis of the fossil recovery rate to where T. rex fossils are most common, a portion of the famous Hell Creek Formation in Montana, we estimate we have recovered about one in 16,000 of the T. rexes that lived in that region over that time interval that the rocks were deposited,” he added. “We were surprised by this number; this fossil record has a much higher representation of the living than I first guessed. It could be as good as one in a 1,000, if hardly any lived there, or it could be as low as one in a quarter million, given the uncertainties in the estimated population densities of the beast.”

Marshall expects his colleagues will quibble with many, if not most, of the numbers, but he believes that his calculational framework for estimating extinct populations will stand and be useful for estimating populations of other fossilized creatures.

“In some ways, this has been a paleontological exercise in how much we can know, and how we go about knowing it,” he said. “It’s surprising how much we actually know about these dinosaurs and, from that, how much more we can compute. Our knowledge of T. rex has expanded so greatly in the past few decades thanks to more fossils, more ways of analyzing them and better ways of integrating information over the multiple fossils known.”

The framework, which the researchers have made available as computer code, also lays the foundation for estimating how many species paleontologists might have missed when excavating for fossils, he said.

“With these numbers, we can start to estimate how many short-lived, geographically specialized species we might be missing in the fossil record,” he said. “This may be a way of beginning to quantify what we don’t know.”

Marshall’s co-authors are UC Berkeley undergraduate Connor Wilson and graduate students Daniel Latorre, Tanner Frank, Katherine Magoulick, Joshua Zimmt and Ashley Poust, who is now a postdoctoral fellow at the San Diego Natural History Museum.



TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: america; billions; cretaceous; namerica; rex; rexes; roamed; trex; tyrannosaurus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: LibWhacker

Many of them seemed to be particularly partial to running around in the Chicago area at night (especially on the weekends).

41 posted on 04/16/2021 2:42:22 PM PDT by Songcraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Fake News! ;)

You know how sometimes you wished you lived in simpler times, like maybe the 40’s after the war, or even as a sod-buster on the Prairie, kind of Laura Ingalls Wilder - without the smallpox, bloodthirsty Indians and your sister going blind? ;)

Of all the times to have lived in History, I wonder why nobody wishes they had lived during the Cretaceous period?

*SNORT*


42 posted on 04/16/2021 2:42:53 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
China+India = more than 1/3rd of humans currently alive

(And that circle is about 50% ocean)

43 posted on 04/16/2021 2:48:14 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

If you believe this Paleo-nonsense you couldn’t have thrown a rock back then without hitting a T-Rex.


And if you had thrown a rock at one, the one behind you would have snagged your arm and ...


44 posted on 04/16/2021 3:03:45 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Makes Jurassic Park look like a piker.


45 posted on 04/16/2021 3:05:06 PM PDT by moovova (Yo GOP....we won't forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
about 20,000 adult T. rexes probably lived at any one time, give or take a factor of 10,

So, the real guess is between 2,000 and 200,000. Pretty much a SWAG.

Until now, no one has been able to compute population numbers ... and [someone] felt that it couldn’t be done.

First you take a SWAG, then you learn to multiply, and viola!!!, you're an expert!!! I wonder how much these people get paid for this "science".

46 posted on 04/16/2021 3:05:29 PM PDT by libertylover (Many people who want to destroy us have bumper stickers on their cars that say: "Coexist".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

No, their arms got short as they evolved and became adept at not picking up restaurant tabs.


47 posted on 04/16/2021 3:06:07 PM PDT by sageburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
...T-Rex did not need arms to choke the prey.

Imagine a tiger with stubby little arms. Not much of a tiger now is it? Those big T-Rex jaws were for busting open big bones.

48 posted on 04/16/2021 3:14:49 PM PDT by Nateman (Keep Liberty Alive! Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

That means there had to be at least 9 Trillion animals of prey just for their palate!!
(2.5b x 365 days)


49 posted on 04/16/2021 3:17:41 PM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odawg

Dead dinosaurs have awfully big bones with lots of tasty stuff inside just waiting to get eaten. Big powerful jaws made those bones into good eating .


50 posted on 04/16/2021 3:20:24 PM PDT by Nateman (Keep Liberty Alive! Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cweese

Tons of chickens.


51 posted on 04/16/2021 3:31:38 PM PDT by Levy78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Proof:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h59lUTbuE1I


52 posted on 04/16/2021 3:40:50 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Poor kids are just as bright, just as talented, as white kids." - Joe Biden Aug 8, 2019)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

“Dead dinosaurs have awfully big bones with lots of tasty stuff inside just waiting to get eaten. Big powerful jaws made those bones into good eating,”

You have it backwards. The flesh of dinosaurs was on the outside and the bones were the supporting frames with only the guts inside the ribs. Much more flesh than bones.


53 posted on 04/16/2021 3:42:21 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; al baby

80,000,000 years, 2,500,000,000 critters, an average of 31.25 critter per year, spread over all of the US and Canada?

Call it 7.7 million square miles.

Each T Rex has roughly a quarter million square miles to roam.

I’m stuned...


54 posted on 04/16/2021 3:43:13 PM PDT by null and void (The media decides what news you can see and NOT SEE. But don't you dare call 'em Not-Sees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cp124

Bingo!


55 posted on 04/16/2021 3:46:34 PM PDT by null and void (The media decides what news you can see and NOT SEE. But don't you dare call 'em Not-Sees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317

Amazing pictorial statement!


56 posted on 04/16/2021 3:57:13 PM PDT by entropy12 (Thanks President Trump for WARP SPEED availability of covid vaccines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: odawg
Much more flesh than bones.

For a scavenger bones are the thing because the rest has usually been picked over.

57 posted on 04/16/2021 4:01:20 PM PDT by Nateman (Keep Liberty Alive! Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

Front paws of the tiger is always his first strike at the pray. It is never the bite, first. So tiger needs strong front legs.

T-Rex on the other hand had those enormously big hind legs. My guess is he could run on 2 hind legs something like a kangaroo, and when he caught up with the pray, one bite of that long jaw with 6” long sabre teeth would instantly kill the pray.

A scavenger has no need for such long and strong hind legs. A hyena is the premier scavenger in Africa and looks more like a dog than T-Rex.


58 posted on 04/16/2021 4:02:54 PM PDT by entropy12 (Thanks President Trump for WARP SPEED availability of covid vaccines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
Imagine a tiger with stubby little arms. Not much of a tiger now is it? Those big T-Rex jaws were for busting open big bones.

There's no evidence that forelimbs are needed to be an efficient predator. Snakes bring down prey just fine without them, and predators from wolves to weasels bring down their prey with their teeth and jaws. Cats with their retractable claws do make full use of their forelimbs in subduing prey, but it's hardly a requirement for a predator.

I'd guess T-Rex was (like most carnivores) both a predator and a scavenger, depending on what was available. No carnivore is going to choose to try to subdue living prey when a dead carcass is available.
59 posted on 04/16/2021 4:40:41 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: odawg

Eagles aren’t scavengers and they don’t have arms. There were herds of short legged, fat gravers that were popping out of clutches of 50 eggs at a time and with double the foliage density of today (CO2 was over 2X) and 50% more oxygen, the plant eaters grew muscle fast.


60 posted on 04/16/2021 6:10:16 PM PDT by UNGN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson