|
Posted on 12/06/2020 10:28:58 AM PST by ransomnote
(h/t John4.11)
"
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3913174/posts?page=1
Ilhan Omar’s husband received $635k in Covid-19 bailout money for his consulting firm, despite congresswoman paying his company a staggering $2.25M this year alone
Daily Mail ^ | 12-7-20 | Cheyenne Roundtree
According to retired Israeli general and current professor Haim Eshed, the answer is yes, but this has been kept a secret because “humanity isn’t ready.”
He's a filthy LIAR!!
PS thanks for including the drop numbers, though. I'd been looking for Q on the subject as someone intimated that after the failure of everything else, "Aliens" would be used to scare people.
EPIC!
ransomnote wrote:
“
“Thank you, O MQD. Enough said... by me, at least.
Deep breath.
WWG1WGA
WWG1WGA
WWG1WGA...”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It’s gonna be a great week. Texokie is rumored to be on tap to tickle the ivories in the Qanteen on Wedesday, Bagster’s up for open mic night on Thursday, Foldspace is having an art showing on Friday.
There are still gaps. We got gaps. But the week is filling in fast.... :)
“
And the Highlander is standing watch on the Qanteen wall...
Mee too and When I didnt like Shrub anymore he became
El Jorge Boosh
Well said
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3913026/posts?page=1
No, The Georgia Vote-Counting Video Was Not ‘Debunked.’ Not Even Close
The Federalist ^ | December 7, 2020 | Mollie Hemmingway
“Just to give proper credit, MNDude originally posted the article on this thread . He didn’t have a link so I asked him if it was that same article my husband had told me about a day or so ago, and he confirmed it was the same and I then posted the link.”
Sorry. My bad
* MAGA * MANDATE PENAL-TY GONE * TARIFFS VS. COMMUNISTS * FACTORIES US SOIL * BUTLER PA * II AMENDMENT * PRIVATE PROPERTY
“Get obligated to us again, start by this needle, or else “
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3912771/posts?page=1218#1218
see the links re: Ron’s tweet - he was watching Tucker
Really, I was only responding to him calling me a troll.
I make a formal PUBLIC apology to EVERYONE I may have offended.
I really thought I was just asking innocent questions when he called me a troll. I did not mean to offend anyone. I took it personal and offensive when he called me a troll. Should have ignored.
Yep, start a half minute before that time and listen to the hostess comment after, parallels what Powell has been eluding to. And discusses the polls starting about 1:03:30.
Maybe this will cheer you up. Lots of graphics and stuff at the link:
War Nuse
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1220488754332340225.html
Transcribed Exchange Between Lindsey Graham And Brett Kavanaugh From The Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearing.
This Exchange Will Be KEY In The Coming Years Of Revelations, Prosecutions, And Executions.
Graham: “So, When Somebody Says Post 9/11, That We’ve Been At War, And It’s Called ‘The War On Terrorism’. Do You Generally Agree With That Concept?”
Kavanaugh: “I Do, Senator, Because Congress Passed ‘The Authorization For Use Of Military Force’ Which Is Still In Effect, And That Was Passed, Of Course, On September 14th, 2001, Three Days Later.”
Graham: “Let’s Talk About The Law In War. Is There A Body Of Law Called ‘The Law Of Armed Conflict’?”
Kavanaugh: “There Is Such A Body, Senator.”
Graham: “Is There A Body Of That’s Law Called ‘Basic Criminal Law’?”
Kavanaugh: “Yes, Senator.”
Graham: “Are There Differences Between Those Two Bodies Of Law?”
Kavanaugh: “Yes, Senator.”
Graham: “From An American Citizen’s Point Of View, Do Your Constitutional Rights Follow You, If You’re In Paris, Does The 4th Amendment Protect You, As An American, From Your Own Government?”
Kavanaugh: “From Your Own Government, Yes.”
Graham: “Okay. So, If You’re In Afghanistan, Do Your Constitutional Rights Protect You Against Your Own Government?”
Kavanaugh: “If You’re An American In Afghanistan You Have Constitutional Rights As Against The U.S. Government.”
Graham: “Is There A Long Standing…”
Kavanaugh: “…That’s, That’s Long Settled Law.”
Graham: “Isn’t There Also Long Settled Law That, It Goes Back To Isenstrator Case, I Can’t Remember The Name Of It.”
Kavanaugh: “Johnson v. Eisentrager.”
Graham: “Right. That American Citizens Who Collaborate With The Enemy Are Considered ‘Enemy Combatants’?”
Kavanaugh: “They Can Be.”
Graham: “They Can Be?”
Kavanaugh: “They Can Be. They’re Often, Some, They’re Sometimes Criminally Prosecuted, Sometimes Treated In The Military System.”
Graham: “Let’s Talk About ‘Can Be’. I Think The…”
Kavanaugh: “…Under Supreme Court Precedent.”
Graham: “Right. There’s A Supreme Court Decision That Said, That American Citizens Who Collaborated With Nazi Saboteurs Were Tried By The Military. Is That Correct?”
Kavanaugh: “That Is Correct.”
Graham: “I Think A Couple Of Them Were Executed?”
Kavanaugh: “Yeah.”
Graham: “So, If Anybody Doubts There Is A Long Standing History In This Country, That Your Constitutional Rights Follow You Were Ever You Go, But You Don’t Have A Constitutional Right To Turn On Your Own Government, Collaborate With The Enemy Of The Nation...”
Graham: (Con’t) “...You’ll Be Treated Differently. What’s The Name Of The Case, If You Can Recall, That Reaffirmed The Concept That You Could Hold One Of Our Own As An ‘Enemy Combatant’ If They Were Engaged In Terrorist Activities In Afghanistan? Are You Familiar With That Case?”
Kavanaugh: “Yeah. Hamdi.”
Graham: “Okay, So The Bottom Line Is, I Want Every American Citizen To Know You Have Constitutional Rights, But You Do Not Have A Constitutional Right To Collaborate With The Enemy...”
Graham: (Con’t) “...There’s A Body Of Law Well Developed Long Before 9/11, That Understood The Difference Between ‘Basic Criminal Law’, And ‘The Law Of Armed Conflict’. Do You Understand Those Differences?”
Kavanaugh: “I Do Understand They Are Different Bodies Of Law, Of Course, Senator.”
(End Transcription)
During The Exchange Above Between Graham And Kavanaugh Two U.S. Supreme Court Decisions Were Referenced.
The First Was ‘Johnson v. Eisentrager’.
‘The Germans Argued That Their Courts-Martial Violated Their Fifth Amendment Due-Process Rights.’
Explaining Eisentrager | National Review
As the Supreme Court considers whether the U.S. Constitution protects the prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay–it hears oral arguments today in the case–the central issue is the meaning of a case involvi…
https://www.nationalreview.com/2004/04/explaining-eisentrager-dave-kopel/
The Second Was ‘Hamdi v. Rumsfeld.’
‘Does The Constitution Grant An American Citizen Held In The United States As An Enemy Combatant The Due Process Right To Challenge The Factual Basis For His Detention Before An Impartial Decisionmaker?’
casebriefs.com/blog/law/const…
‘Charter Of The International Military Tribunal.’
‘18 U.S. Code Chapter 115.’
‘Unlike Other Human Rights Violations, War Crimes Do Not Engage State Responsibility But Individual Criminal Responsibility. This Means That Individuals Can Be Tried And Found Personally Responsible For These Crimes.’
‘The Death Penalty - U.S. Government Vs. U.S. Military.’
No Hangings, No Execution Squads, Lethal Injection Is The Sole Method.
Pain Coming?
Definitely.
I Cannot Emphasize Enough The Significance Of This Exchange Between Graham And Kavanaugh From Kavanaugh’s Confirmation Hearing.
The Entire Exchange Transcribed And In Screenshots.
Did The Guantánamo Upgrades Include A Lethal Injection Execution Chamber? A [Black Hat] Graveyard?
With The New Facilities And Increased Troop Deployments, Guantánamo Is Prepped And Ready For Military Tribunals, Sentencing, And Long Term Incarcerations.
BOOM!
Some people donate ANONymously. ...
However, Kalam is a good, longtime FReeQ and doesn’t deserve to be investigated or outed. That’s just not cool. We like unity, not division.
It is not surprising that you’ve ruffled feathers since you are new to the thread and feel the need to pass judgment on us. Some of our best posters are people like you, who had questions, and took the time to read Q’s drops and our posts for a while, before forming an opinion of us. ...
_______________________________________________________________
Melian, I am a monthly donor. Here I see an individual that will stoop to any lenghts to try and justify his actions, in this case his original comments, by attacking
and trying to demean others.
That is not the kind of person who will stick around here. We believe the acrynom WWG1WGA. That is a foreign concept to trolls, even those who hold some conservative positions.
No, in my opinion, this troll won’t be around long.
BOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!
bitt wrote:
“EXCELLENT TUCKER SHOW TONIGHT - CHINA!!
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6214785667001 3 MIN
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6214783970001 4 MIN
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6214769762001 9 MIN
“
ThankQ, bitt; ties in with your post:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3912771/posts?page=1161#1161
Buckle up; I see a storm on the horizon...
I wonder what Kemp (and no doubt he’s not the only person in GA in on this) going to do? He strikes me as the type who would commit suicide rather than face justice. Face justice he will.
As far as anyone contributing anonymously, that is commendable too. I was looking for constructive ways to handle the situation.
Start by reading all 4,952 Q posts in order.
***************************************************************************************
Constructive? snort-spit. Not what it looked like to me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.