Why they can't understand that never ceases to amaze me. I think their mockery is knowingly fake and intended for the sheep audience. Hell, I don't think it, I know it. Who am I fooling.
Posted on 05/12/2020 6:29:57 PM PDT by ransomnote
>>He would not have branded it “ObamaGate” if he didn’t have the goods.
>>Absolutely. He’s not stupid enough to say something like that without knowing it to be true. He hasn’t yet and never will.
Reminds me strongly of early in his Presidency when Trump said he was being wiretapped. MSM/libs mocked him. Intensely.
First they ignore you,
then they laugh at you,
then they fight you,
then you win.
RR trying to save his own bacon
Why they can't understand that never ceases to amaze me. I think their mockery is knowingly fake and intended for the sheep audience. Hell, I don't think it, I know it. Who am I fooling.
>> For me day one was 1988.
GHWB election?
You can only appeal a “final and appealable order” which means the case must be completely disposed of on the record. Powell can seek injunctive relief before a final order on a showig of irreparable harm, without any other relief available. And that standard may be met here. T’were I Powell I would certainly apply for that today. That relief is an injunction, stopping Sullivan. Powell needs to show, and the appeals judge(only one is needed) that rerepable harm may resukt, no other relief is available and that the appealant has a good chance of prevailing on appeal.
Powell can chose which appeals judge to submit that motion to, thats critical. Trump has a couple decent judges on that panel.
I just had a thought.
I know Obama is total derp enemy of America and a puppet of higher authority.
But do we make a mistake when we separate out all the dirty players, like Comey, Brennan, Lynch, Clapper, Hillary, and the rest? This is a case of ALL THE PRESIDENT'S MEN AND LESBIANS (look for the book and film adaptation). He is ultimately responsible for the acts of his administration. He knew or should have known what dirt they were dealing. And he should pay the price.
This 'what did he know and when did he know it' stuff is a vestige from Watergate and a stupid cliché.
And there are WAY too many rogue elements working in a coordinated effort with even foreign governments to not be placed upon the magic negroe's table.
Anyway, I guess that's just philosophy and not the law.
Try this site for An Appeal to Heaven flag:
They sell several Annin made in the USA flags on their website. They also do have some cheaper lines. Just read the descriptions.
He would not have branded it “ObamaGate” if he didn’t have
the goods.
~~~~~~~~~~
“Absolutely. He’s not stupid enough to say something like
that without knowing it to be true. He hasn’t yet and never
will.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Allow me to pic a tiny nit,
because I tried to be precise in what I said.
It’s not what he knows.
It is what he has the goods to prove.
I’m certain he believed it all along.
Now that he WILL prove it,
is when he moves to brand it.
I’ve been waiting for our President to brand Obamagate,
because I’ve always seen it as being the final sign that
“We” really DO have it all.
But that’s just me.
;-)
~Easy
I’m not sure if I understand your point.
Are you saying we should ignore the other players and go for 0vomit?
I say we go after EVERY LAST ONE of the criminals. Top to bottom.
Not just you, my brother from another mother.
For him to KNOW something to be true, he must needs 'have the goods'.
Just like last week or so when he talked at the rona press conference about uv light being introduced to the lungs to cure the rona. Oh, they laughed and laughed. Then they round out it was really a thing.
He obviously had already been told or read about it. And EVERY time he talks smack on his opponents or other countries, same thing. He's got the goods. His bold statements, seemingly far fetched, are ALWAYS based on substantive knowledge. A knowing of the truth.
The press, derps, and the people will ALWAYS find that to be the case. But in the meantime, they log it into the eighty million times Trump lied and the derpish sheeps eat it up.
Obamagate is here to stay, thanks to the branding genius of Donald Trump and despite the fervid cover up attempts of the enemy Google.
These derps just can't deal with Trump.
“One theory that makes sense to me is that they were NOT
unmasking Flynn. Flynn was the “legit” target and they were
unmasking everyone that Flynn talked to. Presumably Trump,
for starters.”
That’s the same way I see it.
The only thing I’ll add is that I don’t think Flynn was the
only target that they could unmask everybody two hops away
from.
I’m betting they had more than one.
I’m not certain we’ll learn about them all, though.
~Easy
They SET HIM UP TO MAKE THE PHONE CALL.
Troll status UTTERLY *confirmed*.
I believe I speak for most on this thread when I reply "Sod off, Swampy."
You lying swine.
Lynn’s plea deal referenced his “advice of counsel”.
His counsel as engaged in misconduct when they advised him to sign.
Perjury promise in plea is nullified.
His counsel was the one who committed perjury.
I'm saying that, rather than look at each individual scumbag as if they can be walled off from the total conspiracy, we look at them in the conglomerate. Guilty from the top down as we know them to be.
And that, even if we don't have actual evidence (we do) of Obama's guilt, know that he is guilty too, him being the HNIC and whatnot.
That's how they would do it in days of yore, and how we should do it now. There is no such thing as an innocent President when ALL of his minions are guilty.
And....we do tend to think of Hillary as being singular in her scumbaggery. We tend to forget that she worked for Obama. He bears her formidable weight too.
I love that meme. LL’s eyes and ears remind me of Ovomit. Wonder if there is some relationship.
and then my mind wanders over to this NYT article from Nov 9, 2016: WASHINGTON — "President Obama is considering removing Adm. Michael S. Rogers from his posts as leader of the National Security Agency and United States Cyber Command after top officials expressed frustration over the speed at which Admiral Rogers had moved to combat the Islamic State and over the agency’s repeated loss of closely guarded secrets, administration and intelligence officials said Saturday."
Now if o'bungle was so concerned about this issue why would he remove General Flynn he was doing TOO much? So that is obviously a phoney reason. The meeting with Adm. Rogers and POTUS comes into play.
It goes back to United States vs Reynolds and US codes 10 and 50 and Military-Intelligence convergence and the law of the Title 10/Title 50 debate. But clearly the C_A (no thank you shrubs) usurped military authority. That will be fixed.
And though the covid thing was meant to harm, it actually plays in more conveniently because unlike the early part of the admin. now the mil is already in place to
Or the election of the C_A as I put it.
Yup, we are on the same page.
~Easy
Yup...
I’d just add a word.
RICO
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.