[bagster]

He would not have branded it “ObamaGate” if he didn’t have the goods.

I just had a thought.

I know Obama is total derp enemy of America and a puppet of higher authority.

But do we make a mistake when we separate out all the dirty players, like Comey, Brennan, Lynch, Clapper, Hillary, and the rest? This is a case of ALL THE PRESIDENT'S MEN AND LESBIANS (look for the book and film adaptation). He is ultimately responsible for the acts of his administration. He knew or should have known what dirt they were dealing. And he should pay the price.

This 'what did he know and when did he know it' stuff is a vestige from Watergate and a stupid cliché.

And there are WAY too many rogue elements working in a coordinated effort with even foreign governments to not be placed upon the magic negroe's table.

Anyway, I guess that's just philosophy and not the law.

[generally]

I’m not sure if I understand your point.

Are you saying we should ignore the other players and go for 0vomit?

I say we go after EVERY LAST ONE of the criminals. Top to bottom.

[WaltStuart]

Good points.

I do think, personally, that HRC & O’Bummer are chief evil puppets. They are saturated to the bone with horrific, long chosen levels of evil.

I was surprised recently to read a description of OBummer as being the most evil person someone had ever met—or something to that effect. They seemed to be describing a level of evil that was still largely hidden from the public—even from those who know him to be horribly evil.

I easily believe it. His and HRC’s eyes in certain pictures speak of deep rooted, intense, horrific evil long chosen, wallowed in, walked in, exalted in.