|
Posted on 03/11/2019 2:24:20 PM PDT by ransomnote
Q is part of the plan that resulted from the sacrifices and commitment of patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State, and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in his campaign video.
"....Q is a military intelligence team in the Trump administration.... They are opening up a backchannel with the public, bypassing the compromised mass media...Whilst the media’s role is supposed to be to hold power to account, it has instead become a way for those in power to control the public narrative — in a coordinated fashion....The mass media now manufactures distractions and deceptions, being an agent of a vilely corrupt establishment."
"Fixing this psychologically abusive system of social control is where Q comes in...." ~ Martin Geddes read more
The Q movement is an unprecedited means of communicating with the public in order to prepare us for the dismantling of the Deep State heavily embedded throughout our government, often at the highest levels, and always on both sides of the aisle.
Q relays information about our country, the information war, and the big changes that are coming in "Q drops" or posts which can be found here in their original format.
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. To read summaries of Q drops discussioned on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which includes helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content. The latest Q drops posted on our threads can be located via this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent answers to the all important question, "Which side is Q on?" Another excellent source for identifying President Trump's involvement in Q is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, we are reminded one again that patriotism has no skin color or political party. In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will be very difficult to face, but we will face it together and our country will be forever made stronger for it.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in this article are included in a resource table in Post #1 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
Another interesting and possible decode. Thanks for posting that. What a movie!!!
That said, I send POTUS (may re-election be upon him) my availability update every month...just in case.
“Article 3.
“Section 3.
.................
Quick Links: FAQ Topics Forums Documents Timeline Kids Vermont Constitution Map Citation
U.S. Constitution - Article 3 Section 3
Article 3 - The Judicial Branch
Section 3 - Treason
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
https://www.usconstitution.net/xconst_A3Sec3.html
Article III Section 3 defines treason, and says it requires 2 witnesses to the same overt act or a confession in open court. Hence the two listeners. Will ValJar be given the chance to turn on Omoeba? Or, (speculative), used as proof of his non-citizenship and the full participatory knowledge of Dem leadership?
Q
DiChi questioning another witness on Military Tribunals & she sounds worried: https://mobile.twitter.com/MrX_U812/status/1105844466903117824
ping to my list for post 1244
I thought this was important enough to ping.
We knew this was happening. But I, for one, didn’t know a lot of the details.
Perp walks. Soon!
p.s. Maybe the reason that the Q team has a backup plan for comms (Emergency Alert System) is because there will be so few “journalists” and “newscasters” left after the perp walks start. Think about all those empty news studios and newspaper offices! What a beautiful thought!
That was the read at the time. [VJ] is tied to Awan through “Q” posts as well. But the call with [AS] is what prompted the treason post at the time and must have drove [VJ] and [AS] crazy that they’d been tapped!
That makes MUCH more sense. Thanks.
Now that you bring that up, I can see her on the “defense team” for a LOT of DS players. ;-)
How does that work, when your lawyer is also indicted?
Stocking up on popcorn.
VJ phone call w/ AS.
42m 13s.
[2 listeners - no IDEN].
[1
]_reroutes_[9 random]
[1
]_reroutes_[2 random]
Article 3.
Section 3.
Q
+++++++++++++++++++++++
9+1+2 = 12
Who is maintaining the complete list of FReeQ slides? At The Party, we wouldn't want to leave any out.
:: or in adhering to their Enemies ::
Note 1: ^adhering^ not to be confused with ^citizen or resident^ of
Note 2: Under current congressional declarations of war...who are our enemies?
On the road from Gladwin to Cadillac there is a WWG1WGA sign. It has been up for 8 months. Next time I pass it I will get a photo and post it here. Makes me smile to know I have a friend up that way.
Recusal for conflict of interest is a matter of lawyer ethics, not a regulation.
It is up to the judge to remove the defense attorney. IE, draws out the proceedings.
The EO, effective Jan 1, 2019, allows for Civilian counsel of those subject to tribunal (LOAC).
Not sold on Cheney.
Great and long article with Hanson ripping to shreds the never-Trumper’s idiotic review of Hanson’s new book
https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/03/bulwark-review-the-case-for-trump-response/
Never What?
By Victor Davis Hanson
FTA:
I wrote a book, The Case for Trump, in an effort — as an outsider who has no career investment in Trump and has never met him or visited the Trump White House — to analyze how and why Donald J. Trump was elected president and why his agenda so far has been successful. One Gabriel Schoenfeld has just published a hysterical attack on that effort in the Bill Kristol–Charles Sykes new Bulwark, and it is emblematic of that venue’s promised Never Trump ad hominem assault on individual supporters of the president.
...
Willful Blindness
But where Schoenfeld, the supposed scholar of intelligence operations, becomes incoherent is in his surprising ignorance about the overreach of the administrative state in general, and, in particular, the role of the Steele dossier in ginning up Russian-collusion hysteria:
...
There is unfortunately a lot of ignorance in just those three silly paragraphs.
What exactly was the intent of the serial lawsuits challenging voting machines immediately following the election, the initial articles of impeachment, the efforts to subvert the Electoral College voting, the desperate efforts to invoke the emoluments clause, the 25th Amendment, and the ossified Logan Act, followed by the Mueller investigation, the tragicomic McCabe-Rosenstein palace coup, and the dozens of present House investigations — if not to abort a presidency by means other than an election?
Rarely have such intentions been so shamelessly stated as in the September 5, 2018, New York Times op-ed by “Anonymous”— timed to coincide with the release of Bob Woodward’s latest insider account, this one of the supposedly imploding Trump White House. The unnamed Trump-administration official boasted that he and his patriotic #Resistance confederates were deep within the Trump administration and were stealthily using their bureaucratic powers to nullify any presidential efforts that they in their superior wisdom and morality found disagreeable. (“It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room,” Anonymous reassured readers.) According to the unelected and disgraced former FBI director Andrew McCabe’s own admission, both he and DOJ deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein discussed — to the point of Rosenstein contemplating wearing a wire — the possible 25th Amendment mechanisms under which they might remove an elected president. The zealous careerist McCabe also tells us that he had to send his FBI minions after Attorney General Jeff Sessions — again for the good of us all.
Why did DOJ and FBI officials seek surveillance on American citizens without fully apprising a FISA court that the basis for such requests was an unverified dossier, compiled by a retired foreign national, who purchased unverified Russian sources, who himself had been fired from the FBI as a consultant, who was paid by the Clinton campaign, albeit stealthily through two firewalls, and who was the circular source for news accounts used to substantiate the dossier?
What business does the FBI have communicating with an informant prying into an ongoing presidential campaign? Why exactly did U.N. ambassador Samantha Power, mostly in her last year in office, make more than 260 requests to unmask the names of American citizens surveilled by the U.S. government (some of them mysteriously leaked) and then claim, under oath, that she, in fact, did not herself make those requests but that someone (unidentified) made them “in her name”? There is a reason, although ignored by Schoenfeld, that more than 20 FBI and DOJ officials have been fired, reassigned, demoted, retired, or resigned. And there is a reason that, on 245 occasions, the former director of the FBI claimed under oath to Congress that he either couldn’t remember or did not know the answers to congressional questions. Try that tactic sometime with an IRS auditor.
...
Crap man, all crude jokes aside that a difficult picture to see. Once seen cannot be unseen.
:: who himself had been fired from the FBI as a consultant ::
We’ve all come to believe that this was “cover action”, right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
