Q Anon: 07/29/18 "Trust The Plan"

Thanks for the admonition to pray for ALL who are at the levers of power, and especially Senator McConnell.

2,201 posted on 08/01/2018 4:43:05 PM PDT by TEXOKIE

Take a look, in case it’s interesting.
http://www.wysiwygwebbuilder.com/links.html

2,202 posted on 08/01/2018 4:47:08 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)

Along with important papers, please take pictures in each room of all your possessions. One of the hardest things from the Santa Rosa fire people said was trying to remember everything to list for insurance reimbursement.

Prayers and best wishes for you and for all in harm's way.

2,203 posted on 08/01/2018 4:49:33 PM PDT by pbear8 (the Lord is my light and my salvation)

To: No_Doll_i; TEXOKIE; bagster; Steven W.

October 19, 2016 Then-candidate Hillary Clinton stated: "We have 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military, who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyberattacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin, and they are designed to influence our election."

“We have 17, 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyber attacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin. And they are designed to influence our election. I find that deeply disturbing,” Clinton said during Wednesday's presidential debate in Las Vegas.

________________________________________________________

July 6, 2017 President Donald Trump, speaking in Poland downplayed the strength of the intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia meddled in the election to his benefit.

He justified his doubt by noting that the New York Times and the Associated Press recently corrected stories to clarify that four agencies, rather than 17, were directly involved in the January intelligence assessment about Russia’s interference in the election.

"I heard it was 17 agencies. I said, boy, that’s a lot. Do we even have that many intelligence agencies? Right, let’s check that," Trump told NBC’s Hallie Jackson. "We did some heavy research. It turned out to be three or four. It wasn’t 17. ... I agree, I think it was Russia, but I think it was probably other people and/or countries, and I see nothing wrong with that statement. Nobody really knows. Nobody really knows for sure."

________________________________________________________

OCTOBER 28, 2017 "QANON" IS BORN ON 4CH

________________________________________________________

POLITIFACT

17 intelligence organizations or 4? Either way, Russia conclusion still valid

By Lauren Carroll on Thursday, July 6th, 2017 at 4:26 p.m.

President Donald Trump, during a visit to Poland, said he believes Russia may have interfered with the US election, along with other countries. (AP/July 6, 2017)

President Donald Trump, speaking in Poland July 6, downplayed the strength of the intelligence community’s conclusion that Russia meddled in the election to his benefit.

It’s valid for Trump to criticize news organizations for not being specific enough in their reports (more on that in a bit). But this does not invalidate the report by the CIA, FBI, NSA and Director of National Intelligence, nor their "high confidence" in their judgment that Russia engaged in an influence campaign directed at the election.

Relevance over quantity

Trump asked if the federal government really does have 17 intelligence organizations. Yes, it does.

They are as follows: Air Force Intelligence, Army Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency, Coast Guard Intelligence, Defense Intelligence Agency, Energy Department, Homeland Security Department, State Department, Treasury Department, Drug Enforcement Administration, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Marine Corps Intelligence, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, National Reconnaissance Office, National Security Agency, Navy Intelligence and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

Some of these are large, independent agencies, like the FBI, CIA and NSA. Others are smaller offices within agencies whose main focus is not intelligence, like the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research or the Treasury’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis.

Four out of the 17 were involved in the January assessment about Russia: CIA, FBI, NSA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which is an umbrella agency that oversees all 17 organizations.

This doesn’t mean the remaining 13 intelligence organizations disagree with the January assessment, nor does it mean the report was insufficient, according to multiple national security experts.

The 17 organizations differ on their missions and scope, so they wouldn’t all be expected to contribute to every intelligence assessment, including one of this import.

"What matters is the agencies that (were involved) and whether, based on their mandate and collection responsibilities, those are the agencies best positioned to make the assessment," said Carrie Cordero, counsel at law firm ZwillGen and former counsel for various federal agencies focusing on national security.

For example, the intelligence arms of the Drug Enforcement Agency or the Coast Guard would not be expected to collect intelligence related to Russian interference in an election, said Steven Aftergood, director of the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists.

"So their endorsement or non-endorsement basically means nothing in this case," Aftergood said, adding, "In this context, the assessments that count the most are those of CIA, NSA, FBI and ODNI."

The intelligence community likely limited the Russia assessment to those four agencies because they have the most to contribute on this topic, and because they wanted to contain the highly sensitive intelligence as much as possible, said Paul Pillar, senior fellow at Georgetown University’s Center for Security Studies who served in the intelligence community for 28 years.

"The ones that participated are the ones you’d expect on this," Pillar said. "It’s hard to see any of the others having something to contribute."

"That does not vitiate the conclusions. It does not mean the jury is still out," he added.

Assessing our October rating

Back in October 2016, we rated this statement by then-candidate Hillary Clinton as True: "We have 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military, who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyberattacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin, and they are designed to influence our election."

Many readers have asked us about this rating since the New York Times and Associated Press issued their corrections.

Our article referred to an Oct. 7, 2016, joint statement from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Homeland Security that presented a preliminary conclusion about Russia’s involvement in the election.

We noted then that the 17 separate agencies did not independently declare Russia the perpetrator behind the hacks; however, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence speaks on behalf of the group.

We asked experts again this week if Clinton’s claim was correct or not.

"In the context of a national debate, her answer was a reasonable inference from the DNI statement," Cordero said, emphasizing that the statement said, "The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident" in its assessment.

Aftergood said it’s fair to say the Director of National Intelligence speaks for the intelligence community, but that doesn’t always mean there is unamity across the community, and it’s possible that some organizations disagree.

But in the case of the Russia investigation, there is no evidence of disagreement among members of the intelligence community.

________________________________________________________ https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/jul/06/17-intelligence-organizations-or-four-either-way-r/

2,204 posted on 08/01/2018 4:49:57 PM PDT by Cats Pajamas (Freedom or Liberty? Which would you choose?)

I’d seen 3-2-1 but I like the idea that there are more court docs than the one I’ve seen; note “Q” never reposted anybody’s finding of that like in other cases

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BfveNoXdzg

Inside Edition: Why Was the Letter ‘Q’ Everywhere at President Trump’s Florida Rally?

2,205 posted on 08/01/2018 4:50:17 PM PDT by Steven W.

To: Snowybear; No_Doll_i; little jeremiah; Melian

Thank you for your prayers! That was exciting, fire burned by about 1/2 mile, thank God for a wind change and the CDF. Could hear the flames rushing when a digger pine stand would go up, probably close to 100 feet up at times. 2 MD-87 air tankers saved the day painting orange stripes of retardant which knocked the fire down quick. Prayers up for those neighbors whose property was affected, don't know if any structures were burned although it looked like it. This was the Bumper Fire and looks likes it's pretty well contained. Also had another fire north of here in Pilot Hill at the same time - Omega Fire. Could have been a lot worse...

Coincidentally 2 days after this:

1762

30-Jul-2018 09:11:43 PDT

Q !CbboFOtcZs

8ch/qresearch 2355012

Copy link


What happens when CA is in serious debt and lost priority 
aid from the FED gov due to sanctuary status (illegal)?
Light fires.
Declare State of Emergency and req billions from FED.
Why did POTUS reject in the past?
Sick people!
The more you know.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/
justice-dept-sues-california-over-sanctuary-laws-that-aid-those-in-us-illegally/2018/03/06/
fd489c2e-215c-11e8-94da-ebf9d112159c_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.a09a30d0059a
https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasdelbeccaro/2018/04/19/
the-top-four-reasons-california-is-unsustainable/#e3dfc913a239
https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-california-wildfire-funds-20171119-story.html
Q

2,206 posted on 08/01/2018 4:54:38 PM PDT by eldoradude (Try believing your lying eyes for a change...)

Thank you, prayers successful!

Can't repeat that often enough, and keep them current!

2,207 posted on 08/01/2018 4:59:09 PM PDT by eldoradude (Try believing your lying eyes for a change...)

To: edzo4; JockoManning; No_Doll_i

The HTML sandbox may be of some use.

2,208 posted on 08/01/2018 5:11:40 PM PDT by pa_dweller (They never thought she would lose. BWAAAAHAAAHAAHAAaa!)

To: LiveFreeOrDie2001

Love the responses to Acosta’s tweet.

2,209 posted on 08/01/2018 5:11:46 PM PDT by Bigg Red (The USA news industry, the MSM-13, takes a machete to the truth. {h/t TigersEye})

We weren’t supposed to ‘Watch CA’ in this timeframe ;)

2,210 posted on 08/01/2018 5:14:01 PM PDT by txhurl (World War Q..... next stop: ....what IS the next stop? Carter's Iran.)

2,211 posted on 08/01/2018 5:22:59 PM PDT by Bigg Red (The USA news industry, the MSM-13, takes a machete to the truth. {h/t TigersEye})

Wait, your son is getting married and you’re not there? Congrats on the new daughter! Is she a good sammich maker? Will he bring her home to cook for you cos I sure as hell am not makin’ your sammiches! You like too much peanut butter!

2,212 posted on 08/01/2018 5:28:02 PM PDT by blu (WWG1WGA)

Oh, and don’t make me use my accessories. You may call me Mimi, but calling me Grannie or Grandma is a “stand in the corner for 15 minutes” offense, that’s how I trained my grandkids.

2,213 posted on 08/01/2018 5:29:11 PM PDT by blu (WWG1WGA)

Also on freerepublic. many there talking about Q, lots of discourse.

You mean it's not radioactive outside the dome anymore? The legends are real?

2,214 posted on 08/01/2018 5:29:12 PM PDT by Disestablishmentarian (Read "American Betrayal" by Diana West)

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

walnut is a code word and do are cheese pizza and pasta.

Your post falls very flat.

2,215 posted on 08/01/2018 5:44:36 PM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Oh- and pesto sauce has pine nuts, not walnuts, as you assert.

2,216 posted on 08/01/2018 5:46:56 PM PDT by Triple (Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)

To: grey_whiskers

Hmmmm that looks like it will be useful.

Thank Q so much!!

2,217 posted on 08/01/2018 5:51:33 PM PDT by No_Doll_i

To: Disestablishmentarian

I would not call an all clear by any stretch ...

I think that most non Q people are not going to post the stories swirling around the media today. It kinda sucks cause they would have to side with MSM against FreeQs. LOL Quite the pickle....

2,218 posted on 08/01/2018 5:57:08 PM PDT by No_Doll_i

Rush is a total Trump supporter and has been all along.

His method of discourse is subtle but highly effective. He is not bombastic in support like Lou Dobbs or Hannity; but, his method not only leads one to a greater appreciation for PDJT but also to a tactical understanding of where the attacks are coming from.

I am certain about this. I listen to Rush almost every day during my lunch hour. Rush saw Donald Trump from the very beginning as a genius, a communicator with whom Rush identified. This gave him confidence Trump would get the nomination and quite possibly win.

Whenever Trump hits an apparent pothole, like the Access Hollywood tapes ... Rush will be his BEST DEFENDER. I have heard this over and over.

2,219 posted on 08/01/2018 5:58:30 PM PDT by Disestablishmentarian (Read "American Betrayal" by Diana West)

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Still, kudos for all that grammatical heavy lifting.

De nada.

2,220 posted on 08/01/2018 6:14:34 PM PDT by pa_dweller (They never thought she would lose. BWAAAAHAAAHAAHAAaa!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794