Q Anon: (4/12/18) FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

qntmpkts.keybase.pub ^ | 4/12/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is absolutely the best place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. Today, only Qanonposts.com is working for me but weeks ago I was advised that it was hacked:

https://qanonposts.com

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link: Email support for President Trump

[No_Doll_i]

I tried in post 171, was ignored.

[Enchante]

rofl, decency???? Every time I “leave” some twit issues another vile insult. This exchange has been most indecent, but not because of me.

[saywhatagain]

Out surfing, this tweet was to illustrate the relationship of Zuckerberg, Obama and Xi. But as I read the Strzok Page message, am struck by the comment.

"No wonder we lost"

The date is September 25, 2015

Lost what? Any ideas what may have occured around that time. Did we give up something to China through the tech kids?

The article referred to the message is here

State Dinner for Xi Jinping Has High-Tech Flavor

[No_Doll_i]

I will have no further, communication with you. Do not post to me, email me or even mention my name in a post.

I am done. I urge the other people on the thread to take the same stance.

I would say thanks for playing but as troll you were not the least bit amusing...

[No_Doll_i]

It may have been around the time MZ was trying to set up a facility in China and was turned down initially.

[KitJ]

“Good to have an adult in the room.”

---

I’m only pretending.

---

As for the Fusion GPS document, Rep Nunes (and Gowdy) got to view the unredacted document that the FBI owns after giving a 24-hour ultimatum to DOJ/DAG Rosenstein.

From open source reports, the only items redacted that the Committee wasn’t privy to were the name and nationality of the reporting person.

The portions were redacted under the rule of ‘not offending an ally or partner’ or something like that.

The initial take was the obvious person, Steele, and the UK.

On reflection and research, the QAnons think it was the Australian fellow, in England. I can’t recall the Australian’s name at the moment, but others will.

He was totally tied in with the Clintons and their foundation. The current theory is that the Clinton-associated Australian, in England, made stuff up to Steele, who passed it to Fusion, and so on.

The FISC that authorized tapping Trump was presented with fourth-hand hearsay rumors. Viola.

Lots of other ties between the liberal Aussies and the Clinton Foundation have been uncovered by the Qanons.

Lots to look into. Very educational.

FReegards,
K

[saywhatagain]

Am thinking its connected as you re facility, but analyize an FBI reaction.

As you say lost the attempt to set up facility would mean that we have agents who support the expansion of this technology or

Or the opposite, they did agree, FBI knew what was going on and he is lamenting that point???

Am sure its not much . . . but it struck me as being out of place.

[No_Doll_i]

re #1131
“Drop after testimony.”
R U learning yet?
Q

Who’s testimony, there have been so many people that have been sitting in the hot seat, I don’t know who he is referring to.

Any thoughts?

[Keyhopper]

OK, tonight I brewed up some home made mead.
Used mount milick light and a quart of honey
A bottom fermented later yeast
Kinda sweet and has a nice kick
Tally Ho!

[No_Doll_i]

Oh man, it’s a NYT site, I cannot go there, I mean my browser goes nuts and blocks all the content. I’m serious, I can’t read the article.

[No_Doll_i]

Would you mind Freepmailing your responses to the intended person when you are responding to things so far back in time?

Thank Q!

[Keyhopper]

Flee foul creature.👹

[saywhatagain]

Ok folks . . . blue pill / red pill time

For those who choose the red pill, here we go.

Spread of Wahhabism was done at request of West

The Saudi-funded spread of Wahhabism began as a result of Western countries asking Riyadh to help counter the Soviet Union during the Cold War, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman told the Washington Post.

Speaking to the paper, bin Salman said that Saudi Arabia's Western allies urged the country to invest in mosques and madrassas overseas during the Cold War, in an effort to prevent encroachment in Muslim countries by the Soviet Union.

He added that successive Saudi governments had lost track of that effort, saying "we have to get it all back." Bin Salman also said that funding now comes mostly from Saudi-based "foundations," rather than from the government.

Spread of Wahhabism was done at request of West during Cold War – Saudi crown prince

[No_Doll_i]

Well, I will admit I am not the most knowledgable about Saudi’s as others here may be.

Considering the sources cited and reading between the lines, I’d say I would not trust a word of it.

I’m still trying to figure out why we are pals with the Saudi’s considering they fund terrorists as much or more than anyone. They just happen to smile and make nice with us while they are doing it because the want to make deals for weapons with our government.

I mean in theory we don’t need their oil at this point, right?

Feel free to try to change my mind.

[Keyhopper]

195

[No_Doll_i]

Great, just great, we have killed the thread.

[KitJ]

We’ll go through time backwards:

1131 ties to 1130, where Q says, “Finder of this should apply to NSA.”

Referring to an 8Chan post 1003261, which is the post that links the Pentagon/DARPA program called “LifeLog” to Facebook.

The linked articles indicate that the Pentagon (not the CIA) ended a program called “LifeLog” which was undertaken by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), on the same day that Facebook became a reality.

This heavily implies that the government moved an experimental program from DARPA into ‘the wild’ of the Internet. And called it Facebook.

The news of this link, was dropped following the testimony of Mark Zuckerberg on the Hill. Q signaled someone to drop this link once the testimony was done.

Then Q said, they oughtta apply at NSA. That’s a wink to Snowden who originally worked at CIA, then went to NSA (as a CIA plant?). Then went on to infamy.

Consensus says that Snowden may not be a traitor, rather a white-hat that was hounded, leaked, escaped, and came home to help the Q team with busting the deep state.

Which leads to Q post #1144. Big circle here.

And 1131 really links back to #1124 on April 10:

@Snowden
Yes.
Testify then drop.
We have it all.
These people are stupid.
Fireworks.
POTUS’ weekly address.
END.
Q

[Conservative Gato]

Absolutely, most of us on FR wish the “Q cult” could be permanently ignored.

So you speak for "most" of FR???

That's too funny. BTW, the last count we were given, and that was some time ago, 22 million folks were tuned in to Q and his messages. By now, I'm sure it's much more. Just an FYI for your "most" comment, LOL.

CGato

[saywhatagain]

No attempt to change mind. For talking points, these are my thoughts.

It starts with Trump foreign policy strategy / policy. Much more expansive than I will express here. In simple terms, he goes to an adversary, China, Russia, and in this case Saudi Arabia. He finds a common ground. In this case the common ground is an enemy . . . Iran.

Saudis as you know hate Iran much much more than they hate Israel and and the feeling is mutua Iran towards Saudi. So Trump has figured out Iran is the greater threat. It has long been believed, Iran was the key to peace in the middle east. Take care of them first, the rest will fall in place.

So lets start there and he goes to Saudi first and builds a bridge.

Interestingly, due to my work, I happened to know that Saudi and Israel were starting to work together before Trump. They all have a common enemy or greater threat. and that is Iran

Also, I believe, that the new leader of Saudi is a man of his word and he truly wants change for his country.

[Conservative Gato]

Well I have no use for pompous jackals like “bagster” who don’t know anything but think they do. And no, I’m not at all pissed off, you are too ridiculous to arouse any anger here.

You got it all wrong or you are PROJECTING,LOL, since you insist on trolling.

The Bagster is fine comic relief on these threads and also brings some good thoughts to the Q drops.

You on the other hand, well, bring nothing to this thread other than trolling. You seem to over-value your importance here, especially since you'd rather troll than participate civilly in the discussions.

CGato