Posted on 09/12/2016 7:45:27 PM PDT by sparklite2
It is often said that, given an infinite amount of time, monkeys hitting random keys on a typewriter will eventually type the works of Shakespeare.
While it may seem far fetched, an unusual experiment has achieved the fabled task.
To illustrate how paralysed people can type using a device called a brain-computer interface, scientists used monkeys to show how it can be done. Two rhesus macaque monkeys (stock picture) typed a passage from William Shakespeares Hamlet, as well as portions of the New York Times, at 12 words per minute.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
There is a joke in here somewhere but I am not cleaver enough.
Nonsense.
makes sense. Shakespeare mind-reading monkeys
Well we now know where NYT EDITORS COME FROM!........
Uh, no. And only an unadulterated idiot would believe this.
Or a journalist...
― The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
Close relatives to Slow Joe!
I believe the part about the NYT!.........
Only one came close => ‘To be or not to be, that is the #!@&*&^!’
I walked through the San Diego monkey house decades ago, and I can still remember that rich, nostril-singeing stank.
You could almost see it.
George Will and Bill Kristol, finding that nevertrump is a no win position have decided to form an anthropoid writing team under the pen names, “Cheetah & Bonzo”
The premise of this assertion has always been totally ridiculous to me. If monkeys were typing randomly, no amount of time would ever produce the works of Shakespeare.
Before any work of Shakespeare was complete, there would be several copies of Animal Farm, because it is much shorter. But that wouldn’t happen either because the world would run out of paper and ink long before any intelligible books were written.
And if you added infinite paper, ink, monkeys, food, typewriters, and the space needed to generate Shakespeare randomly, the errant texts would fill our galaxy. The monkeys would be drowning in them.
And, even though, an infinite amount of time would never produce Shakespeare because of factors like those above, if it were to happen, it would take a sentient being an exponentially longer time to sort through the volumes to find that one that was complete and correct. (Reading with comprehension takes significantly more time than random typing.)
The sentient beings would also need to coincidentally speak Early Modern English. And they would need to continue to understand it during the entirety of the billions of years quest needed to locate the works of Shakespeare. In fact, they would need an original of the works of Shakespeare because, otherwise, they would be unable to distinguish between a version of Romeo and Juliette where they take poison and die, as opposed to another version where they fly off in the sunset in a space ship.
And even then, Shakespeare would not tell the sentient beings how the monkeys, typewriters, paper, and ink came to exist in the first place.
Those who assert this monkey business simply prefer an unimposing deity of Infinite Time, rather than a living deity who makes demands of created beings. But nothing about infinite time insures any kind of life or progress. The more time goes by, the more likelihood there is of an extinction level event. Even on a rare planet that can support life, the extreme likelihood exists of such events happening more frequently than any supposed evolutionary process that could foster complex life. And that is one of many reasons, billions of years is not a satisfactory answer to the origin of life.
This topic was posted , thanks sparklite2.
Bob Newhart An Infinite Number Of Monkeys
Roger Epps | 92 views | June 10, 2019
I have spent an inordinate amount of time over the decades trying to find out just what the “Gazhornin(sp) Plan” was.
But….Shakespeare didn’t write Shakespeare.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.