Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/12/2016 7:45:27 PM PDT by sparklite2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sparklite2

There is a joke in here somewhere but I am not cleaver enough.


2 posted on 09/12/2016 7:48:46 PM PDT by KC_Lion (Never Killary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

Nonsense.


3 posted on 09/12/2016 7:49:51 PM PDT by Fungi (Cheese, you want cheese? Have your Gorgonzola and all the fungi that come with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

makes sense. Shakespeare mind-reading monkeys


4 posted on 09/12/2016 7:49:55 PM PDT by brucedickinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

Well we now know where NYT EDITORS COME FROM!........


5 posted on 09/12/2016 7:51:27 PM PDT by Red Badger (Make America AMERICA again!.........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2
It is often said that, given an infinite amount of time, monkeys hitting random keys on a typewriter will eventually type the works of Shakespeare. While it may seem far fetched, an unusual experiment has achieved the fabled task.

Uh, no. And only an unadulterated idiot would believe this.

Or a journalist...

6 posted on 09/12/2016 7:54:09 PM PDT by Flycatcher (God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2
“Ford!" he said, "there's an infinite number of monkeys outside who want to talk to us about this script for Hamlet they've worked out.”

― The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

7 posted on 09/12/2016 7:57:17 PM PDT by Redcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2
It was the best of times, it was the blurst of times.

Simpsons.

9 posted on 09/12/2016 7:58:06 PM PDT by Lx (Do you like it? Do you like it, Scott? I call it, "Mr. & Mrs. Tenorman Chili.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

Only one came close => ‘To be or not to be, that is the #!@&*&^!’


11 posted on 09/12/2016 8:06:48 PM PDT by Ken H (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

I walked through the San Diego monkey house decades ago, and I can still remember that rich, nostril-singeing stank.
You could almost see it.


12 posted on 09/12/2016 8:20:45 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnVf1ZoCJSo


13 posted on 09/12/2016 8:22:18 PM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

The premise of this assertion has always been totally ridiculous to me. If monkeys were typing randomly, no amount of time would ever produce the works of Shakespeare.

Before any work of Shakespeare was complete, there would be several copies of Animal Farm, because it is much shorter. But that wouldn’t happen either because the world would run out of paper and ink long before any intelligible books were written.

And if you added infinite paper, ink, monkeys, food, typewriters, and the space needed to generate Shakespeare randomly, the errant texts would fill our galaxy. The monkeys would be drowning in them.

And, even though, an infinite amount of time would never produce Shakespeare because of factors like those above, if it were to happen, it would take a sentient being an exponentially longer time to sort through the volumes to find that one that was complete and correct. (Reading with comprehension takes significantly more time than random typing.)

The sentient beings would also need to coincidentally speak Early Modern English. And they would need to continue to understand it during the entirety of the billions of years quest needed to locate the works of Shakespeare. In fact, they would need an original of the works of Shakespeare because, otherwise, they would be unable to distinguish between a version of Romeo and Juliette where they take poison and die, as opposed to another version where they fly off in the sunset in a space ship.

And even then, Shakespeare would not tell the sentient beings how the monkeys, typewriters, paper, and ink came to exist in the first place.

Those who assert this monkey business simply prefer an unimposing deity of Infinite Time, rather than a living deity who makes demands of created beings. But nothing about infinite time insures any kind of life or progress. The more time goes by, the more likelihood there is of an extinction level event. Even on a rare planet that can support life, the extreme likelihood exists of such events happening more frequently than any supposed evolutionary process that could foster complex life. And that is one of many reasons, billions of years is not a satisfactory answer to the origin of life.


15 posted on 09/12/2016 10:02:21 PM PDT by unlearner (RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sparklite2

But….Shakespeare didn’t write Shakespeare.


20 posted on 11/27/2022 5:00:06 PM PST by Flag_This
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson