Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What kind of cancer did Stuart Scott (ESPN anchor) die from?

Posted on 01/04/2015 11:45:48 AM PST by con-surf-ative

The news reports just say cancer, but not what type. Just curious.


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Sports
KEYWORDS: appendicealcancer; appendix; cancer; espnanchor; stuartscott
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 01/04/2015 11:45:48 AM PST by con-surf-ative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: con-surf-ative

I have found the term “rare” used to describe it. I have seen things about his liver and kidneys. But I haven’t found specifics on the type of his original cancer.


2 posted on 01/04/2015 11:49:04 AM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: con-surf-ative

49 is too young.


3 posted on 01/04/2015 11:50:43 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: con-surf-ative

Appendiceal Cancer, from what I’m seeing. He had endured 58 chemotherapy treatments and three abdomen surgeries. Stuart chose not to be told of his prognosis. I’ve always heard the Chemo, was a horrible treatment for many, though not all cancer patients.


4 posted on 01/04/2015 11:52:31 AM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Agreed. I always thought he was very smooth and entertaining.


5 posted on 01/04/2015 11:55:23 AM PST by con-surf-ative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: con-surf-ative
Cool like the other side of the pillow.

RIP

6 posted on 01/04/2015 12:07:18 PM PST by Doomonyou (Let them eat Lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

A loved one went through chemotherapy and the cancer specialist said it is almost as bad as the disease. It was.


7 posted on 01/04/2015 12:19:29 PM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: con-surf-ative

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/feature/index?page=stuart-scott-index<{>

Good stuff.


8 posted on 01/04/2015 12:39:46 PM PST by Doomonyou (Let them eat Lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

Chemo tries to kill you but just to the edge almost to kill the cancer cells I have seen a few family and friends go though it they all had no pain or much discomfort with the cancer but hen chemo started holy cow RIP to Mr. Scott


9 posted on 01/04/2015 12:40:03 PM PST by al baby (Hi MomÂ…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: con-surf-ative

Multiple. This was his 3 bought.


10 posted on 01/04/2015 12:42:30 PM PST by discostu (The albatross begins with its vengeance A terrible curse a thirst has begun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: con-surf-ative

http://www.sportsgrid.com/media/stuart-scotts-death-highlights-a-rare-and-tragic-form-of-cancer/


11 posted on 01/04/2015 12:45:53 PM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

I think if it was of the Liver, he wouldn’t have lived that long with it. Cancer of the Liver usually kills you within a few weeks, and donors are scarce. With Kidney’s, at least you have two of them.

Chances are, it spread to the Liver and or Kidney’s, and that’s what finally killed him. I have a relative that had Breast Cancer, which was surgically removed, but it showed up in some of her bones a few years later. They treat it, get rid of it, and it shows up somewhere else later. The doctor told her that she’s on borrowed time. Eventually it will show up in a vital Organ(aren’t they all? lol), and that will be the end. She’s been going on like that for about 15 years now.

Such a horrible disease.


12 posted on 01/04/2015 2:28:23 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

I recall reading that most M.D.s who are given a cancer diagnosis will forego chemo, just get their affairs in order and spend time with family/friends.


13 posted on 01/04/2015 2:31:34 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA; AEMILIUS PAULUS

>> “I recall reading that most M.D.s who are given a cancer diagnosis will forego chemo...” <<

.
Of course! Normal chemo is worse than useless, it destroys the immune system completely, removing any hope of long term survival.

A form of chemo called Insulin Potentiation Therapy (IPT), that uses less than 1/20th of the normal dose, often does help, but not in conjunction with radiation.

.


14 posted on 01/04/2015 2:38:53 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: con-surf-ative

Yes, chemo is rough, sometimes very much so.

But radiation can be rough, also. Very painful to mucosal tissues and an energy sapper.

My hat goes off for Mr. Stuart for his courage and determination, and my heart goes out to his memory. What a fighter and a role model for the rest of us.


15 posted on 01/04/2015 2:40:44 PM PST by ForMyChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

I had chemo seen years ago. No side effects to speak of, worked every day. Still ok. Stage 3c colon cancer


16 posted on 01/04/2015 3:21:22 PM PST by TLEIBY308 (Keep yer powder dry and watch yer top Knot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS

One of my best friends has endured multiple rounds of chemo and radiation (plus surgery) for GBM, the most common and aggressive form of brain cancer. Median survival for individuals with that disease (who undergo treatment) is 15 months; my friend has lived for more than three years, and he gives all the credit to God. I can’t disagree.


17 posted on 01/04/2015 3:34:45 PM PST by ExNewsExSpook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

I know 2 people who had that one died the other had an operation in Maryland where they cooled her body so the cancer cells would gel and they could get them and then raised her temperature to like 104, It’s been 4 years. So far, so good.


18 posted on 01/04/2015 4:05:50 PM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tiki

I never heard of that technique. I hope it works for her. That method seems a lot easier to live through than chemo.
Time will tell if insurance will cover that technique.
Remember the Laetrile craze of the 1980’s? People had to travel to Mexico and beyond to obtain this therepeutic version of Vitamin B17 as a treatment for cancer.


19 posted on 01/04/2015 4:11:01 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TLEIBY308
Good for you.

Some have worse effects from chemo than others.

Sounds like your body has been healed.

20 posted on 01/04/2015 4:27:29 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson